0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I am more than aware I am not good enough to be a naked scientist.
a good man always knows his limitations.
Still, about me being overly emotional, allow me to remind you that human heart is 60% brain cells and 40% muscle cells. Heart gives us universal consciousness and brain gives us individual consciousness
We needn't be cloned like sheep Dolly, and there is nothing wrong with being an individual, but without heart which literally thinks and sends electromagnetic waves so that our brain and all other organs form correctly, I wonder if one can solve some of the great mysteries of the universe.
Emotions can get in the way of science, logic and pure Zen, but without emotions, with desire being one of them, who says that without desire we would still want to improve ourselves and explore the universe?
You misunderstand my points.
Creationism and the anthropic principle may suit one well. Yet it occurs to me, one cannot build a house on Alpha Centauri Bb from Earth. You first must land on a distant class M planet to build a house there. So if God is the creator of the entire expanding universe, His presence should be required. If God truly is in everything, then one should assume that His phantom DNA spreads throughout the entire universe. Though we cannot detect Godís DNA because it is e.g. cloaked or we are not technologically advanced enough. It appears, God uses his phantom DNA to create everything, to be everywhere in the universe, with His DNA being superior as it spreads at infinite speed and distances. Since God is the most advanced and most powerful entity, all He can create is less advanced entities and primitive creatures, otherwise He Himself would be a blasphemer, because there is one God only. To recapitulate, to create the entire universe, you usually have to be physically everywhere, because I never heard of a man who built himself a house in Argentina from Pakistan. So, when you have the most advanced DNA, and you donít want to share power otherwise it is blasphemy, all you can create is Oprah. Though Oprah is very nice, she does not appear to be a goddess to me even though tastes differ.
Science can understand religion as is.Religion doesn't understand science.
QuoteScience can understand religion as is.Religion doesn't understand science.Science should not follow faith.Faith should not follow Science. The value of one restricts the other but a moral code needs to be followed by all.
Creationism can be discussed by scientists but if it includes religious people, the discussions will generate contradictory opinions and will not go anywhere because of faith.
So what you're trying to say? That you don't want pope to join the discussion about God?
And who died on the cross for us? Jerry Lewis? Jesus, save us from our sins, or you've done that already?
So stop acting like nerds with glasses and scientist, rather repent, and thou shalt be saved.
Should you make the faithful suffer the facts of science?