T-Cell booster ... CBDWe have seen the months that it takes to run a proper double-blind study - and the large number of participants required to show an effect.
why CBD is not free distributed mids pandemics?Because there seems to be no peer-reviewed evidence that it would do any good
tho there is lack of control group, fSo, there's no actual scientific evidence.
The link you provided is not a peer-reviewed paper, it is a discussion board.
- The people on scienceforums asked for a peer-reviewed paper, and I didn't see a link to one
tho there is lack of control group, fSo, there's no actual scientific evidence.
I think you just answered your question.
the problem here rises whether synthetic CBD is health riskDo you understand that synthetic CBD is the same as natural CBD?
Again, not completely shooting you down, medicine is slowly adopting compounds from cannabis for medical treatment. The effects of non clinical marijuana have been noted in some anecdotal cases as helping fire the immune system against cancer. But unfortunately of all of the cancer patients who have tried cannabis the uncured people are in the majority by quite along way. A study is needed to find what is going on, whether it's a combination of drugs or some people's genes, but it is not the universal cure all for cancer that some tout it as unfortunately.tho there is lack of control group, fSo, there's no actual scientific evidence.
I think you just answered your question.
for T-Cell boosting thre are many studies with control groups, but for sars-cov-2 still think none, altho defacto there are many regular marijuana users that can be evaluated in this case too ...
the problem here rises whether synthetic CBD is health risk! also about bhang beverage mentioned it the 3rd post, think that as indica strain from India as such is extra stuffed with THC thus in long run with large amount of thc provoke contra immune effect, tho this is just my guessing eg. superstitiously drawn from this next clip :D
Do you understand that synthetic CBD is the same as natural CBD?
Again, not completely shooting you down, medicine is slowly adopting compounds from cannabis for medical treatment.
Nope, they make a profit from epilepsy cannabis medicine I should think. That is not a cure either, but a treatment without end unlike a T cell booster for a corona infection. Also doctors are not about to boil down some cannabis in butane liquid in their freezer and give you a quick shot of the residue. That is not clinical medicine.Again, not completely shooting you down, medicine is slowly adopting compounds from cannabis for medical treatment.
here we speek not for cure but T-Cell booster, thus natural phytotherapy immunization, and why still the same its not norm, hm You have in the proposed first link explanation, its damoclean sword for the western capitalistic economies because now through medicine and pharmacology there is big macroeconomic variable for the system, so disbalancing that is not so simple, on top to be free homemade remedy, cmon probably You know this, but let explained to the rest, simply its too big momentum to be loosen to bloom freely, tho I think mids pandemics like this if not delivered as free remedy by the states, at lest can lift the ban for personal growth at least for few plants per person ...
Nope, they make a profit from epilepsy cannabis medicine I should think. That is not a cure either, but a treatment without end unlike a T cell booster for a corona infection. Also doctors are not about to boil down some cannabis in butane liquid in their freezer and give you a quick shot of the residue. That is not clinical medicine.
maybe in natural CBD there is some extra spin of electronsBollocks.
yes I am against concentratesWhy?
maybe in natural CBD there is some extra spin of electronsStill bollocks.
@Bored chemist , hm I provided info in the footnotes of the 8th post i.e. how chemistry pharmacology and medicine are not aware for bioresonance, and till that scientific field is not considered also in pharmacology we will have such paradoxes as the proposed discrepancies in the 3rd post between natural and artificial CBD ...The reason it is bollocks is that we can measure electron spin.
hm your ignorance sounds familiar [1] butYou seem to have been unable to answer the question you cited.
maybe in natural CBD there is some extra spin of electrons
t if experimental vaccine technology can be acceptedIt wasn't.
You are obviously willing to derail this discussion in petty excuses why CBD not need to be freeThis is not a "petty excuse".
You are proposing that the government spends a lot of money- on the basis of no actual evidence.
my opinion tho about the natural CBD could lift the ban on Marijuana Legalization but for that I acknowledge there is need of comparative studiesJust to make it clear how unrelated those are.
Why are you mixing up two different things?
CBD is not THC.
the side effects of any misuse while driving or working should be treated as alcohol intoxication nowadaysYes; that means banning driving while intoxicated.
You'll know I am for (marijuana) leaf smoothyThere were a couple in Australia who operated a franchise selling cheesecakes.
Please compare any other T-Cell boosterThe approved COVID-19 vaccines have been now rolled out to millions of people world-wide.
You keep failing to answer the obvious question.
Why should the government spend taxpayers' money on something which probably will not work
guessing is wrongSince neither of us has data from a proper trial, both of us are "guessing", aren't we?
Legalization would mean freedom for selftherapyNot really, because not many people can actually live their lives stoned.
You didn't come here to listen to reason did you?
"why CBD is not free distributed mids pandemics?"
Because there is no reason to think it would help.
Your opinion is professionally biasedGrown ups call this sort of bias "competence".
"why CBD is not free distributed mids pandemics?"
Because there is no reason to think it would help.
Your opinion is professionally biasedGrown ups call this sort of bias "competence".
Are you suggesting that my view is influenced by my job in the pharma industry?
indeed is conflict of interest,No it isn't.
this is subjective who is the voice of reason
No, it isn't. Truth isn't subjective.
Can you explain why there's a conflict of interest rather than just bias on your part?indeed is conflict of interest,No it isn't.
It's just prejudice on your part.
proposed real studies that show T-Cell boosting by CBD ...Ok, so now you would like to propose a study, to see if CBD boosts T-Cell activity.
I don't mind, in the circumstances, burning £10^7 to find out if the idea works. It's a reasonable investment (or "punt" if you prefer). If you like, I will send you the ten pence that is my share.Quote from: Osogovoproposed real studies that show T-Cell boosting by CBD ...Ok, so now you would like to propose a study, to see if CBD boosts T-Cell activity.
- Phase 3 Clinical Studies cost $10 million++
- What laboratory evidence do you have that would justify investing this sort of money into a Clinical Study?
Can you explain why there's a conflict of interest rather than just bias on your part?indeed is conflict of interest,No it isn't.
It's just prejudice on your part.
on paper as formula, in reality studies show that there is glitch, why this is the result suppose bioresonance could be case, yet this is for now still fringe field, maybe in natural CBD there is some extra spin of electrons
T-Cell boosting by CBD .This news story (with a link to the peer-reviewed paper in Nature) suggests that exercise improves your immune system health.
the body is recognizing the natural vs synthetic cbd
the electron fingerprints are leaved from everything on everything
I am aware from the experiments of the biologist Petr Garyaev
when I say bioresonance here I mean how the body is recognizing the natural vs synthetic cbd,But that simply does not happen.
And I'm also intrigued to hear the OP's response to this.
Quote from: Bored chemist on Yesterday at 23:48:44
Quote from: Bored chemist on Yesterday at 19:37:37
Quote from: Osogovo on Yesterday at 19:30:52
indeed is conflict of interest,
No it isn't.
It's just prejudice on your part.
Can you explain why there's a conflict of interest rather than just bias on your part?
@Bored chemist I know is more than unpolite to from me to state that You are biased, but believe me I've seen even fake bipartisan idolatry where people bow in from some political entity just because local belongingness, what about here where You are part of the system, altho this dont means You are per'se biased but lets say more than skeptical, what in the end could only demotivate people to go after broad debate, eg. Bio_Man from BiFo is way too openminded [1] and You should be too ...It's not that you are being "impolite".
You should be aware that particle physics is in big vacuum thus bioresonance dont needs to work as You expectNonsense
they are due to synthetic cbdYou still seem not to understand that synthetic and natural CBD are the same thing.
stupidity comes form ignoranceAnd you stupidly mistook my qualifications for my job.
You miss the vacuum pointYou didn't seem to have a point to make.
disrespectfulThat's a big word from the man who said
yes career man have nothing to loose a what to say careerism usually is conformistic and swap normal reason with corporative or institutional even both as plutocratic hug nowadays so I can understand why by Your measure CBD should not be free prescribed, but think most of the People would reasoning otherwise ...
You know recently through research in desert conditions it is found that plant intake of water is 80% (otherwise 20% as I remember) if the water is magnetizedThat isn't research, it is pseudoscience (at best).
altho I assume also that there are other factors that we are missing around the natural substances that still the science are not taking them in accountIt's not that "still the science are not taking them in account", science looked very carefully at the idea that natural and man-made things were different.
hm if the "prime" dynamo of some theory dont works...
if the water is magnetized
most probably already the bioresonance effect
for what we need different theories
still knowing how even small changes in the electron position change the behavior of elements we shouldnt dismiss that in synthetic production of CBD there is potential negative glitch in this respect,
You will not be able to grasp Masaru Emoto bioresonance approach
the socalled aether theory ..Why are you so keen on old ideas that have been shown not to work?
if SM is deadIt isn't dead. It's just that you haven't understood it.
I said to BC I will not respondIf you do not respond to the problems I raise withy your ideas then it will look as if you do not know the answers.
if the water is magnetized i.e. the rearangement of the moleculs as crystal latice was more symmetric thus the plants were recognizing it as usefulPlants take up liquid water from the soil.
@Kryptid probably You didnt check the links in the footnotes
You have nice debate in the researchgate link
so magnetized water works as expected
I'll accept that You will not be able to grasp Masaru Emoto bioresonance approach [1]
but trying to "debunk" magnetic water because there are not enough studies is the same prejudice that rolled on with CBD earlier two decades ago, tho as we can see someone is still blocking or postponing its public pedestal ...
for SM what to say, saying You are driving car like that is pointing that only effect from that is the license in your pocket, but Please open new thread and we will examine how long such license will stay in your pocket, sometimes its really pointless to argue about implanted scientific trends which time long ago expired but because scientific elitism or funding purposes are still kept in artificially induced coma ...
if SM is dead
the current quantum mechanical model which postulates "flows of electrons" should be reexamined
in my view through radiant energy the socalled aether theory
will open huge room for new at least calibration of the spectrometers
still I think the particle physics is fundamentally wrong if there is no super symmetry
like that seeing the difference between artificial and natural CBD
but as I said we are light years from such even theoretical reasoning what about measuring instruments that will grasp bioresonce
SM pseudoscience
I know just that the photonicsspectra article points that the current physics understanding is not explaining eg. how the vibration of light i.e. particular frequency can activate proteins
but also cant explain many other things eg.Blackbody Radiation
also the Photoelectric Effect (Emission of electrons from metal surfaces when light shines) and Emission Spectra too (Emission of light from electronically excited gas atoms)
for once think out of the box ...
cant explain many other things eg.Blackbody Radiation (Energy objects emit when they are heated) also the Photoelectric Effect (Emission of electrons from metal surfaces when light shines) and Emission Spectra too (Emission of light from electronically excited gas atoms) also there is the wave-particle paradox etc. etc.The current models in physics, particularly QM, are based on an understanding of BBR, the photoelectric effect etc.