0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Does the gravity of galaxies block the in-between-galaxy BBT spatial expansion?
If so, is there Q-E between galaxies?
Why not say that gravity localised in a way that anything that reduces to 0-gravity, like in between galaxies, is expanded owing to the BBT spatial expansion?
If Q-E surpasses gravity, can you explain the shape of the universe that way?
Newton would still be upset.
Quote from: opportunity on 28/12/2018 06:38:06Does the gravity of galaxies block the in-between-galaxy BBT spatial expansion?No and there's no reason that it should.Quote If so, is there Q-E between galaxies?Almost certainly not, given that those galaxies are billions of years old and therefore billions of years of events have occurred which could easily break any such entanglement.Quote from: opportunity on 28/12/2018 06:38:06Why not say that gravity localised in a way that anything that reduces to 0-gravity, like in between galaxies, is expanded owing to the BBT spatial expansion?Because it technically isn't true. Gravity's strength never falls all the way to zero.Quote from: opportunity on 28/12/2018 06:38:06If Q-E surpasses gravity, can you explain the shape of the universe that way?What does it mean to say that quantum entanglement "surpasses" gravity?
Hang on, Q-E is beyond light speed, its immediate. Correct me if I am wrong.....and it doesn't depend on the expansion of space, as you say.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/10/danish-physicists-claim-to-cast-doubt-on-detection-of-gravitational-waves/What does that add to the conversation?
Maybe also I'm thinking what Newton was wrong about depends on the BBT?
I've read a number of descriptions re. Q-E. I'm unsure as to why Q-E in certain contexts can't represent a mechanism of "either - or", like in computer syntax, and thus a transfer of information. Broadly, in a cluster of particles that are in Q-E with another cluster of particles elsewhere, is there a chance they can be the mirror image of each other, not the same, of course, yet asymmetrically linked re. spin (and the like)?