The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Rincewind
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Rincewind

Pages: 1 2 [3]
41
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Light's interaction with matter
« on: 01/10/2005 17:49:11 »
Is it important to remember that a photon doesn't experience time according to relativity, or does one dismiss relativity whilst thinking in QM terms?  

A photon does have mass, just no rest mass.

For any other object, its kinetic energy is a function of its rest mass, yet a photon has no rest mass.  It is precisely for this reason that nothing other than a photon can reach light speed.

As a massive body approaches light speed, more and more of its net mass is made of Kinetic Energy, analogous to photonic mass.

Sorry, just thinking aloud:)

42
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Is Relativity Wrong?
« on: 01/10/2005 15:23:15 »
I think the generally accepted interpretation of relativity says that when you go faster your time slows down.  So, for example, the astronauts who went to the moon and back are slightly younger than other peeps who were born at the same time but stayed on Earth.

I was thinking, if a ship and some light left a planet then the ship came back, having aged less than the people on the planet, wouldn't the distance the light had travelled have to be different as well?  Either that or it would have to have travelled at a different velocity for those on the planet and those on the ship, right?

Am I making some kind of basic error here?

Pages: 1 2 [3]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 27 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.