1

New Theories / how the solar sestem was formed a slightly difront take on it

« on: 18/06/2016 10:22:12 »

I think as the sun exploded into existences it plasmas were disbursed out from the explosion and accretion took care of the rest . As these plasmas orbit the new sun and pass though the accretion disc they pick matter and mass until they form planets   

2

New Theories / Re: Is dark energy the outflow of energy associated with a Universal black hole?

« on: 17/06/2016 20:41:40 »

Stacyjones  is i think on the track every thing that's been observed has a shape . How would it make sense that the universe would not . Even if that shape is flexible if it has form it has shape . the firmament is a religious term and has little meaning here . look at my post . What is gravitational accumulation it gives mechanism's fore how a multiverse could have expanded from the singularity of a universal black hole although the universe may not be a out flow as described . I describe the outflow as an expansion of the singularity . Its still close       

3

New Theories / Re: what is gravitional accumulation

« on: 17/06/2016 17:49:04 »

I know i use the term warping a lot i like the term more than space-time curvature i understand what curvature is though however i do not completely agree with it . As i think it is more localized and propagated out only as fare as the strength of gravity will allow . It would be contained by the multidirectional movement of space- time . I think space-time is still rotating around the axes of rotation of the singularity that it expanded from as it expands . As gravity reaches out from its mass this multidirectional motion curves space-time around it . curvature has ben described as placing a sphere on a rubber mat and seeing the curvature that it creates . This would be ok if space-time were a fabric . However space-time acts more like a liquid . Gravitational accumulation could be described by taking that sphere and putting it in a tank of water ok nothing is curved the volume of the water surrounds the sphere . Now start the sphere spinning now observe the water curving around the sphere . Ok this is not enough curvature . Now put some pins or rods protruding out from the surface of the sphere . Observe the increase in the curvature the longer the pins or rods the greater the curvature . Also the curvature is limited to a point just beyond the end of the pins or rods . The water is space-time the sphere is mass the spin is the multidirectional motion of space-time the pins or rods represent gravity . i think this more completely explains space-time curvature .  Inestiens gravity fields and  pressure variance's  just don't hold up . If it did you would not have infinity's when trying to combine the forces . And physics would not appear brake down at the event horizon of a black hole . Inestien  is one of my hero's however he was human and capable of making mistakes and he did not have the accumulative knowledge of the past 100 years to work with . I described gravity as being a weaker static charge however it isn't really weaker as most of its charge is extended out from the fiber causing it to appear weaker as it accumulates the fibers and gets stronger it reaches out further as the gravity of a stare reaches out further than that planet . when it accumulates as in stare formation not enough of this charge is dissipated and it begins to show its true strength and overcomes electromagnetism causing a collapse and forming a stare . This would just would need to be ramped up to form a black hole . what's at the  center of a black hole a tiny extremely massive highly compressed little ball of fibers . i only called them fibers because of Inestiens fabric of space-time i thought if was going to challenge his gravity the least i could do is call them fibers and i think they would look sorta like fibers with a lot of threads extending out from them shorter threads fore electromagnetism and much longer ones fore gravity                     

4

New Theories / why is mars red where did the iron oxide come from

« on: 15/06/2016 09:35:04 »

I think that the moon forming impactor may have come close enough to mars to have a strong gradational effect the small planet causing a large bulge to form on one side . As the planets pass this effect would get stronger and form a massive volcano .that would erupt part of its liquid metal core onto its surface and into space . This could explain the iron oxide . also it could explain the iron found on the moon if the impactor were trailed by some of this matter . as the new moon passes through this matter as it orbits the earth . Would also explain why mars has a weak magnetic field . Also where the water went  . Although i think there would be a lot of water under the surface . Also could explain the asteroid belt if there were a small planet and the impactor passed close enough fore its gravity to pull the small planet apart . All this gravitational tugging would explain how the impactor could hit at just the right angle .   

5

New Theories / Re: Theory of everything,what do you guys think?

« on: 14/06/2016 12:09:58 »

you know your not wrong really ? and nothing in science using the scientific method has ever been wrong ? really thought experiments are imagination and they don't count ? wow . I don't think his idea is right but i would not just dismiss it without first thinking about it to se if any part could be and even if i can find no part that makes sense i still would not try to belittle it   

6

New Theories / Re: Could the internet become a conscious being and then delete mankind?

« on: 14/06/2016 11:34:09 »

I have an internal cardiac device that i am dependent on and others have other devices that may not be necessary fore them to live but do restore function we cyborgs are already here in one sense

7

New Theories / Re: what was the moon forming impactor

« on: 14/06/2016 11:12:20 »

It could explain a lot more also

8

New Theories / what was the moon forming impactor

« on: 14/06/2016 11:10:05 »

I think the moon forming impactor was a ice dwarf planet this could explain why there is so much water on earth . Also i don't think that without the ice hitting the partly molten earth that there would be enough force to blast enough matter fare enough out to form a large moon like we have . could also explain how the processes fore life were started if the ice planet had a liquid  ocean under the ice there would be a lot of water flooding out over a lot of magma . could also explain why we have oceans and seas . If you think about how much pressure fore that much mass there would be a lot of heat from that pressure near the core . I think most ice planets should have these oceans .   

9

New Theories / Re: what is gravitional accumulation

« on: 14/06/2016 04:48:28 »

Gravitational accumulation predicts dark matter and dark energy as a product of the fibers . Also it predicts the structures made by the galaxies and there lay lines that i think is slowing the universe from the inside out and makes it appear to be accelerating this apparent acceleration has been observed as well as the structures . It also explains why gravity is so weak at the subatomic level and yet be strong enough to create a singularity at the other end of the scale . Both gravity and electromagnetism are accumulative this is why we see the extreme of both in galaxies and there black holes . Also it could be used to predict nearly all the motion that we have seen so fare . I have had this idea or theory in my mind fore about 14 years now and been working on it in my mind since i was 10 before i started getting it online the only place it existed is in my controlled day dreams . I don't like calling it a theory as it is just a idea until other people look at it and investigate it however if calling it a theory gets it looked at and investigated then so be it       

10

New Theories / Re: what is gravitional accumulation

« on: 13/06/2016 12:12:05 »

also if I'm right and i don't really know if i am or not then mass can have no more gravity than the maximum output of the fibers contained within it . i think this solves unified field electromagnetism produces gravity as a weaker static charge then they combine to form the nuclear forces through the proses of particle and atom formation they are unified through the formation of the first atom . As all 4 forces would be needed to form a hydrogen atom . Also this could account fore and give a mechanism fore the creation of all the hydrogen in the early universe   

11

New Theories / Re: what is gravitional accumulation

« on: 13/06/2016 11:49:47 »

Also i would like feedback on this if anyone has questions i will try to answer them as best i can with my limited ability to type 

12

New Theories / Re: what is gravitional accumulation

« on: 13/06/2016 11:41:30 »

This is only part of this idea or theory and some things are not as clear as i would like them to be as i am disable and have a lot of trouble typing and i am typing this striate out of my mind off the top of my head as it were 

13

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?

« on: 13/06/2016 11:00:07 »

look at my theory of gradational accumulation keep all the above in mind while you read it . It is only some of the first part i have the rest in my mind

14

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Did you know the universe is expanding faster than previously measured?

« on: 13/06/2016 10:40:54 »

yes i have predicted it and the farther out in the expansion you look the faster it should appear to be accelerating and the farther back into the expansion you go the slower the acceleration should appear as my theory of gradational accumulation predicts i think the universe is slowing from the inside out and only appears to be accelerating i have posted some of the first part of this theory on this site the rest is in my mind i would be happy to give science the rest of it if someone would like to here it       

15

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: If I were to witness the Big Bang, what would I be able to see, if anything?

« on: 13/06/2016 10:19:35 »

if you were outside the bubble you wouldn't be able to see anything until after the end of inflation when the first galaxy's started to form structures and slow the expansion from the inside out from ether inside or out of the bubble i don't think you would be able to see past the w-map image or not much past 

16

New Theories / what is gravitional accumulation

« on: 29/05/2016 03:24:03 »

I think that the current model of gravity is wrong .
I think that space-time is made up of energetic fibers i think these fibers could be made if a extremely energetic gamma ray burst were to hit a extremely powerful magnetic field causing the light waves to wrap around the particles of light creating a energetic fiber . This fiber would have a internal magnetic field that would allow the particles to levitate and move freely inside the fibers . This movement would create a electromagnetic charge also a weaker static charge would be created aka gravity . As the fibers get closer the charges act on each other the particles inside fibers become excited and move more rapidly this rapid movement increases the charges and frequency's of the fibers . This causes a rapid collapse of the fibers as the fibers collapse and compress gravity causes a runaway effect on the collapse the rapid build up of gravity further compresses the fibers into a singularity . This compression continues until the pressure is so great that it stops the movement of the particles inside the fibers effectively switching off the gravity This releases compression and the compressed fibers fly away from the axes of rotation at the speed of light squared . And a new multiverse is born with 3 universes a positive or matter universe a neutral universe and a negative or antimatter universe each universe has 4 dimension up down side to side depth and the volume of space-time that surrounds it fore a total of 12 dimensions .  As the compression releases the particles inside the fibers begin there rapid movement and gravity switches back on and starts accumulating fibers . Now that the fibers are in extremely rapid motion they accumulate more locally when 3 fibers cluster a positive a negative and neutrally charged fibers a magnetic field forms around the cluster forming a fundamental particle . These particles then cluster to form other particles . When enough particles cluster they form a stronger field this field interacts with the fields of the particles creating the strong nuclear force . Then the more energetic particles begin to orbit the center mass forming an extended field forming a hydrogen atom . As the expansion continues hydrogen is produced on a massive scale anywhere the fibers are still clustered and accumulates and collapses rapidly creating the first and largest supermassive black holes and galaxies these galaxies produce enormous magnetic charges that extend out and connect and form lay lines that start to form a structure this has a braking effect on the expansion slowing it from the inside out .  As the outside edge pulls away from the center it stretches the fibers against the structures forming near center causing a elastic effect.  this would make the expansion appear to be accelerating when observed from within . The multidirectional motion of the first galaxies would further limit the accumulation of hydrogen causing it to form smaller clusters that accumulate to form supermassive stares that rapidly collapse and form black holes that form galaxies of there own and continue building structures and slowing and stabilizing the expansion . Since the fibers are emitting both gravity and electromagnetic energy in all parts of the multiverse it would explain dark matter and energy also it could explain quantum entanglement . As an electromagnetic wave traveling along the surface of the fibers also agrees with inflationary theory also my model of gravity could help to solve unified field theory . I call it the theory of gravitational accumulation .               

17

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: How can we say a particle is travelling faster than the speed of light if we can't measure it?

« on: 26/05/2016 18:43:03 »

quantum entanglement could be a hint. it could have a
 possible explanation if the information is moving faster than light.