The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?

  • 43 Replies
  • 18578 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stacyjones

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 194
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • View Profile
Re: How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?
« Reply #40 on: 08/05/2016 21:38:02 »
Can you explain to me how, "The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether" is interpreted to mean there is no such thing as an ether? Is the issue with the term?

Let's make up a new term in order to start fresh. I will label the mass which fills 'empty' space which is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it the 'rehtea'.

I think it's safe to say after over 30 years and more than a billion dollars and there being zero evidence of WIMPs we can move beyond that incorrect notion. If you want to continue to believe in something that billions of dollars and decades have been spent looking for with zero evidence of it then that is your choice.

I'm going to take it a step further and say that the whole notion of dark matter as a clump of stuff that travels with the matter is incorrect.

Rehtea has mass, physically occupies three dimensional space and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.

The "missing mass" is the mass of the rehtea which is connected to and neighbors the matter which is displaced by the matter.

The Milky Way's halo is lopsided due to the matter in the Milky Way moving through and displacing the rehtea, analogous to a submarine moving through and displacing the water.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Zer0



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7002
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 191 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?
« Reply #41 on: 08/05/2016 22:31:03 »
It is so hilarious how the mask slips when you come across someone who knows one of your sources personally. You didn't expect that then did you. You just appear foolish now. I did advise you to stop digging.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline stacyjones

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 194
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
    • View Profile
Re: How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?
« Reply #42 on: 08/05/2016 22:52:01 »
How do you interpret, "The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether" to mean there is no such thing as an ether?
Logged
 

Offline LarryLee Booth

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 17
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?
« Reply #43 on: 13/06/2016 11:00:07 »
look at my theory of gradational accumulation keep all the above in mind while you read it . It is only some of the first part i have the rest in my mind
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

The big bang theory says space expanded, what space did it expand into?

Started by Unseen PerspectiveBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 4
Views: 847
Last post 11/08/2022 03:49:45
by Bogie_smiles
What does theory predict for the average velocity of a single atom in a black hole?

Started by John Burnap Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 4210
Last post 06/02/2011 21:30:03
by John Burnap
MOVED: New Theory: Is light an independent entity, or is it an effect of a larger mechanism ?

Started by Colin2BBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 1639
Last post 13/10/2019 08:34:34
by Colin2B
MOVED: Crap New Theory of size and shape of single optical photon?

Started by Colin2BBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 1384
Last post 23/06/2021 12:35:47
by Colin2B
MOVED: How did life begin? Viruses and bacteria. Biological Combination Theory?

Started by Colin2BBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 0
Views: 111
Last post 27/01/2023 22:40:04
by Colin2B
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.19 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.