[alright1234 (OP)]

Does Lenard's particle structure of light negate the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that forms the coherency of Maxwell's EM light wave, and, can an expanding em field represent Lenard's particle structure of light.

[alancalverd]

Why set the clock back 100 years and consider the raving of a dead Nazi to be of any importance in physics? Or did a man from Harvard introduce you to it?

[evan_au]

Lenard made observations on the photoelectric effect in 1902.
Einstein explained it in 1905 - and got a Nobel prize for it.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality#Photoelectric_effect

Wikipedia tries to summarise this photoelectric duality like this:

Electromagnetic radiation propagates following linear wave equations, but can only be emitted or absorbed as discrete elements, thus acting as a wave and a particle simultaneously.

[alright1234 (OP)]

Lenard made observations on the photoelectric effect in 1902.
Einstein explained it in 1905 - and got a Nobel prize for it.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality#Photoelectric_effect

Wikipedia tries to summarise this photoelectric duality like this:

Electromagnetic radiation propagates following linear wave equations, but can only be emitted or absorbed as discrete elements, thus acting as a wave and a particle simultaneously.

Is an electromagnetic field based on Faraday's induction effect expanding?

[Bored chemist]

Does Lenard's particle structure of light negate the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that forms the coherency of Maxwell's EM light wave,

Any form of quantisation will mess up Maxwell's equations.

can an expanding em field represent Lenard's particle structure of light.

Who cares?
We have models for the propagation of EM radiation, and for the interaction with matter.
They work very well.
It's unrealistic to suppose that a long dead theory from a long dead theorist would do better.

[alright1234 (OP)]

Does Lenard's particle structure of light negate the continuity of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that forms the coherency of Maxwell's EM light wave,

Any form of quantisation will mess up Maxwell's equations.

can an expanding em field represent Lenard's particle structure of light.

Who cares?
We have models for the propagation of EM radiation, and for the interaction with matter.
They work very well.
It's unrealistic to suppose that a long dead theory from a long dead theorist would do better.

I did not ask you if anyone cared. I asked you ---can an expanding em field represent Lenard's particle structure of light.

[Bored chemist]

Yes.
But it may not represent it accurately.
So who cares?

[alright1234 (OP)]

Contradiction

[Bored chemist]

Contradiction

Yes; you are good at that.
So what?

[alright1234 (OP)]

Can an expanding em field represent a particle structure? An expanding electromagnetic field in mutually exclusive to a particle structure which negative all of theoretical physics that is based on the gauge.

[Bored chemist]

Can an expanding em field represent a particle structure?

Yes
Here is a bad representation of a hydrogen atom

  O   .

The "O" is the nucleus and the "." is the electron.

That representation is carried to your eyes from the screen by an expanding em field- specifically, light

Did you not realise what question you were asking?

[alright1234 (OP)]

an expanding electromagnetic field cannot maintain a particle structure of Einstein's electromagnetic photon since, as an electromagnetic field propagates, an electromagnetic field expands. The size of an electromagnetic photon would increase (expand), during propagation, which would eliminate the particle structure of Einstein's electromagnetic photon. A particle structure is incompatible with an expanding electromagnetic field yet Einstein is supporting Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is the foundation of the wave-particle duality theory of light.

[Kryptid]

an expanding electromagnetic field cannot maintain a particle structure of Einstein's electromagnetic photon since, as an electromagnetic field propagates, an electromagnetic field expands. The size of an electromagnetic photon would increase (expand), during propagation, which would eliminate the particle structure of Einstein's electromagnetic photon. A particle structure is incompatible with an expanding electromagnetic field yet Einstein is supporting Planck's quantization of Maxwell's electromagnetic field that is the foundation of the wave-particle duality theory of light.

Just because a gas expands in a vacuum doesn't mean that the atoms which make up the gas expand as well. Same thing with photons and electromagnetic radiation.

[alright1234 (OP)]

Maxwell's electromagnetic field expands or radio waves would not dimension in intensity.

[Kryptid]

Maxwell's electromagnetic field expands or radio waves would not dimension in intensity.

What does "would not dimension in intensity" mean?

Nobody said that electromagnetic fields don't expand. But if you assume that photons must expand as well, then that is a non-sequitur. Gas atoms don't expand just because a gas expands. The distance between the atoms just increases. Same thing with photons being emitted from a light bulb or some similar emitter of EM radiation. The photons get further apart from each other, but that's all.

[alright1234 (OP)]

Maxwell's electromagnetic field expands or radio waves would not dimension in intensity.

What does "would not dimension in intensity" mean?

Nobody said that electromagnetic fields don't expand. But if you assume that photons must expand as well, then that is a non-sequitur. Gas atoms don't expand just because a gas expands. The distance between the atoms just increases. Same thing with photons being emitted from a light bulb or some similar emitter of EM radiation. The photons get further apart from each other, but that's all.

Well, if a photon is composed of an em field than it would have to expand to and if you say that a gas molecule is composed of an em field (gauge) then the gas molecule would also expand that would you are dealing with.

[Kryptid]

Well, if a photon is composed of an em field than it would have to expand

No it wouldn't. The expansion of the field is a bulk behavior of all of the photons collectively, not individual photons.

[alright1234 (OP)]

An electromagnetic photon depict a particle structure.

[Kryptid]

An electromagnetic photon depict a particle structure.

Sometimes. Sometimes they act as waves instead.

[alright1234 (OP)]

An electromagnetic photon depict a particle structure.

Sometimes. Sometimes they act as waves instead.

An electromagnetic photon can never depict a particle structure. NEVER.