[jerrygg38 (OP)]

Is this a dual light-speed Universe?
   The universe that we see and measure is a constant light speed Co universe. How did it come to exist? Was it created at some time. Was a magical creator necessary? Why is it disappearing? Will it ever return. My latest book “The Dual Light-Speed Universe and the Dot-Wave Theory with Quantum Entanglement 2020” which will be on line at Amazon in a few more days will answer these and many other questions.
   I have been working on this for almost 40 years now. I thought I could solve the universe when I started in 1981. Now at 81 years I am still working on it. Over the years things change. I rely upon all the scientific information I can get on the internet and the television.
   I have always believed in coexisting universes of higher and higher light speeds. Yet they were independent. Since the latest quantum entanglement experiment experiments have shown interactions at a distance at a speed greater than 10,000C, it became obvious to me that  the underlying operation of our universe is at a speed much greater than our light speed.
   We then live in two dimensions. We see and measure at Co= 2.998E8 meters per second. We came from the light speed Cs dimension where Cs = (Uo/G)Co = 18833Co.
   Prior to the big bang only Cs dot-waves existed. This compressed to a pinpoint and the Co/Cs universe was created. At the big bang the new version of the universe expanded rapidly at the geometric mean of Co and Cs. Cgm= 137.23Co.
   This period of super inflation slowed to a little over Co today. AAs the universe expands the Co/Cs particles radiate Cs photonic dot-waves. Slowly the universe erases and returns to its original state.
  Einstein and Bohr disagreed on the nature of the universe. Thus the two theories of Relativity and Quantum mechanics have a problem. Einstein’s math is excellent. It has proven to be accurate in many cases. Likewise Quantum theory has given us so many answers. The conflict between them will be resolved in the dual light speed theory.

[Bored chemist]

Is this a dual light-speed Universe?

No.

And, unless you have any evidence that says otherwise, you might as well stop now.
As discussed in an earlier thread, you pulled this

We came from the light speed Cs dimension where Cs = (Uo/G)Co = 18833Co.

out from where the sun doesn't shine.
It's just rubbish you made up.
It's not science.
Stop cluttering the place with it

[Kryptid]

It would be nice to see some actual evidence for a change.

[jerrygg38 (OP)]

To Kryptid and Bored Chemist
   Did Einstein have evidence in   1905. It was many years later when others proved what he said was true.
  I have explanations and equations. In the future others will provide the evidence of what I say to be true. I cannot please those who demand proof right away. Yet there are those who will ponder what I say and work on it.

[Kryptid]

Did Einstein have evidence in   1905.

Two things to say about that:

(1) Einstein had evidence (for at least some of his ideas) in the form of thought experiments and equations that followed logically from known physics. You do not. There is no thought experiment based on known physics pointing to the existence of a second light speed. Quantum entanglement does not count because it cannot transmit information (whereas a light beam can).
(2) Relativity was not widely accepted in 1905. It was only after experimental support was acquired that it was.

It was many years later when others proved what he said was true.

Science isn't about proof, it's about evidence. Long-held theories supported by old evidence can still be overturned by the acquisition of new evidence that is incompatible with them.

I have explanations and equations.

That lack support.

In the future others will provide the evidence of what I say to be true.

How do you know that? Is your model even falsifiable? Can you think of a potential experiment that would be able to turn up a negative result if your model is wrong?

I cannot please those who demand proof right away.

I'm not asking for proof. I'm asking for evidence.