0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The likeliest ...
The chief factor that led physics to reject an ether was Michelson and Morley's 1887 experiment, repeated with modifications by others since then, involving measurements of the behavior of light beams, using optical refraction, which involve a key assumption that the light beams would have to be affected by (interact with) any kind of ether.
In my Model
I believe the logic of the model, as described above, is enough to justify some investigative interest.
The claim above, that "the ether has been shown not to exist," is false. The chief reason physics has continued to deny the existence of an ether is the series of experiments called "Michelson-Morley." (MMX). MMX was first performed in 1887 by Michelson and Morley, and has been repeated by others, with various modifications, since then. The MMX sets of experiments have used optical measurements of the refraction of beams of light which have been subjected to different gravity-settings (as in the original MMX) or, since then, to other experimental modifications. MMX experimenters have always assumed that the light beams being measured must necessarily be interacting with any kind of ether. -However, in my model of the ether, a universal ether exists that consists of ether units that are ultimately rarified, and which were formed, universally, when the ether itself originated. Therefore, such ether units would be first-causal, presumptively ultimately-rarified, and thus vanishingly smaller than the photon units which transmit light beams visible to our eyes. So there could be no inertial interface between the ether and the light beams measured in MMX. The basic assumption of MMX being false, physics has been wrong in dismissing the ether.
There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference.
Quote from: Halo_Nova on 23/03/2021 16:11:00There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference.How do you figure?
So why call it ether at all? What experiment could reveal that your ether exists?
My model of ether has yet to get any real recognition in the science establishment, so it would be premature to outline a way it could be tested.
Quote from: Halo_Nova on 23/03/2021 16:11:00There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference. If by "buffer" you mean there has to be an intermediate stage between the ether in my Model and the quantum unhits familiar to physics, the idea would be this. - The ether units are the primary actors in energic processes. The way they transition to larger units (at first "etheroidal," in my model), and to quantum size-scale units is as follows. -The ether units being vibratory, their vibrations might be un-aligned, or random, as in a non-energized region. But if there is an incoming linear energy, such as an electric or light flow, then as the etheric component of the incoming force interacts with the quieter ether units already there, the vibrations of the "resident" ether units become aligned with each other, and after that, the ether units begin to entrain with each other, forming larger and larger units, up to the scale of quantum units. Once a pair of ether units align vibrationally, or "pair up," if they then interact with a matching pair, they merge, and so on, and this process keeps entraining.
Quote from: MichaelMD on 25/03/2021 11:16:06My model of ether has yet to get any real recognition in the science establishment, so it would be premature to outline a way it could be tested.Unless it is testable, it is not science and the scientific community will continue, quite rightly, to ignore you.Did you not realise that?