« on: 10/02/2023 23:01:04 »
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The love failure starts from the root of the problem and adopts several techniques to get rid of the problem. Free love problem solution is a comprehensive program that deals with your every issue related to love, romance and beauty.Looks like your romance with us is off to a rocky start.
Colin2b, if you document the incident frequencies accurately one will not get new frequencies, ie addition and subtraction species unless there is a non linear element present to perform frequency mixing.I understand what you are saying, but additional frequencies do occur in linear systems.
One can throw n+1 radio frequencies at a target and they will remain discrete ….How do you know they remain discrete. Describe the detector that shows them to be discrete or non-discrete.
Hi again,Hi ES
I'm sorry to write on the post again when no-one has had any time to respond yet.
Now the question is: Will the electron make a transition to the new orbital? None of the individual photons from the lasers were of the right frequency for this to happen but will they combine under a superposition of their E and B fields to give you something that will be enough to make the electron jump?
Let's say someone follows a strict diet of cabbage and cheese for let's say a week, what things can/will happen?There used to be a joke in Russia “what is 200m long and eats cabbage - a meat queue”
Cookware - Explore the latest collections of non-stick cookware from Spamcooker. Choose from variety of Fry Pan, Saucepan, Non-stick cookware sets and more at best prices.Oh dear, looks like you have been burned and become non-stick on this site
I like the idea @alancalverd and thank you for your time.Worth having a deep think about Alan’s suggestion. Light doesn’t have mass, so that’s not the source of any energy transfer. When looking at electrons you would expect the charge to be affected by an electric field, which would transfer energy and is certainly the origin of the photoelectric effect. Unless you can think of a better transfer mechanism.
You do seem to be establishing that light carries energy. I'm not sure if it tells me much about light being an oscillation in the E field. If you fired lumps of blu-tack (that's sticky clay stuff - but other brands are available) at a cup of tea so that they just stick to the cup, then you are transferring kinetic energy to the cup. That's got to give you a warm cup of tea eventually. I think that's how they do it at our local Cafe, it takes years and the cup is sticky. I'm fairly sure they don't use oscillating E field blu-tack, just the regular stuff.
Space around me is filled with lots of stuff. The boss calls it clutter.I’m not aware of anyone who thinks space is empty.It is, by definition.
Not to be confused with the universe, which consists of bits of stuff separated by space.
I am also saying that space is not empty and it is completely filled with aether. Basic question is how to find out this aether. As per Classical view of light is that it is a disturbance in space.The classical view is not that light is a disturbance in space.
.Yes that's the right idea @evan_au . Except that you need to take squares, so the probability of a photon passing the filter is 0.5 not 0.71... Under classical field theory (so that is E and B fields) the intensity of light received is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the wave that is transmitted. You resolve the incoming wave into components and get the fraction Cos 45° for the amplitude that is transmitted exactly as you stated. That means Cos2 45° = ½ is the fraction in Intensity. Then you can jump back to the particle and photon interpretation where intensity is just proportional to the number of photons received (per unit time and per unit area of the receiver). Hence, you get the probability ½ for each photon.Yes, you’ve hit on the main reason why a lot of people get confused with the polarisation experiments.
With regard to polarising filters I can't help wondering is there a rotation taking place?You are still looking at this through classical eyes. The problem is that in subsequent measurements you are changing the bases (similar to coordinates) that you are using to take the measurements.
& Obviously Magic ain't Real.It’s real, but it’s not magic.
P.S. - Just out of Curiosity, what about Placebo Effects?
"And I won't blame it solely on Russia, there are two sides to it". Yes, there are two sides to every dispute but that is no excuse to start the obscenity of war.Like you I have been raised, or learnt, that there are two sides to every story. With that comes a distrust of those who say a problem is black or white, no grey. I also distrust marketeers, politicians, propagandists, and all those with a soundclip solution.
You need to read the whole essay Paul. It's about human behaviors. And a game of inequality.No point, it’s a confused mismash of fact, some of which is now out of date, and questionable opinion plus some swallowing of propaganda.
You can read this, a nuanced version, westernized. What Russia thinks about it should be obvious by now. Even for the most hard boiled 'patriots'.It’s nothing to do with patriotism or flag waving. I feel no patriotism for Ukraine, just a deep sadness that a people who want to determine their own future, do away with soviet era corruption, and choose what sources of information they receive, and more, should be subjected to a most horrendous attack and mistreatment. That goes far, far beyond a reasonable response and it is hard to understand why anyone would want to defend that attack.
Doubt it. When schizophrenia is active, symptoms can include delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, trouble with thinking and lack of motivation. Don’t think a round table would be something they would do.Of course he existed. You can see his dining table in Winchester Cathedral. Who makes a dining table for a nonexistent customer?Someone that's schizophrenic.
Then you define it by its affects. You can't pull that definition back to mass/energy itself. In itself it is vague.I don’t know what you mean by “Then you define it by its affects”. If you mean by its effects, then yes, that is science.
Just please publish before i get killed and they delete everything.I am concerned that your life is in danger. For that reason I am going to remove you from this forum and delete your theory in order to protect you.
Perhaps it's Best to BAN such OPs as soon as possible.I am beginning to wonder whether you are right. To prevent harm either mentally or physically to themselves, we might consider doing that. We’ll discuss it.
Would save alot of time of others.
& Also would prevent the wrong emotions from arising within mentally unstable OPs.