1

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: 24/05/2022 12:46:21 »

Recession velocity and cosmological redshift is based on the idea of expansion of space:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recessional_velocity
Recessional velocity is the rate at which an extragalactic astronomical object recedes (becomes more distant) from an observer as a result of the expansion of the universe.[1] It can be measured by observing the wavelength shifts of spectral lines emitted by the object, known as the object's cosmological redshift.
The expansion of the universe is integrated part of the BBT.
I consider that redshift is all about linear velocity stamp that comes with the far end galaxy light
We can still see it due to relative velocity (with ref to the observer as explained by einstein)
Never the less, even without filtering this request of the BBT we can go on.

That's nice, but did you understand that this statement, "If we see a galaxy with a redshift of 11, then this galaxy is moving away from us at 11c" is incorrect?

If all the galaxies that we observe are moving slower than the speed of light

Again, if we can observe the galaxy then obviously its recession velocity is less than c.

then why do they come with so dramatic change in their integrated redshift?

What do you mean by that?

2

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: 24/05/2022 02:31:52 »

If we see a galaxy with a redshift of 11, then this galaxy is moving away from us at 11c.
Do we agree on that starting point?

No, that is not correct.

Recession velocity =
So for z=11, the recession velocity is 295,657,389 m/s.

You know the recession velocity isn't >c because we can see the galaxy!

3

New Theories / Re: Is this why Ivermectin appeared to be the answer to Covid?

« on: 23/05/2022 13:49:27 »

What's the difference between conspiracy theories and the truth?

About 1 year...

Demonstrably false; 911, moon landing, US election...

4

That CAN'T be true! / Re: How do people survive lightning strikes?

« on: 22/05/2022 01:08:08 »

90% of the people survived, that doesn't mean that they were feeling all that great.

5

Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why do I find it easier to run up steep hills than walk up them

« on: 21/05/2022 15:34:07 »

Well, I'm not sure why you find running more comfortable.  As an aside my horse seems to always want to run up steep hills when I ride him instead of walking also.  I am not implying that you are part horse.

6

New Theories / Re: what is temperature?

« on: 21/05/2022 14:46:59 »

Different types of thermometers have their limits in range and linearities. How would you calibrate them against each other, if temperature is not well defined in standardized definition?

After 16 pages you sound more confused about temperature than when you started.   

7

Physiology & Medicine / Re: Why do I find it easier to run up steep hills than walk up them

« on: 21/05/2022 14:40:39 »

So it seems only short people experience this where walking becomes harder than running up steep hills but I can't find find the answer as to why.

Please define the term 'harder' in this case.  If you run a 100 yards up a hill vs walking your heart rate will be higher your body temperature will be elevated and your muscles will produce more lactic acid so I am not sure what you mean.

8

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a net heat exchange between water and ice at 0 degree C?

« on: 21/05/2022 14:29:43 »

May be it's not relevant to the title or theoretical consideration. But it's relevant if we want to get experimental evidence.

A poorly designed and executed experiment gives meaningless results.

9

New Theories / Re: Is life in this Universe a one-off occurrence?

« on: 20/05/2022 17:41:03 »

The LINE hypothesis proposes that the matter-antimatter imbalance that exists in this universe is a consequence of the universal instantiation event (UIE) followed by many cycles of universal expansion and contraction phases. Each cycle is punctuated by a universal transition event (UTE).

This sounds like a Bunch of Crap (BoC).

10

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: relativity paradox or misunderstanding?

« on: 20/05/2022 15:55:42 »

A photon of light leaving such a galaxy will travel any distance in zero time in it's own frame of reference.

A photon does not have a valid inertial rest frame in relativity. 

So the question is will the photon reach the the distant observation post or as the horizon theory would suggest will it be lost forever in the permanently stretching fabric of space?

The photon won't be 'lost' it just will never reach us.  Can a photon just continue on if it never hits something?  Yes.

11

New Theories / Re: Is this why Ivermectin appeared to be the answer to Covid?

« on: 17/05/2022 15:18:17 »

Wasn’t India using a doxycycline and Ivermectin combination for early treatment with good results?

No.

12

New Theories / Re: Re: Is radiation pressure a significant factor in dark energy?

« on: 17/05/2022 13:15:44 »

gravitational fields are formed by ephemeral, tunneling electrons; these electrons appear for roughly one unit of the Planck time in the gravitational field of the object to which they belong, move through space in tandem with the object's rotation, and exchange W particles with protons (if they're within the electroweak range), or absorb/emit a photon, or exchange a neutral current with a neutrino (leading to an oscillation, or change in flavour), depending on the sort of particle they're closest to when tunneling to a new location.

How does that form a gravitational field?

If this is the truth, then it would account for the reflective capacity, via general relativity, of gravitating bodies (since we know, of course, that electrons reflect light).

Where does GR talk about reflective capacity?  Dark matter does not interact with photons but does have a gravitation field, how does that fit into your idea?

Extrapolated to galaxy clusters, as in the vase of 'dark' energy, we could surmise that, since the Big Bang, huge amounts of radiation (photons) have been accumulating between galaxy clusters and the radiation pressure generated has led to the accelerating expansion of the universe.

Wouldn't this radiation be easily measured on Earth?

13

General Science / Re: Is it safe to transport hydrogen gas compressed into a water tank?

« on: 15/05/2022 18:27:01 »

I didnt get to the part what to use to build it. The idea to compress hydrogen into water as a preventative matter. And bigger the capacity.

Are you saying you want to dissolve hydrogen into the water?

14

General Science / Re: Is it safe to transport hydrogen gas compressed into a water tank?

« on: 15/05/2022 15:08:13 »

Is it safe to transport hydrogen gas compressed into water tank?

The quick answer is no.  Water tanks are not designed to hold compressed hydrogen.

15

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is this a paradox in general relativity?

« on: 14/05/2022 20:57:17 »

Now my thought experiment is about what might happen if an object moves really fast in front of the nose of the ship where the lower clock/event is.  To make the object appear in front of the nose almost instantaneously, we will say that it came from another spatial dimension z going into your screen.  For simplicity sake, let's say this interaction happens at the lower clock/event (where the nose of the ship is).

I'm not getting this scenario.  Does the intercepting object have to be moving very fast or can the scenario be that the ship hits a pebble.

16

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is this a paradox in general relativity?

« on: 14/05/2022 20:45:02 »

The 3 events are the 3 clocks that I was referring to.

As far as I could see there were only 2 clocks, one on the ship and one on the ground.

17

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: 14/05/2022 16:43:05 »

Anyone that ignores the observation makes a stupid assumption.

So stop doing that.

Why do you think that we should ignore the clear observation of those messy eater SMBH?

What do you mean by messy eater?

Why do you think that the most-distant-quasar can eat its total food in just 570 MY while all the other SMBH that we clearly observe can't eat even 0.00...1 in a similar time frame?

I don't think that.  Why do you think, "while all the other SMBH that we clearly observe can't eat even 0.00...1 in a similar time frame"?

18

New Theories / Re: What is the real meaning of the most-distant-quasar/galaxy?

« on: 14/05/2022 15:17:54 »

So we can easily calculate the estimate growth rate of a SMBH.
Let's assume that by average we get 4 M solar mass per 12BY.
Based on that understanding we can estimate the time frame that is needed for a SMBH to gain 1.6 B solar mass.
1.6 B / 4 M * 12 BY = 400 BY

So you have proved if you make a stupid assumption you get a stupid answer.  I'm pretty sure everybody already knew that.

19

Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Is there a net heat exchange between water and ice at 0 degree C?

« on: 14/05/2022 14:52:20 »

Have you heard that someone defined pi = 3?

I'm beginning to think you enjoy the feeling of being confused.  You now seem to not even know what a definition is.  I don't get you at all.

20

New Theories / Re: On How Temperature Might Enter The Friedmann Equation

« on: 13/05/2022 21:44:14 »

Almost fixed the latex sorry!

Don't worry, your stuff is all garbage anyway and you should be banned in a short time.