Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Attached file: NonStandard-thinking.zip [Downloaded 0 times].It looks like the file didn't link properly.
The dust particles ("elemental ether units" in my Michelson Morley analogy) are inertially insignificant relative to the motion of the car (photon.) MMX had been searching for a more readily-detectable interaction than that, in their assumption about how interaction with an ether medium would influence the passage of a light beam.The ether was what use to be thought of as the medium for light. That is the light waves were transmitted through the ether, just like water waves are transmitted through water.
Now I see the problem the coming into existence at the very start is as the big bang theory so this is matter that is not living and therefore it is dead. Then the thinking / conscious universe is the second state coming into being so the dead but existing universe began to develop into a conscious entity.Why is this in new theories? This clearly is not a theory or a hypothesis, this is a wag at best. This should be moved to 'that can't be true'.
I didn't say that electrons are not "natural." -What I tried to convey is that electrons appeared cosmically in natural settings, whereas muons, bosons, quarks, etc. are units that have been found under artificial technological settings (Physics Lab, accelerator/collider)That statement is wrong. The photons from the sun are bosons; do think those are 'not natural'? All subatomic particles are natural. Again you should be asking questions about physics if you are interested, not making random false statements.
in my Model, all quantum units have been originally formed starting from elemental ether unitsThat is just something you made up with zero evidence.
A universal underlying vibratory ether preceded a later creationally-designed superimposed quantum dynamic. In my Creation model, electrons were the key units creationally projected, toward an ether region, in order to chain-reactionally produce our quantum world of electrons, protons, neutrons, and atoms. -As electrons coursed through the ether, their vibrations aligned the vibrations of the elemental ether units, ,which in turn caused them to entrain with each other, which is how larger units like quantum units and atoms originally were formed, in what I referred to as a "natural" cosmic process to distinguish it from those units found using accelerator/colliders.That is just gibberish with some 'sciency' sounding words. It is meaningless.
The electron I was referring to would be the kind physicists find occurring naturallyWell that shouldn't be a problem since every single electron is naturally occurring.
and is the smallest one found occurring naturallyThis also shouldn't be a problem since all electrons are the same size.
This "natural" group of energic units does not include so-called "particle units," like muons, bosons, and the like) produced in laboratory procedures or with accelerator/collider procedures.)Again this should be easy since bosons and muons are not electrons.
In my ether-based modelYou don't have a model.
Ho despises and ridicules atheists and for what reason?It is just a post by a deranged serial troll named Dennis Markuze, pay him no mind.
If there was no repulsive energy then we would fall into the black hole or on the sun. So yes there is energy that pushes us as much as gravity attracts usFirst, I think you are doing pretty well with your use of English.
Are the continents floatingNot on water!
The entire text was a repeat of a previous post by another member.Maybe the plagiarized post was from his previous life...
Ok. I have surrendered to defeat I feel that all the information I have received from quite a few has changed my understanding of the principle actions of sound and movement through a solid.Good.
I believe in my statement until proven otherwise. As the speed of sound has been analysed as it travels through different medians but the speed of movement has not been analysed nor has it been compared in any scientific way and the more I think about how it could be analysed the more complicated it becomes so good luck if anyone wishes to try.Your belief is wrong. This has been analyzed, experiments have been done. If you had a 1000 ft steel rod and smacked one end with a ram, it would take 1/10 of a second before the other end would move, that is a fact your belief is irrelevant.
Let's say Jane went shopping and picked up a thing that required her to evaluate an integral over a closed path on the complex plane. Alternatively consider John, who was out walking in the sunshine when he had a need to generate an infinite sequence of numbers that are co-prime but not primes. Where are these people going to get help with their serious problems?Well, they could just sign up to a math forum.
Specifically, the theory that the entire Universe originated from a single tiny particle seems absurd, and unscientific.. Where's the evidence for it?What is absurd is you saying there is no evidence. Have you not simply googled "evidence for the big bang"?
Inorganic chemistry deals with the synthesis and behavior of inorganic and organometallic compounds. This field covers chemical compounds that are not carbon-based, which are the subjects of organic chemistry. The distinction between the two disciplines is far from absolute, as there is much overlap in the subdiscipline of organometallic chemistry. It has applications in every aspect of the chemical industry, including catalysis, materials science, pigments, surfactants, coatings, medications, fuels, and agriculture.Resurrecting an almost 18 year old thread just to write a definition of inorganic chemistry? Really?
I have my own domains and websites and track my own stats relative to my mailings to different groups. So go stuff it. I don't put up with AH's who call me a liar. Look what a damn fool you have made of yourself so far today. Nasty minded, vicious, IdiotI realize you have invested a lot of time and energy into your ideas so it is disappointing when you are shown that those ideas are wrong, but golly you shouldn't go bonkers, just step back and realize you can still just learn real physics and further your understanding of the universe that way.
SR does not say thatI kind of admire you for taking the time to read Puppypowers ramblings, hopefully you did not read CrazyScientist post in the same time frame, that could have a negative impact on anyone's IQ. I think there should be a pseudoscience overload warning when those two have consecutive posts.
83333,83363Isn't exciting to see how many search bots have viewed this thread. By stopping in occasionally to post a pointless comment the thread is put first in unread posts so you get more views, which is the point, I guess. Well I hope it makes you feel important and listened to. Now you can go away for a few months...
Crystal light is a sweet drink and has different flavors for different taste-buds. It is a flavor to enhance the taste of water. It is exactly what you need when you are dehydrated and bored with the basic taste of plain water. It can be your friend at a party! You can mix a dose of crystal light with any other beverage like Vodka.I'll bet crystal lite tastes better than your degreaser.
RX Spam was established in 1996 in Mumbai, India; as chemical manufacturing company catering exclusively to the needs of the pork industry. In a short span of 12 years the company has established itself as one of the leading wholesale suppliers of a wide range of chemicals for - Pork industry internationally - and other local industires and plants. Our client list bears testimony to this. The DAMNSPAM policy has its foundations on two pillars of strength - a continuous investment in research and development to deliver premium quality products and a commitment to service.
[urhttp://rxm.DamnSpam[/url]