The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of BilboGrabbins
  3. Show Posts
  4. Thanked Posts
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - BilboGrabbins

Pages: [1]
1
New Theories / Re: How Many Numbers Exist?
« on: 14/10/2021 19:08:11 »
Quote from: Zer0 on 14/10/2021 18:47:21
@BilboGrabbins

Hi there!
🙋

I have a Query, Especially for You.
Interested?

A_______B

A simple line.
Start point A.
End point B.

I suppose i can keep dividing it into Halves.

But considering Planck's Length, Can i Divide it until Infinity?

If i Know the Line's point of Origin(A) & am Aware of the Line's point of Cessation(B)...Does that sound like Infinity?

Or if i didn't know the Origin, n was clueless bout the End.
Infinity!

Ps - Thanks E_S for the suggestions.
I've Realized my capacity to understand & learn is Not infinite.
Hence i do not bother myself, & also spare Others of goin thru the troubles of explaining me things which i Firmly Believe i shall never understand.
(Reason i Request for short & brief answers, i Hate it when Teachers waste their Precious Time on Futile Things)
: )

No, to divide through the Planck length infinitely many times would be equivelent to a singularity. That is itself equivelent to a breakdown in physics.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

2
New Theories / Re: How Many Numbers Exist?
« on: 13/10/2021 22:27:22 »
Quote from: Eternal Student on 13/10/2021 22:11:00
Hi again.

Quote from: BilboGrabbins on 13/10/2021 18:40:57
I'm aware of this thought experiment... And no. You cannot divide infinitely. There is a physical stop sign in physics .
What physical stop sign in physics?   Are you talking about an indivisible planck length?  This was mentioned in reply #53.  Otherwise lengths such as those in the tortoise and hare experiment or angles such as in Bored Chemist's example can be divided more times than any finite number of times (which is fair description of infintely many times) and it can often all be done within a finite amount of time.

Best Wishes.

Yes the Planck length. This is the ground rule that prevents  continuous divisibility.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

3
New Theories / Re: How Many Numbers Exist?
« on: 13/10/2021 18:40:57 »
Eternal Student,

I'm aware of this thought experiment... And no. You cannot divide infinitely. There is a physical stop sign in physics . Again, infinities are not physical things.
The following users thanked this post: Zer0

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.07 seconds with 30 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.