The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Life Sciences
  3. Physiology & Medicine
  4. How far back in my family history do genetic traits go?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How far back in my family history do genetic traits go?

  • 4 Replies
  • 19082 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline colarris (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 78
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
How far back in my family history do genetic traits go?
« on: 24/07/2013 22:24:19 »
When it comes to inheriting family traits from a previous generation how far can the genetic history go back to? Do my genes store traits from every generation in my families past?
« Last Edit: 30/07/2013 15:56:40 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 162 times
    • View Profile
Re: Genetic traits
« Reply #1 on: 25/07/2013 07:32:15 »
Quote from: colarris on 24/07/2013 22:24:19
When it comes to inheriting family traits from a previous generation how far can the genetic history go back to?

At least a couple of hundred thousand years ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve


Further back than that if you don't restrict your ancestors to human ...
Quote
Molecular evidence shows that some limited number of Hox genes have existed in the Cnidaria since before the earliest true Bilatera, making these genes pre-Paleozoic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeobox#Hox_genes
« Last Edit: 25/07/2013 07:49:43 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 59 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Genetic traits
« Reply #2 on: 25/07/2013 08:43:44 »
You could also look at it this way.

How much of your father's genes do you carry?
1/2 Paternal genes, 1/2 of the Maternal genes.

You Grandfather's genes?
1/4

Great Grandfather's genes?
1/8

And so on and so forth.  After 100 generations, the total amount inherited from any single ancestor is mighty small, although undoubtedly there would be some inbreeding in 100 generations so a single individual might contribute to multiple branches of a family tree.

There would be some exceptions to the rule. 

For a male, you can follow the Y chromosome back through each successive male generation (father, grandfather, great grandfather, great great grandfather, etc) with essentially 100% inheritance (plus the occasional random mutation).

Likewise, you can follow your mitochondrial DNA through successive female generations (Mother, grandmother, great grandmother, etc) with essentially 100% inheritance (plus random mutations).

That means that genetic diseases or conditions on the Y chromosome and Mitochondria also have a very simple inheritance pattern. 

Some X-associated conditions like baldness can be generation skipping, being passed from the Maternal grandfather to the son, skipping the mother.

Some human traits such as skin color involve several genes, and tend to follow a dilution pattern of inheritance.

You will, of course, have inherited all your genes (except those with new mutations) from at least one ancestor....
Logged
 

Offline colarris (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 78
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Genetic traits
« Reply #3 on: 25/07/2013 10:08:20 »
Thats great, thanks for the info.
Logged
 

Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 59 times
  • Site Moderator
    • View Profile
Re: Genetic traits
« Reply #4 on: 25/07/2013 19:23:46 »
If there were no crossovers...  And you have 46 chromosomes (23 pairs), then once you had 46 ancestors (6 generations gives 64 ancestors), some of the ancestors would not be donating whole chromosomes.

However, during meiosis, crossovers allow the new chromosomes to be composites of the old ones so you are still a composite of all your ancestors (except, as mentioned the Y chromosome and Mitochondrial DNA are passed through the paternal and maternal lineage).
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Why would you burn coal, then turn the carbon dioxide back into "coal"?

Started by evan_auBoard Chemistry

Replies: 9
Views: 5031
Last post 08/03/2019 08:44:55
by chris
What does "the oil will settle back into the ground" mean?

Started by CliffordKBoard The Environment

Replies: 1
Views: 5468
Last post 21/06/2012 12:18:51
by evan_au
Is it possible to convert electric energy into light energy then back?

Started by skoorbBoard General Science

Replies: 5
Views: 11125
Last post 27/09/2017 20:15:08
by alancalverd
Will cold foods make a cold (viral infection) come back?

Started by Mickael ElmalemBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 1
Views: 6223
Last post 26/03/2011 23:20:13
by Jolly- Joliver
Why does IE appear to skip google results when hitting "Back"?

Started by chrisBoard Geek Speak

Replies: 4
Views: 6530
Last post 04/12/2011 14:31:40
by SeanB
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.09 seconds with 43 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.