The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Neutrino mass could have been discovered without Neutrino Oscillations?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Neutrino mass could have been discovered without Neutrino Oscillations?

  • 1 Replies
  • 4642 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Diogo_Afonso_Leitao (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 22
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Neutrino mass could have been discovered without Neutrino Oscillations?
« on: 15/02/2016 19:22:15 »
Hello everyone!

I just had a little thought in the decay of the W Boson. I read an article saying it could decay into one kind of neutrino and a positron, anti-muon or anti-tau. However, these are different particles with different masses. The law of conservation of energy says that the mass before the decay has to be the same as the mass after the decay. So, if positrons, anti-muons and anti-taus have different masses, the three neutrinos need to have different masses aswell for the law of conservation of energy to work.
Therefore, we confirm at least two of the kinds of neutrinos are massive.

What do you think?
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10751
  • Activity:
    19%
  • Thanked: 1384 times
    • View Profile
Re: Neutrino mass could have been discovered without Neutrino Oscillations?
« Reply #1 on: 15/02/2016 21:02:20 »
Quote from: Diogo_Afonso_Leitao
So, if positrons, anti-muons and anti-taus have different masses, the three neutrinos need to have different masses as well for the law of conservation of energy to work.
The energy carried away from a nuclear decay is in the form of:
- the particles' "rest-mass", for which you have to bring the particle to rest. You can consider this mass to have an equivalent energy, according to Einstein's iconic E=mc2
- the particles' "kinetic energy". You can consider this energy to have an equivalent mass, according to Einstein's iconic E=mc2. (...although physicists prefer to talk about momentum rather than kinetic energy)

The energy of the decay is divided among the debris in a somewhat random way, with the kinetic energy of the neutrino mostly far exceeding it's rest mass.

Take the example of neutron decay, which is better-understood than Higgs decay, with much lower energy: n0 → p+ + e− + νe + 0.78MeV
In some cases, the electron carries off almost all the energy; in other cases, the neutrino carries off almost all the energy.

However, the mass of the neutrino is thought to be somewhere around 0.1-0.25eV (it's really hard to measure).

So a neutron decay where the neutrino rest mass is 0.1eV, and the kinetic energy is anywhere up to 782,343eVą13,000eV makes it really hard to pin down the rest mass of the neutrino. The error bars are far larger than the thing you are trying to measure!

Trying to pin down the rest mass of 3 neutrinos from the very infrequent (and very high energy: 126GeV) decay of the Higgs is even more problematic.

Other experiments have constrained the difference in mass of the different neutrino types, and it appears that they are fairly similar to each other. So distinguishing the masses via different paths of Higgs decay is especially tricky!

For current guesstimates of neutrino mass, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino#Mass
It is hoped that the KATRIN & MARE experiments should pin down the mass of the electron neutrino more accurately, over the next couple of years.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Diogo_Afonso_Leitao



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Can black holes lose enough mass to stop being black holes?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 17
Views: 16775
Last post 21/08/2012 07:57:00
by Emc2
Can you have two objects have equal density but not equal mass??

Started by VereavaBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 16
Views: 47229
Last post 25/10/2010 01:02:15
by Vereava
Split from "The law of conservation of mass?"

Started by PmbBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 9844
Last post 22/10/2011 22:31:33
by Pmb
"On the concept of relativistic mass"

Started by PmbBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 5509
Last post 24/07/2013 15:17:00
by Pmb
Does "point mass" make sense?

Started by itisusBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 5
Views: 7227
Last post 21/03/2009 21:48:31
by yor_on
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.109 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.