The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Where will genetic science be in five years?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Where will genetic science be in five years?

  • 2 Replies
  • 1079 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline podcastmaker (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 12
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Where will genetic science be in five years?
« on: 15/10/2020 09:46:02 »
Where will genetic science be in five years?
Logged
 



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10240
  • Activity:
    32.5%
  • Thanked: 1229 times
    • View Profile
Re: Where will genetic science be in five years?
« Reply #1 on: 17/10/2020 11:53:10 »
Reading Genes
The cost of DNA sequencing is dropping exponentially.

Having plummeted between 2007 and 2011, it is now again tracking roughly parallel with Moore's Law - but that is still a (negative) exponential decline in costs..

https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Sequencing-Human-Genome-cost

That is the raw cost of DNA sequencing; understanding what the DNA is saying is still difficult and expensive; when seeking the significance of the many unique mutations in any individual, the answer is often "nobody knows".

I am hoping that with the exponential decline in costs, there will be an exponential increase in the number of people being sequenced, which will lead to improved understanding of what many gene variants actually do.

We are only now starting to map the regulatory pathways in DNA, and this often has just as much impact on the individual's health as the DNA letters. A harmful genetic variant which is always turned off is no longer harmful (in that generation).

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlson_curve

Writing Genes
Since the discovery of CRISPR/CAS9, the ability to modify genes has improved dramatically.
- But it's still a bit like doing surgery with a chainsaw - you may modify the gene you expect, but you are also likely to do a lot of collateral damage in nearby regions of the genome.
- In the current state of play, you would only use CRISPR/CAS9 in organisms where you were prepared to have a lot of trials and errors - pharmaceutical-producing yeast, lab mice and agricultural animals and crops.
- Fears and laws currently ban or limit genetically-engineered organisms or products in many parts of the world

With improved versions of gene editing tools (there is a reason that CAS9 is numbered #9), it may be possible to do much more precise changes.
- In 5 years time, I expect that far more gene-modifying treatments will be available
- But it will need to get a lot better before people trust it with germ-line modification in humans.

Applications
SARS-COV-2 analysis was a triumph of genetic sequencing (RNA , in this case, rather than DNA)
- It is likely that the upcoming SARS-COV-2 vaccinations will be the first mass deployment of a genetically-engineered product in history

This will probably pave the way for further applications (if politicians don't rush unready products to market, greedy businesses don't deploy product which they know to be dangerous, religious leaders don't denounce it as an abomination, and social media thought leaders don't all suddenly become anti-vaxxers...).

In 5 years time, I expect that the state of genetic technologies will be roughly 5 times better than they are now.
- But whether public acceptance will be better or worse is anyone's guess!
Logged
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7981
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 282 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Where will genetic science be in five years?
« Reply #2 on: 17/10/2020 16:40:30 »
CRISPR, the gene editing technique, won the Nobel Prize this year; this is one indicator of the pace at which this field is advancing. I suspect that within 10 years we will be sequencing people routinely at birth; that might happen within the next 5 years, especially with Covid-19 stimulating an interest in the human genome...
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

"DNA Diets" : Are they junk science?

Started by mydietingwayBoard General Science

Replies: 5
Views: 7608
Last post 27/03/2021 18:09:43
by Zer0
Can you still donate your body to science? Are there any "bits" they don't want?

Started by paul.frBoard General Science

Replies: 14
Views: 15690
Last post 15/04/2022 09:54:01
by Tsm3696Monkey
"Simple" Rocket Science: Where have I gone wrong?

Started by harrogate22Board General Science

Replies: 2
Views: 8780
Last post 06/01/2008 16:33:26
by lyner
Simple Motor - Homopolar motor - Kitchen Science

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 6231
Last post 24/11/2016 23:55:16
by thedoc
How realistic is the science on "Star Trek" (and other SF?)

Started by cluelessBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 24
Views: 6967
Last post 09/03/2020 17:53:01
by instagyu
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.166 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.