[Bored chemist]

The Which-Way experiment is an overwhelming direct evidence.

It's very clearly not.
If it was even "fairly good" proof, then people would accept it.
We don't.

[hamdani yusuf]

Then, since God, by definition, CANNOT lie

Whose definition is that? In many religious books, god lied many times.
In your case, it makes your god not omnipotent.

[hamdani yusuf]

How do you explain the fact that every time ( thousand times) you do a Which-Way experiment with a polarizer placed in front of the detector, you always get an interference pattern?

Have you done the experiment?

[Hal (OP)]

How do you explain the fact that every time ( thousand times) you do a Which-Way experiment with a polarizer placed in front of the detector, you always get an interference pattern?

Have you done the experiment?

No, I haven't done the experiment. I know that others have done the experiment many times.

[Hal (OP)]

The Which-Way experiment is an overwhelming direct evidence.

It's very clearly not.
If it was even "fairly good" proof, then people would accept it.
We don't.

Physicists have been puzzled by quantum phenomena for decades and still have no explanation. Now this theory has been proposed and people reject it. Our prejudices always get in the way of rational thinking.

[Bored chemist]

Our prejudices always get in the way of rational thinking.

Correct.

[Hal (OP)]

Then, since God, by definition, CANNOT lie

Whose definition is that? In many religious books, god lied many times.
In your case, it makes your god not omnipotent.

Can you mention just one instance when God 'lied' ? 

But to say that God 'lies' is the same as saying God doesn’t exist. I guess that is what you mean. But I have proposed a proof of God's existence by quantum phenomena.  Or do you believe that God exists? In that case your statement is self contradicting.

So, if you believe God exists, then you must also accept He cannot lie. If you believe God doesn't exist, then you should provide an alternative explanation for the Which-Way experiment.

The problem is that when people think about religion they don't try to apply at least some level of rigor as they do to physics/science. This is because they think that religion is ridiculous and is not worth thinking about. They reject religion outright. I think this attitude has its roots in the fact that religion has been misrepresented in many ways for centuries.

[hamdani yusuf]

The problem is that when people think about religion they don't try to apply at least some level of rigor as they do to physics/science. This is because they think that religion is ridiculous and is not worth thinking about. They reject religion outright. I think this attitude has its roots in the fact that religion has been misrepresented in many ways for centuries.

How many religions have you studied deeply? What are their similarities and difference?

[hamdani yusuf]

Can you mention just one instance when God 'lied' ?

which god are you referring to?

I just search for lies in wikipedia.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie

  The Old Testament and New Testament of the Bible both contain statements that God cannot lie and that lying is immoral (Num. 23:19,[54] Hab. 2:3,[55] Heb. 6:13–18).[56] Nevertheless, there are examples of God deliberately causing enemies to become disorientated and confused, in order to provide victory (2 Thess. 2:11;[57][58] 1 Kings 22:23;[59] Ezek. 14:9).[60]