0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Black hole on 16/10/2021 03:36:37Of course we'll just ignore Newtons Third Law and Coulombs law then and forget that a Higgs field or atoms potentially have the components to push back ?Nothing about free protons or free electrons violates any of the laws of physics. You'd know that if you were an actual physics professor (but you're not, are you?).Quote from: Black hole on 16/10/2021 03:36:37Can you please provide a link to your claims ?https://www.britannica.com/science/cathode-rayQuote from: Black hole on 16/10/2021 03:36:37You'll find that what you are suggesting are not true proton beams or electrons beams , the physics of the universe does not allow for the momentum of free electrons or protons .And so I see that you are still stuck on that same nonsense about protons and electrons. You talked about this same thing when you were here last time. And yet you think I can't recognize that you're Thebox? I'd straight up ban you, but I need to convince the other moderators that it's you first. Unfortunately, I'm occupied with other things at the moment so that will have to wait. Enjoy your time here while you have it.
Of course we'll just ignore Newtons Third Law and Coulombs law then and forget that a Higgs field or atoms potentially have the components to push back ?
Can you please provide a link to your claims ?
You'll find that what you are suggesting are not true proton beams or electrons beams , the physics of the universe does not allow for the momentum of free electrons or protons .
As I have said previous you are really only relying on what is written rather than the physical facts .
An electron surrounded by electrons can not physically be displaced because the confinement is equal and proportional to the surrounding protons attraction .
In quantum field theory , a HIggs field has to be likewise in polarity to atomic matter or there'd be a stationary visual universe . No body would be in motion and that is based on the electrodynamics of moving bodies .
An electron surrounded by electrons can not physically be displaced because the confinement is equal and proportional to the surrounding protons attraction .In quantum field theory , a HIggs field has to be likewise in polarity to atomic matter or there'd be a stationary visual universe . No body would be in motion and that is based on the electrodynamics of moving bodies .
Quote from: Black hole on 16/10/2021 03:52:30As I have said previous you are really only relying on what is written rather than the physical facts .If they were (and they aren't, btw) they would still be doing better than you. You are relying on dross which you made up without knowing the facts.
QuoteMore nonsense. The Higgs field doesn't have a polarity. It's electrically neutral.Hooray , finally you've got something correct ! Indeed the HIggs field does not have a single polarity or the movement of bodies would not be possible . The Higgs field would have too have two poles , a negative and a positive pole that converged to create an electrical neutral pole , like wise and equal too: E = Can you explain to the readers what pole an Electron and Proton field convergence creates ?
More nonsense. The Higgs field doesn't have a polarity. It's electrically neutral.
The Higgs field would have too have two poles
Quote from: Black hole on 16/10/2021 15:59:36The Higgs field would have too have two polesNo, it doesn't.
If force +ve is equal to force -ve then the momentum of the mass is ?
I am starting to think I have entered some alternative reality on this forum , the people replying do not seem to be able to think . It is interesting that I am using facts , simple facts such as Coulombs laws .This is the first time I believe you have replied and again it lacks impression for a science post .Fact one :Every substance in the Universe is energy relative to spaceFact two: The energy of any volume is divided proportionally throughout the volume .Fact three: E=/tIt is absurd for any of you too deny these simple physics facts !