[Black hole (OP)]

Mark wants to know:

Since the Universe is expanding and light stretches across it as it does so becoming more red, what happens to the lost energy when the shorter wavelength, higher energy light towards the blue end of the spectrum is shifted into lower energy red wavelengths?

Do you know the answer?

There is no lost energy t   high frequency photon energy divided by volume over time at c . 450nm has the same energy has 750nm but it is divided by a greater volume. In linear terms = in regards to the energy amount .

[Kryptid]

450nm has the same energy has 750nm

No, it doesn't. A photon with a wavelength of 450 nanometers has (750 nm/450 nm = ~1.67) times as much energy as a photon with a wavelength of 750 nanometers.

[Black hole (OP)]

450nm has the same energy has 750nm

No, it doesn't. A photon with a wavelength of 450 nanometers has (750 nm/450 nm = ~1.67) times as much energy as a photon with a wavelength of 750 nanometers.

Something else you misunderstood in physics class I assume ?

Have you ever stretched an elastic band ?

E=

E=

Do you see that although 1 is stretched that the energy of stays the same ?

You're not considering the summation !

[Kryptid]

Have you ever stretched an elastic band ?

Photons are not elastic bands.

[Black hole (OP)]

Have you ever stretched an elastic band ?

Photons are not elastic bands.

I would not be too sure on that as energy seems very diverse these days  . The point is if you shun a beam of blue light on an object for example 1 second, the shorter wave length , a red light beam would deliver the same amount of energy but it would take nanoseconds longer because of the longer wave .
Consider this example as pulses of light rather than a constant beam .



 

[Kryptid]

The point is if you shun a beam of blue light on an object for example 1 second, the shorter wave length , a red light beam would deliver the same amount of energy but it would take nanoseconds longer because of the longer wave .
Consider this example as pulses of light rather than a constant beam .

What do you mean by "shun"?

A photon with a shorter wavelength has more energy than a photon with a longer wavelength. That is a fact. The energy of a photon is given by E = hf, where "f" is the frequency. Since all light travels at the same speed in a vacuum, frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength.

[Black hole (OP)]

The point is if you shun a beam of blue light on an object for example 1 second, the shorter wave length , a red light beam would deliver the same amount of energy but it would take nanoseconds longer because of the longer wave .
Consider this example as pulses of light rather than a constant beam .

What do you mean by "shun"?

A photon with a shorter wavelength has more energy than a photon with a longer wavelength. That is a fact. The energy of a photon is given by E = hf, where "f" is the frequency. Since all light travels at the same speed in a vacuum, frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength.

''Shun'' means shine !
As I explained already =

If you are stretching anything by force , the energy is divided but remains the same value .

You are talking about magnitude as opposed quantity!

[Kryptid]

As I explained already =

If you are stretching anything by force , the energy is divided but remains the same value .

You are talking about magnitude as opposed quantity!

Stretching an elastic band actually adds energy to it, so even in your elastic band analogy the energy isn't the same.

Besides, E=hf proves you are wrong about photons, so I don't know why you are still going on about this.