0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Entropy still exists at absolute zero.
If we could extract the entropic energy within a mole of water molecules, the order would break down and it would look more random to the naked eye.
Natural selection is a type of container
If we had a purely random driven mutation model there would do more wrong choices than good.
Does this answer evolution-deniers?Since the doubt in evolution is not based on logic, logic cannot be used to convince them.
Quote from: puppypower on 24/02/2022 15:18:45If we had a purely random driven mutation model there would do more wrong choices than good. It does.They die.The few lucky ones go onto dominate the next generation.So you are trying to wedge entropy- which you do not understand- into a discussion about natural selection - which you also do not understand.Why do you do this?
Natural selection is not a random process.
I prefer the analogy where the technicians know what they are doing
Quote from: puppypower on 25/02/2022 16:00:36Natural selection is not a random process.No.But the mutation is random (or, at least nearly so, and evolution would work with random mutations.)Quote from: puppypower on 25/02/2022 16:00:36 I prefer the analogy where the technicians know what they are doingNeither I, nor reality, cares about your preference.
. The proof of the latter, which has been around since the 1950's, is that you cannot substitute any other solvent, for the water
Maybe someone can explain how statistics can account for the observation that no other solvent can be substituted for water, in water based life?
that does not allow one to think in a rational way.
There are two aspects of evolution; macro-scale and nanoscale.
Why does modern biology use a random approach to evolution at the nanoscale, and call that valid, when Darwin never suggested this?
water, that has up to four hydrogen bonds each.
the Alchemists often projected their own internal psychology into nature,
So I decided to use their mystical science
Yet we are told water is not that important in terms of making things work.
Quote from: puppypower on 02/03/2022 12:17:55Yet we are told water is not that important in terms of making things work.I know of literally no one who has said such a thing.
If water was treated as it should be, mutation analysis would be required to include a water analysis for its half of the total affect.
I am not against evolution,
A better way of phrasing this
Quote from: puppypower on 04/03/2022 16:14:06If water was treated as it should be, mutation analysis would be required to include a water analysis for its half of the total affect. Do you realise that's bollocks?Quote from: puppypower on 04/03/2022 16:14:06I am not against evolution,Then why not learn it?I still think there's should be a thread set up to divert PP's off- topic ramblings and hijacks to.
The current version of evolution should...
Explain why water is not included in every analysis for evolution
If we place lipids in water, the water-oil affect causes these organics to get with the water program and form a bi-layered shell