0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: puppypower on 05/03/2022 16:21:35The current version of evolution should... You have made it clear that you don't understand the theory.Quote from: puppypower on 05/03/2022 16:21:35Explain why water is not included in every analysis for evolutionBecause evolution is about change and the water is constant.
The current version of evolution should...
Explain why water is not included in every analysis for evolution
Therefore you need to throw dice to account for the mystery of naked DNA being active.
What you said was correct;
Water is unique in that has two hydrogen bonding donors and two hydrogen bonding acceptors.
They can only possibly look like one of their parents since their parents will not look identical. That's OK, I'm sure you would accept that looking like one of the parents would be a good enough criterion.
Not a good argument since "species" is undefined.
Speciation appears to be an occasional consequence of evolution
That is not proven.
Then where do you think it comes from?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/04/2022 12:49:47Then where do you think it comes from?From imagination.
Not a good argument since "species" is undefined. It's a label we apply wherever it is convenient.
From imagination.
Quote from: alancalverd on 03/04/2022 20:47:23Not a good argument since "species" is undefined.Astonishing how far you would go to defend your beliefs.
Explain why water is not included in every analysis for evolution, and why anyone thinks the impact of water can be approximated by rolling dice?