The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Is a Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles the answer to a TOE
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Is a Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles the answer to a TOE
1 Replies
631 Views
3 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Spring Theory
(OP)
Sr. Member
103
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 3 times
Is a Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles the answer to a TOE
«
on:
22/12/2023 15:57:14 »
Going to give this forum another chance for polite feedback. I have updated my theory of everything which explains the following:
The nature of spacetime
Quantum gravity and unification with electromagnetic force
The reason for antimatter scarcity
A physical description for the Wave Function and therefore a solution to the measurement problem
A definition of mass and force
An explanation of dark Matter
A more precise Lorentz dilation equation
The reason for the electron?s anomalous magnetic moment
A physical description of the Fine Structure Constant
Many others
My first paper's abstract:
Current quantum theory is based on probability and includes a myriad of fields, forces and force carrying particles. The principle cornerstone of physics is to determine observable values from experiments that match quantum calculations. There are several particles classified as fundamental such as the electron, the quark and the photon. The cloud of uncertainty (principle) around quantum physics has kept any deterministic explanation from been accepted in the physics community. This paper sets the groundwork to connect quantum physics with classical physics concepts.
First principles define the photon as the single fundamental particle that all other particles are made from. A geometric analysis of the photon and its measured properties are used to derive a mass equation. Mass is defined as a function of curvature and the velocity along that curvature. This mass equation is used to derive the equations of motion based on the principle of least action. The semi complete Lagrangian of the photon presented leads to Euler-Lagrange equations that agree with its measured properties. The kinetic energy of the presented Lagrangian also directly leads to the Einstein Planck relation.
Taking these first principles and applying various thought experiments, explanations are revealed including the double slit experiment, vacuum energy, the Casimir effect and a potential contributor to Dark Matter. A testable prediction resulting from the Ring Theory hypothesis is that the photons resulting from decaying particles have an offset in trajectory. The trajectory is based on the geometry of the ring based particle.
The final takeaway is that Ring Theory lays the foundation for the photon to geometrically present positive charges, negative charges, positive masses and magnetic moments that appear in particles previously considered to be fundamental.
Here is the full paper:
https://acct89456.app.netsuite.com/core/media/media.nl?id=11245&c=ACCT89456&h=QJmsw4-9zydXKSC5cKdu4TMeVg3heptvZM8n4z3fYZOeuA4q&_xt=.pdf
Thanks for reading this and let me know what you think.
Logged
The following users thanked this post:
Zer0
pzkpfw
Sr. Member
121
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 10 times
Re: Is a Deterministic Ring Theory of Particles the answer to a TOE
«
Reply #1 on:
22/12/2023 17:48:34 »
Cross reference:
https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/133106-the-deterministic-ring-theory-of-particles/
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
theory of everything
/
grand unification theory
/
photon structure
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...