Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 30/03/2019 17:05:23
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76559.0
Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 30/03/2019 17:23:41
Post by: Kryptid on 30/03/2019 20:08:58
Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 31/03/2019 06:05:53
Can you elaborate?The non-sense here compared to my logic.A new theory is difficult one has to have deep thinking . No theory here is supported with logic .
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 09:33:36
All theories here are invalid except mine:You have not provided any evidence that you have a "theory".
You have some poorly framed ideas.
A theory is much more than that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
Post by: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:01:51
No theory here is supported with logic .
And what makes you say that?
Post by: guest39538 on 31/03/2019 15:03:45
All theories here are invalid except mine:Actually , all theories here or anywhere else are invalid except mine . My theory is absolute .
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76559.0
Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:14:07
It's obvious.No theory here is supported with logic .
And what makes you say that?
Post by: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:15:46
It's obvious.
I'm afraid it isn't.
Post by: guest39538 on 31/03/2019 15:19:26
It's obvious.No theory here is supported with logic .
And what makes you say that?
You must be speaking about your own work :D
Because my work is superb .
Covers just about everything ….. ::)
Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:25:24
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76600.0It's obvious.No theory here is supported with logic .
And what makes you say that?
You must be speaking about your own work :D
Because my work is superb .
Covers just about everything ….. ::)
Post by: Kryptid on 31/03/2019 15:30:44
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:33:06
Post by: guest39538 on 31/03/2019 15:35:23
And this is why I say the site needs a mechanism to clamp down on cranks.You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory section Mr Chemist , you of all people should know the differences in the word new and the word existing theory .
Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:44:07
In all seriousness, I have no idea what your thread about infinity has to do with anyone else's theories.It's just my opinion and not on a personal way.It's all about what we write here what we discuss .I'm not against the forum rules.
Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 31/03/2019 15:46:43
In all seriousness, I have no idea what your thread about infinity has to do with anyone else's theories.The discussion is great but the theories are invalid.
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:48:15
You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory sectionI will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:48:55
The discussion is great but the theories are invalid.You keep saying that, but not providing evidence.
Post by: guest39538 on 31/03/2019 15:51:31
You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory sectionI will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0
Quite obviously it was meant to be a sarcastic theory in regards to the way my real theories are discussed and the seriousness they are discussed .
See poll .
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 15:55:22
Given your history it is far from obvious that it was ironic.You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory sectionI will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0
Quite obviously it was meant to be a sarcastic theory in regards to the way my real theories are discussed and the seriousness they are discussed .
See poll .
How about "I propose that presently 1 second is equal to a distance, a value of 1 second is equal to 0.2875 miles per second of the Earth's rotation."
Was that a joke?
Or "Yes here we go again, and yes I am saying to all of you who are presently witnessing day time and light, that it is actually absolute darkness."
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=59228.msg463267#msg463267
Was that meant to be funny?
Post by: guest39538 on 31/03/2019 15:59:42
I don't know about ironic , I do know that science doesn't want to discuss advancing science . If only you listened a bit more and actually discussed , we might actually get somewhere .Given your history it is far from obvious that it was ironic.You can't be a crank for posting a new theory in a new theory sectionI will let others judge that.
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76599.0
Quite obviously it was meant to be a sarcastic theory in regards to the way my real theories are discussed and the seriousness they are discussed .
See poll .
My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .
Post by: Yahya A.Sharif on 31/03/2019 16:02:16
My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .It's strange that you call me Mr C and I'm the only one who puts his name.Just kidding
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 16:04:25
I really don't think he meant you.My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .It's strange that you call me Mr C and I'm the only one who puts his name.Just kidding
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 16:04:57
My equation works for almost everything Mr C ,No, it doesn't.
Post by: guest39538 on 31/03/2019 16:06:28
You'd be Mr Y ..My equation works for almost everything Mr C , it's great , I love maths now .It's strange that you call me Mr C and I'm the only one who puts his name.Just kidding
Post by: guest39538 on 31/03/2019 16:07:27
Yes it does . Go over to 5d thread . I show youMy equation works for almost everything Mr C ,No, it doesn't.
Post by: Bored chemist on 31/03/2019 16:23:30
That's one of many threads where you refused to address problems with what you said.Yes it does . Go over to 5d thread . I show youMy equation works for almost everything Mr C ,No, it doesn't.
It does not make sense.
So sending people there to try to understand something is pointless.