0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In the United States today, we have tens of thousands of priests, rabbis, mullahs, pastors, and preachers who are paid professionals, who claim to be active and functioning mediators between people and omnipotent invisible masters of the universe. They make specific claims about their god's nature, what he's made of and what he isn't, how he thinks and acts, what you should do to propitiate it…they somehow seem to have amazingly detailed information about this being. Yet, when a scientist approaches with a critical eye, suddenly it is a creature that not only has never been observed, but cannot observed, and its actions invisible, impalpible, and immaterial.
You're not making much sense. You haven't read the blog entry properly either.
Pharyngula readers are influenced by bad spirits?
To say that the universe and it's contents is evidence for god is not valid, because there is no way to distinguish this from the alternative, that the universe arose and developed by natural processes. There is no way to test that god hypothesis and reach the conclusion that god is real, because all the evidence can be explained by reasonable natural answers.
that the universe arose and developed by natural processes
I can't imagine what it must be like to be in your head. I can't follow your logic.
The fact that you need to ask for examples means that you are ignorant of how science works and/or have not read the bible. Just open up to almost any page where the topic is God and you'll see the contradictions between God and reality.
There can be no evidence, mathematical or otherwise, fore or against the existence of any Gods.
You think there is a god, I do not. You cannot prove it to me, and I cannot disprove it to you.I think the burden of proof is on you to prove your fairy exists, you feel it's my responsibility to prove it doesn't.Where is this going to get us?