The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antimatter?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antimatter?

  • 9 Replies
  • 7068 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David Mannino

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antimatter?
« on: 05/12/2010 13:30:03 »
David Mannino  asked the Naked Scientists:
   
Hello Chris,

I hit the backlog of newbielink:http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/podcasts/ask-tns [nonactive] off iTunes and loved it, although I never did find out why baboons bums are red...

Anyway, the answer to question I have answer can only be speculative but here goes:

1: The universe is composed of primarily matter and not antimatter.
2: Antimatter and matter from our perspective, doesn't like each other.

Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antimatter? If so, could that be a good reason why the universe is expanding (i.e. dark energy)?

What do you think?
« Last Edit: 05/12/2010 13:30:03 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline graham.d

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2207
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #1 on: 05/12/2010 14:10:58 »
    I don't think anyone knows. The matter-antimatter imbalance is really a mystery and the known evidence seems to suggest that there was a huge annihilation of matter and antimatter but there was an asymmetry which meant that, after this, there was mainly matter left. More recent theories may allow for the possibility that, for example, we exist on a 4 dimensional brane of a 5 (or more) dimensional universe. You could consider this as a bubble, which is some ways more descriptive, and that other branes may have other manifestations of the underlying structure that may be a different balance of the types of particles present. So it is possible you may be right.
    Logged
     

    Offline David Mannino

    • First timers
    • *
    • 4
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #2 on: 08/12/2010 10:52:13 »
    Unfortunately I am not that well informed about string theory in general but to clarify I meant more in a physical sense in our own dimensions. As if the Milky Way galaxy were made of matter while the Andromeda galaxy were made of anti-matter. I of course don't mean something that close in distance or even anything as small on this scale as two galaxies. I meant more of something like the Milky Way, Andromeda, Sagittarius Dwarf Elliptical galaxy, and Canis Major Dwarf galaxy - to pick 4 at random (on the internet, it always takes five minutes of googling to take 4 names at random) - which would be made of matter and maybe the upper leftish sort of area in the 'Cosmic Zoom Lens' to be made of antimatter.

    These are all arbitrary picks mind you but the concept still holds if you assume that the Big Bang threw out both matter and antimatter at random as a bias for one doesn't make much sense to me (then again neither does it for everyone in this field - which is more/less the point).

    This behavior would only make sense to me at this point if...

    A
    1. Matter and antimatter were thrown off pretty much at random, in all directions (although maybe not completely at random - see B)
    2. Matter and antimatter mixing created the energy for the expansion in the first place (I have no idea how this works, just bear with me here).
    3. Matter and antimatter which had happened to be in proximity with each other in the 'cloud' encouraged separation further.

    B: Contains A: but with a minor difference - particularly shape. Matter and antimatter were expelled with some sort of patterning, there are many ways this could happen in theory (to my mind anyways).
    - Related to A1. above: Matter and antimatter not at random but separated into two halves (I don't like this one but I include it for completion)
    - Related to A1. above: Separated out with a bias in two directions but not always that localised.
    - Related to A1. and A3. above: Spread out with a patterning like spokes on a bicycle, but in all directions. Not that much different but much a more pleasing visual.

    C: The universe doesn't actually exist and we are just kidding ourselves (this is the only one that almost seems to make sense after thinking about this too hard).
    « Last Edit: 08/12/2010 10:56:16 by David Mannino »
    Logged
     

    Offline yor_on

    • Naked Science Forum GOD!
    • *******
    • 44671
    • Activity:
      100%
    • Thanked: 99 times
    • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #3 on: 08/12/2010 13:39:18 »
    To make that idea work you would have to count in expansion and then define it as something like "Where the light won't ever reach us from, due to expansion."
    Then you also would need to explain why we don't see 'energy' cooking at the 'horizon' of our possible 'light space'. One might argue that we can't see 'far enough' though? The 'energy' I'm talking about being the positive 'rest product' of matter and anti-matter annihilating each other.

    I don't expect it to be so myself though.
    Logged
    "BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
     

    Offline peppercorn

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1466
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 2 times
      • View Profile
      • solar
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #4 on: 08/12/2010 13:59:21 »
    "Matter and antimatter were thrown off pretty much at random, in all directions (although maybe not completely at random"

    If truly at random there would be almost complete annihilation very quickly after the 'Bang'. The regions of remaining mater or a-m would be far too small to cause galaxies, etc.

    For this to work there would need to be some physical mechanism to island-off regions of matter from a-m.

    The more simple, structure forming explanation, that some (unproven so-far) break in symmetry caused a massive slew towards creation (or at survival) of what we now call 'matter'.
    Logged
    Quasi-critical-thinker
     



    Offline QuantumClue

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • 613
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #5 on: 09/12/2010 14:29:21 »
    Quote from: David Mannino  on 05/12/2010 13:30:03
    David Mannino  asked the Naked Scientists:
       
    Hello Chris,

    I hit the backlog of Ask the Naked Scientist off iTunes and loved it, although I never did find out why baboons bums are red...

    Anyway, the answer to question I have answer can only be speculative but here goes:

    1: The universe is composed of primarily matter and not antimatter.
    2: Antimatter and matter from our perspective, doesn't like each other.

    Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antimatter? If so, could that be a good reason why the universe is expanding (i.e. dark energy)?

    What do you think?


    Oh yes, completely. Scientists have even postulated the existence of entire anti-galaxies! Nice question.
    Logged
     

    Offline David Mannino

    • First timers
    • *
    • 4
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #6 on: 10/12/2010 06:28:09 »
    Anti-galaxy...interesting, I like the sound of that  [;D]
    Logged
     

    Offline peppercorn

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 1466
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 2 times
      • View Profile
      • solar
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #7 on: 10/12/2010 12:17:23 »
    Quote from: David Mannino  on 10/12/2010 06:28:09
    Anti-galaxy...interesting, I like the sound of that  [;D]

    I wouldn't pay it a visit though, if I were you.
    Logged
    Quasi-critical-thinker
     

    Offline CliffordK

    • Naked Science Forum King!
    • ******
    • 6595
    • Activity:
      0%
    • Thanked: 59 times
    • Site Moderator
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #8 on: 10/12/2010 13:44:04 »
    Quote from: peppercorn on 10/12/2010 12:17:23
    Quote from: David Mannino  on 10/12/2010 06:28:09
    Anti-galaxy...interesting, I like the sound of that  [;D]
    I wouldn't pay it a visit though, if I were you.

    In theory you could have unlimited power if you could harness it, and get some moved to a "normal matter" system.  The space traveler's dream!!!
    Logged
     



    Offline David Mannino

    • First timers
    • *
    • 4
    • Activity:
      0%
      • View Profile
  • Best Answer
  • Could our part of the universe be a bubble of matter while other parts are separate bubbles of antim
    « Reply #9 on: 10/12/2010 16:38:11 »
    Quote from: CliffordK on 10/12/2010 13:44:04
    Quote from: peppercorn on 10/12/2010 12:17:23
    Quote from: David Mannino  on 10/12/2010 06:28:09
    Anti-galaxy...interesting, I like the sound of that  [;D]
    I wouldn't pay it a visit though, if I were you.
    In theory you could have unlimited power if you could harness it, and get some moved to a "normal matter" system.  The space traveler's dream!!!
    Well, newbielink:http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics [nonactive].
    Logged
     



    • Print
    Pages: [1]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     

    Similar topics (5)

    How do we know the Universe is expanding, and expanding into nothing?

    Started by guest39538Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 43
    Views: 24352
    Last post 22/07/2020 05:10:15
    by CPT ArkAngel
    If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into?

    Started by Tornado220Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 14
    Views: 8506
    Last post 06/07/2017 10:35:51
    by paulggriffiths
    Where is the "edge" of the Universe?

    Started by paul.frBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 25
    Views: 24537
    Last post 01/04/2020 06:01:21
    by hamdani yusuf
    If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

    Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 14
    Views: 14819
    Last post 27/03/2020 21:05:55
    by yor_on
    How do we "know" that the universe is expanding?

    Started by PmbPhyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

    Replies: 12
    Views: 7378
    Last post 10/01/2019 10:20:39
    by Bored chemist
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.176 seconds with 55 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.