The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism

  • 8 Replies
  • 6223 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sorincosofret (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 204
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« on: 06/12/2008 07:50:57 »
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism

Maxwell formulated in 1864, a set of differential equations describing the space and time dependence of the electromagnetic field and these are considered as forming the basis of classical electrodynamics.
Maxwell's equations in differential form are:
 [ Invalid Attachment ]  Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction

 [ Invalid Attachment ]  Generalized Ampere's Law

 [ Invalid Attachment ]  There are no magnetic monopoles.

 [ Invalid Attachment ]  Gauss's Law of charge conservation

Besides these, there are the constitutive relations and  the equation of continuity.

Particularly important for present and further discussion are the first two equations:
  1. Faraday's law of induction describes how a time-varying magnetic field B gives rise to an electric field E.
  2.Generalized Ampere's Law indicates that a time-varying electric field will give rise to a magnetic field even in the absence of a free current, i.e J = 0.Consequently a  magnetic fields can be generated in two ways: by electrical current (this was the original "Ampère's law") and by changing electric fields. Maxwell observed that Ampere law did not give mathematically consistent results in circuits with capacitors so he introduced a new term known as ,,displacement current’’. The concept of ,,displacement current’’ represents the original work of Maxwell and this concept will be discussed detailed in the book or in the future posts.
   As far we are in a training period, we warm up with a simple concept – inductance and how this concept is integrated in actual electromagnetism laws.
   All modern texts admit that, Maxwell equations can be used to explain and predict all macroscopic electromagnetic phenomena.
   Therefore a very simple circuit is proposed and it is very interesting to observe what are the prediction of these ,,famous equations”. The circuit is formed from a long conductor with resistance R connected in series with a lamp of resistance R’. A source of DC current and a source of AC with possibility to modify the frequency are necessary.
In the first and simplest case using the DC source the circuit presented in fig. 1 is built.  The other necessary conductors present a negligible resistance

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Figure 1

If the Maxwell equations are applied in this particular case, the intensity of electric current in the circuit has the expression:

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Let’s modify a little bit the circuit, putting the resistance R in a loop form as in fig. 2

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

Figure 2
The components of the circuit are the same, only the geometrical form was modified and as result a new term appears in the current equation, which has the form:

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

where L has a specific value characteristic for the loop.

Let’s modify again the geometric form of the circuit and to form a coil as in fig. 3.
In this case the value of the term L modifies again to L’ and the current through circuit has the form:


 [ Invalid Attachment ]

 [ Invalid Attachment ]

    Both L and L' values (and the concept per se) are introduced based on experimental consideration without any possibility of prediction from actual electromagnetism.
    If the DC source is changed with an AC, the situation is even worse. With increasing of alternate current frequency, a simple conductor presents a measurable inductance (L). Carefully measurements can demonstrate that even in case of fig. 1 with a DC source, the resistance R has inductance comportment too, but is too small to be observed and used in common applications.
As can be seen in presented example, the intensity of a current in a circuit is ,,dependent” on a geometry of circuit. So, there is necessary to introduce in Maxwell equation a new term in order to relate the electric and magnetic characteristic with geometry. If we go a little bit further, it is possible to demonstrate that ,,electromagnetism” is a simple N dimensional space geometry with some tensors equations as is actual gravitation.
    Coming back to reality, a trustful theory of physic should implement the reaction of a circuit to a modification of a stationary regime as a basic principle.
   Actual electromagnetism is not able to introduce this concept as a specific law, because it will appear like a ,,internal force use”. More precisely, according to generalized Ampere law a variable electric field (E0) produce a magnetic effect (B0). In a ,,common   sense” interpretation, this ,,produced magnetic effect” (B0) can’t generate again a new electric field (E1). If actual electromagnetism admits the new electric field (E1) as real, this variable field should produce a new magnetic effect (B1), and this conversion will continue for an indefinite time. The real comportment of a coil contradicts these infinite cycles of electric-magnetic field conversion.
   In the book a new perspective of these phenomena will be provided. The energy stored in the magnetic field of the inductor will gain a new interpretation. It is absurd to suppose that inductors store the kinetic energy of moving electrons in the form of a magnetic field.

* image002.gif (0.25 kB, 89x44 - viewed 3298 times.)

* image004.gif (0.29 kB, 108x44 - viewed 3286 times.)

* image006.gif (0.16 kB, 64x23 - viewed 3376 times.)

* image008.gif (0.16 kB, 69x25 - viewed 3384 times.)

* image022.jpg (6.02 kB, 328x312 - viewed 1109 times.)

* image024.gif (0.19 kB, 104x17 - viewed 3306 times.)

* image026.jpg (10.4 kB, 441x371 - viewed 1087 times.)

* image028.gif (0.34 kB, 152x41 - viewed 1113 times.)

* image030.gif (0.34 kB, 149x41 - viewed 3209 times.)

* image032.jpg (11.41 kB, 385x377 - viewed 1095 times.)
Logged
 



lyner

  • Guest
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #1 on: 06/12/2008 10:31:44 »
Roll on publication date!
We will all be queuing up outside the shop when your book comes out.
I have this door which keeps banging. . . .
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27777
  • Activity:
    97%
  • Thanked: 933 times
    • View Profile
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #2 on: 06/12/2008 18:01:48 »
"As can be seen in presented example, the intensity of a current in a circuit is ,,dependent” on a geometry of circuit. So, there is necessary to introduce in Maxwell equation a new term in order to relate the electric and magnetic characteristic with geometry. "
No, there isn't.
There are lots of vetor tems in Maxwell's equations and, since vectors have a direction, there is already a geometric part to the equations.

Please learn some physics.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline sorincosofret (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 204
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #3 on: 06/12/2008 20:08:03 »
Of coure there are a lot of vectors, but there are only 3 directions in real space. In mathematical space there are n dimmensions.
Logged
 

lyner

  • Guest
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #4 on: 06/12/2008 20:36:06 »
Quote
   Coming back to reality, a trustful theory of physic should implement the reaction of a circuit to a modification of a stationary regime as a basic principle.
Doesn't it?
Logged
 



lyner

  • Guest
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #5 on: 06/12/2008 20:36:32 »
Sorin. Why do you write this stuff?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27777
  • Activity:
    97%
  • Thanked: 933 times
    • View Profile
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #6 on: 06/12/2008 22:18:12 »
Quote from: sorincosofret on 06/12/2008 20:08:03
Of coure there are a lot of vectors, but there are only 3 directions in real space. In mathematical space there are n dimmensions.

So what?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline sorincosofret (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 204
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #7 on: 07/12/2008 12:46:56 »
You will see what does a vector mean with next post related to a simple magnetic conductor experiment (a basic experiment in electromagnetism)
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 27777
  • Activity:
    97%
  • Thanked: 933 times
    • View Profile
Inductance and the missing law in actual electromagnetism
« Reply #8 on: 07/12/2008 13:55:13 »
Incomming!
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.08 seconds with 53 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.