[cpu68 (OP)]

How to increase your IQ level ? How to improve your IQ ?

The level of intelligence ranges from 70 to 200 IQ points, and very rarely exceeds 200 points (in the case of normal, not impaired intelligence). Below 70 points, Intellectual disability begins. Well, it turns out that the level of your intelligence can be raised by 20, 50, 100, 200 and even several hundred points. To do this, you need to tune in and set yourself up to raise the level of intelligence. The mind shifts to a higher level of intelligence with the right effort. In my method, the mind is moved to the target level of intelligence, e.g. 180 IQ points, or 400 points. Initial solutions of the described method were created in 2012. After a few years, it developed into a more complete version.
I initially increased my IQ by 20 points. Then 50, then 100, and finally I got to 400 IQ points. However, this is not the end, after quite a long time I came to the conclusion that I can raise the level of my intelligence up to 1600 points. For this I used a special method of magically reaching this level.



diagram. Distribution of IQ in population

As a means of supporting the exercise of intelligence, I use music from the radio through headphones, I analyze the musical structure as well as the text. In the case of text, you can test the meaning of a given text at the appropriate level, e.g. 180 points or 500 points, and after the analysis result you can find out that this is this the level of intelligence. Similarly, musical structure starts to sound much better as we raise our IQ level. Listening to music from the radio through headphones is not necessary to raise the level of intelligence, but it can be helpful.
However, the method described does not immediately give huge lasting results. Raising IQ to, say, 400 points is a short-term effect, it is obtained during the IQ-raising procedure and shortly after that, later the level of intelligence drops to a lower level, a permanent IQ increase of about 10 points is obtained. However, constant practice with the described method should bring results after some time. Perhaps after a long time you can permanently raise your IQ to say 400 or 1000 or even 1600 points, it depends on the development of the brain. For a more lasting result, the intelligence-enhancing procedure should be used continuously.
I estimated my IQ at 160 or 250 (230) points. Of course, thanks to the described method, I got an increase in IQ level. With one analysis, I got 160 points, with another analysis, I got 250 (230) points. This second analysis is related to the changes in the structure of the braincase that I have observed in myself, namely its enlargement. This is congenital trait. This is manifested by "falling" eyebrows on the outside. A similar feature can be observed in Einstein, only it is more pronounced in him than in me. Einstein's IQ is estimated to be around 165 points, due to his enlarged braincase he could though have scored as high as 300 (260) points.



photo. Albert Einstein in year 1921. On the photo it is shown "falling" eyebrows, a sign of an enlarged braincase.

However, it should be remembered that above I presented only some estimates of the IQ level. In fact, thanks to the enlarged braincase, a new effect is achieved that is qualitatively different from the usual processes of intelligence. A new quality is achieved.
One time I tested a certain problem at 180 points and using an enlarged braincase. The second result turned out to be clearly qualitatively better than the first. I estimated it at around 250 (230) points. For scaling intelligence that e.g. I have reached 400 points, I use an imaginary scale and scale. Einstein or me can be considered examples of a higher level of evolution, an intermediate link leading to a higher, new species of superman. On the spiritual plane (higher spiritual self) decisions can be made about the possibility of choosing such a direction of evolution. It is possible that the entire population will be dominated by this evolutionary model.
The process of intelligence development that can be achieved thanks to the described method can be related to the logistic model, which I used on a large scale in my other research (see New theory of evolution and Sociological theory). I will briefly sketch this model. Well, the graph of this model is a sigmoid curve, or more precisely, a logistic curve (generally a curve resembling the letter S). This model is associated with a rapid transition preceded by a stable period and ended with a stable period. This transition can also be described as a jump, from a lower level to a higher one. These changes are quantitative, but the period of dynamic transition is a cumulative quantitative value.
Well, my method provides tools to increase the level of intelligence, the stable period is the initial intelligence of a given person, the transition period is training in increasingly higher levels of intelligence, starting from, say, 180 points through 200, 300, 400, 500 to the final level, usually over 1000 points . The period of relatively rapid progression through intelligence levels can be treated as a jump phase, and reaching over 1,000 points as a new phase of stabilization at the highest level. It could be said that the goal of the development process understood in this way is to achieve an IQ value of over 1000 points. The final level will range from 1000, 1200 points to 1600, 1800, or 2000 or even more points depending on the initial intelligence level which may be 100, 120, 160, 180, 200 or more. The rule of thumb is that the final level should be ten times the starting level.

author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023

below description of a high and very high level of IQ up to 185 points, data comes from the IQ and Chess strength website - http://www.jlevitt.dircon.co.uk/iq.htm

IQ (Standard deviation = 15), Attributes

185    High natural neuro-kinesthetic control; high curiosity drive; anti trivia; in a hurry
180    New creation
175    Knows intelligent (and right!)
165    Formalisation; beginnings of self confidence; less hiding
160    Interest in logic; paranoia; minor creation; recognises good work; art; music
150    Trivial formalisation
145    Below this level and often above is everywhere found a slavery to conditioning

At the beginning, it is worth practicing on the levels described above.

about the author, My name is Gregory Podgorniak (brn. 01.1977, Szczecinek, West Pomerania, Poland). I am working on field of natural as well as social sciences. During philosophical studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (1996-1999) I was actively act in student scientific organisation, got a scientific scholarship, and one from my articles titled Circulus vitiosus and fourfold petitio principii in the system of Descartes was published in Humanistic Drafts of Publishing House of Humaniora Foundation in Poznan, no. 6, 1998. Unfortunately certain fate events made impossible to me continuing studies to master's and later doctor's degree. Thence I was forced to be content only with a title of bachelor.
Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Bodhidharma (5th or 6th century) buddhist patriarch, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.

email contact: podgorniakgre@gmail.com

my other threads on this forum:

Return of Hitler, World war lll, nuclear warfare - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=87090.0
New theory of evolution - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86174.0
New perspectives in physics - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=85367.0
New theory of social evolution and social structure - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86048.0
Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons; preon, preons - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0
Photo of subtle body, photo of soul, photo of astral body - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86291.0
Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86332.0

[Bored chemist]

The level of intelligence ranges from 100 to 200 IQ points

No , it does not.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.


Do you really not understand that about half of  people are below average?

[Bored chemist]

, I probably got an increase in IQ level to 500 points.

LOL.

[Origin]

author of text: Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023

It would appear that poor Gregory is not a genius, but instead is a nut case.   

[alancalverd]

The level of intelligence ranges from 100 to 200 IQ points,

Well that's a bad start, isn't it? 100 is the median, not the minimum. The gaussian 2-sigma points are about 30 (politicians) and 140 (people like us, excluding cpu68).

[cpu68 (OP)]

Do you really not understand that about half of  people are below average?

Well that's a bad start, isn't it? 100 is the median, not the minimum

Okay, my mistake, I was a bit too hasty. I corrected the first post. However, the rest was correct, as you can see for yourself.

[alancalverd]

So

1. how did you measure your IQ at 400?

2. what's knowledge got to do with it?

3. define good art, or good music.

[alancalverd]

Do you really not understand that about half of  people are below average?

Re

And now that more than 50% of UK teenagers proceed to a university education, the logical conclusion is that any graduate under the age of 30 is likely to be more stupid than average.

[Bored chemist]

I corrected the first post.

No, you did not.
You left stacks of errors.

[Zer0]

cpu...you are funny, in a good way.

You seem to have an ability to crack people up...in Giggles!

Good Job & Keep it Up.
lol

[cpu68 (OP)]

Good Job & Keep it Up.

Thank you for your post Zer0

[cpu68 (OP)]

1. how did you measure your IQ at 400?

a) For scaling intelligence that e.g. I have reached 400 points, I use an imaginary scale and scale.
b) For example, when I listen to the radio through headphones, there is a problem in a given text, I guess by the quality of its solution that it is, for example, 400 points.

2. what's knowledge got to do with it?

What knowledge do you mean ? please explain your question in more detail.

3. define good art, or good music.

for example, the painting of J. Vermeer, or the music of J.S. Bach

[Bored chemist]

I have reached 400 points, I use an imaginary scale and scale.

MY SCALE MUST BE BETTER THAN YOURS BECAUSE IT GOES UP TO 11.
:-)

[alancalverd]

from: alancalverd on 09/04/2023 11:45:25
3. define good art, or good music.

for example, the painting of J. Vermeer, or the music of J.S. Bach

So is a Picasso or a Brassau painting good?  Beethoven? Cage? Whale song?

[Kryptid]

I use an imaginary scale

That doesn't sound like a useful scale.

[alancalverd]

It's no less relevant than the pentatonic.

[Bored chemist]

It's no less relevant than the pentatonic.

The pentatonic scale is widely recognised, and useful.

But the OP is talking bollocks.

[cpu68 (OP)]

But the OP is talking bollocks.

You criticize all new threads as it goes, you should learn to distinguish between valuable ideas and worthless ones.

[Bored chemist]

you should learn to distinguish between
valuable ideas and worthless ones.

You should get a mirror.
Have you noticed that everyone is criticising your threads?

Redefining the IQ scale in a way that only applies to you and can only be assessed by you is worthless.
The merit of the real IQ scale is that (in principle) it is objective and scientific.
It's not great but it's much better than your "my IQ went up because I said it did" scale.

There are few ideas less valuable than that.

[cpu68 (OP)]

Have you noticed that everyone is criticising your threads?

Not everyone.

Redefining the IQ scale in a way that only applies to you and can only be assessed by you is worthless.

Anyone can create such a scale.