[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Hello all its been a moment, I promised I'd behave this time. Anyhoo here's an update on my aether theory.

The aether originates from a nucleus to the universe. It creates a stationary/static density/temperature as a background medium. Heat, in this stationary form or its standard transferring form, is the one thing that makes everything and all other characteristics branch from. If something didn't have temperature it wouldn't exist. We probably live a great distance from the nucleus and orbit around it.

An atom's nucleus is surrounded by the same temperature density on the aether as creates the aether of the universe. When two stationary gravity fields bring two objects together it is because the field gets stronger the closer to the nucleus. So when either field's outer edge which is cooler enters the denser/hotter regions of the other's gravity field, the outer edge is compressed and this action pulls the object's together based on size.

There is a shell around the nucleus composed of electricity. Electricity is conventional heat that has been stored deep in the gravity field of the nucleus and is also static or stationary. The magnetic field extends from the electric shell around the atom. Just like the energy its made from it is a stationary field that pushes in one direction. The edge of the magnetic field equals the density temperature of the surrounding aether. When you raise the temperature of the aether with light, the magnetic field retracts back into the shell and heats up the substance.  Atom's arrange from smallest to biggest in capability of increasing in temperature from the same aether temperature increase. The smallest atom hydrogen heats up the least because the amount of energy that's retracted into the shell from an increase in aether temperature is at its smallest. The area of the static magnetic field that is retracted increases as the atom increases in size, meaning less heat is required to heat up larger elements.

A good insulator slowly releases the retraction of its electric shell while a good conductor releases the retraction of its electric shell quickly. In a N type P type diode you have two conductors on one side and a conductor and an insulator on the other. This creates a one way flow for electricity. The insulator atoms in the P type material act like rocks in a river where current backs behind the resistor and then speeds up on the other side. So the push of the voltage through the P type material makes the AC current travel in one direction because of the build up of slow current on one side of the insulator, vs the other side where the current accelerates.

[Bored chemist]

Anyhoo here's an update on my aether theory

It's not a theory, is it?

[paul cotter]

It has been pointed out, ad nauseam, that since one cannot prove or disprove the existence of the "aether", It has no role in positive science.

[Zer0]

Hello Trevor & welcome back!

Could you propose an Experiment to test the validity of " Aether " ?

(a simple ' cando@hometest ' which doesn't require billions of dollars)

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Hello Trevor & welcome back!

Could you propose an Experiment to test the validity of " Aether " ?

(a simple ' cando@hometest ' which doesn't require billions of dollars)

I do actually! and its not total crackpot!

"I have an exciting new experiment to test for the aether being the medium for light waves. It is similar to the famous Michelson and Morley experiment.

The experiment utilizes a Femto camera. A Femto camera takes a trillion frames per second and is capable of capturing light in slow motion as it leaves its source. The link below is a video of just that. By pausing the video where light has expanded into s sphere, one can then measure for the aether 'moving past' just as they did in the M&M experiment. If the aether is in fact the medium for light one would expect to be able to measure for the slight difference in speed along different directions in a paused image of the Femto camera.

When I measured with a ruler on the screen I did in fact find that light was travelling faster by a few mm per 25 cm in one direction over the other and that earth is travelling around 3 to 4 million mph, faster then estimated."

[Bored chemist]

The experiment utilizes a Femto camera.

It's not an experiment; it's a cartoon.
That's why it's called a "VIRTUAL femto camera."
It is not real.


And You already know that because you were already told.
https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/128069-femto-camera-measures-for-aether-wind-and-finds-it/#comment-1220180

So, you are lying.
Stop.

[Kryptid]

The link below is a video of just that.

We've already been through this. It's not a real video of an actual event. It's a simulation made in a computer: https://benedikt-bitterli.me/femto.html

[alancalverd]

It's not a real video of an actual event. It's a simulation made in a computer:

Heretic!
Nobody is allowed to question computer simulations nowadays.
I recently complained to a local government "consultation" that their new million pound cycle path not only made the road and sidewalk dangerous, but wasn't actually used by cyclists. My complaint was dismissed  because their expensive consultants' computer model said it would be.

[Zer0]

I do actually! and its not total crackpot!

Honesty is a Virtue...Appreciated!

[Origin]

Anyhoo here's an update on my aether theory.

The aether theory is not forgotten, it has been discarded.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Well call it the aether or what have you, but what do you guys think of the idea of the temperature the aether retracting the magnetic field extending from the shell, back into the shell? It makes sense because the aether at a temperature of 4 and the shell a temperature of 10, that the heat of the aether wouldn't reach the depths of the shell? but retract the stationary magnetic field back into the shell, heating it up with light or what have you.

[Kryptid]

Well call it the aether or what have you, but what do you guys think of the idea of the temperature the aether retracting the magnetic field extending from the shell, back into the shell?

I think most of us would say that the aether probably doesn't exist and that its existence isn't needed to explain what we see in physics.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

Well call it the aether or what have you, but what do you guys think of the idea of the temperature the aether retracting the magnetic field extending from the shell, back into the shell?

I think most of us would say that the aether probably doesn't exist and that its existence isn't needed to explain what we see in physics.

But a substance can have no color, no taste, not make a sound, but it has to have a temperature?How does something with no temperature exist? The structure of the nucleus and its innate heat that gives it a constant temperature determines qualities the substance has?

[Kryptid]

But a substance can have no color, no taste, not make a sound, but it has to have a temperature?How does something with no temperature exist?

What substance are you talking about? My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.

The structure of the nucleus and its innate heat that gives it a constant temperature determines qualities the substance has?

Not really. The electronic structure of the atom determines most of that.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.

why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?

[Bored chemist]

My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.

why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?

You don't have a theory; you have a guess.
And it's wrong.

[The Spoon]

My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.

why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?

It was you who insisting there was an aether. Are you incapable of remembering what you have written or just trolling?

[Kryptid]

My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.

why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?

Because you said that it involved the aether.

[trevorjohnson32 (OP)]

My stance is that the aether doesn't exist at all.

why does an aether have to exist for my temperature theory to be true?

Because you said that it involved the aether.

No pope. I just call it the aether because you people are so high strung on semantics. call it what you want, you still aren't going to find anything in the universe without tempetature?

[Origin]

I just call it the aether because you people are so high strung on semantics.

OK then what is this 'it' that you call aether?  It is not semantics.  You are so unclear that most the time it is not clear that you are saying anything that makes sense