41
New Theories / Re: Does this answer evolution-deniers?
« on: 21/02/2022 12:14:16 »
Water was and is still critical to evolution. This can be inferred by the observation that enzymes, DNA and RNA will not work properly without water nor will they work if water is substituted by any other solvent. Life evolved, from scratch, in water; abiogenesis, even before the bias of replicators. Water was the original and continuing source of natural selection at the molecular scale.
Life in other solvents, such as alcohol, would never have selected DNA, since this molecule does not function properly within the nanoscale potentials set by alcohols. Even if you assume it appears randomly it cannot be selected since this would bottleneck further evolution; dead in the solvent. Much of the erroneous random approximation in current models is due to not including water based potentials when looking at life. This big hole within thinking, is approximated with organic cards and card tricks.
Entropy is a state variable, meaning any given state of matter will define a constant amount entropy. We model states using random based models like wave functions. The question becomes how can a wide range of random events, such as wave functions for a large number of interacting atoms, add up to a constant amount of entropy? It would being like saying we have 6.022 X1023 dice and will throw all these dice at the same time, a thousand cycle. What we finds is each time we do this, they will add to the same total amount of constant entropy. This defies all known properties of statistics, but this is observed. The deniers need to wake up.
One way to model this state phenomena, would be to treat the state like it is a closed container, so the free energy in the state always remains constant. This places a limit on the sum of all random events, since we lack any extra energy for things not to always add up. The smaller atomic parts can each fluctuate in value, even in a random way, but only as as long as somewhere else there is an opposite fluctuation to help balance this out. Mutations are part of this balancing act within the closed container approximation.
I am not denying evolution. I am denying the validity of the current models for evolution. These have conceptual flaws and I cannot just close my mind, memorize and repeat. I am not a good science bureaucrat, but tend to get bogged down by company politics. I like to use the power of reason and often find flaws at the conceptual level, even if this is not good politics. I can not accept the current half baked science. Any gambling addict can convince themselves that playing the odds is a way to success since people win jackpots all the time. This type of reasoning should not be called science, but an odd form of religion.
In terms of water, water forms hydrogen bonds, with hydrogen bonding unique in that has both polar and covalent bonding properties. In this respect, the hydrogen bonds of water can act like binary switches, with each of the two switch settings, defining different amounts of entropy, enthalpy and volume. Fluctuations in water's hydrogen bonding allows a way for larger states entropy to remain constant; glass of water. Water can show constant properties while still allowing dynamic internal fluctuations, like pH, which are often seen as random events. In this case these are ordered via a constraining ordering principle; constant entropic state. If we add organics; water and oil affect, which can alter the hydrogen bonding of water; surface tension, the water state parameters will lower entropy and will need to make adjustments to restore the constant; phase separation. This is highly ordered and not random.
Life in other solvents, such as alcohol, would never have selected DNA, since this molecule does not function properly within the nanoscale potentials set by alcohols. Even if you assume it appears randomly it cannot be selected since this would bottleneck further evolution; dead in the solvent. Much of the erroneous random approximation in current models is due to not including water based potentials when looking at life. This big hole within thinking, is approximated with organic cards and card tricks.
Entropy is a state variable, meaning any given state of matter will define a constant amount entropy. We model states using random based models like wave functions. The question becomes how can a wide range of random events, such as wave functions for a large number of interacting atoms, add up to a constant amount of entropy? It would being like saying we have 6.022 X1023 dice and will throw all these dice at the same time, a thousand cycle. What we finds is each time we do this, they will add to the same total amount of constant entropy. This defies all known properties of statistics, but this is observed. The deniers need to wake up.
One way to model this state phenomena, would be to treat the state like it is a closed container, so the free energy in the state always remains constant. This places a limit on the sum of all random events, since we lack any extra energy for things not to always add up. The smaller atomic parts can each fluctuate in value, even in a random way, but only as as long as somewhere else there is an opposite fluctuation to help balance this out. Mutations are part of this balancing act within the closed container approximation.
I am not denying evolution. I am denying the validity of the current models for evolution. These have conceptual flaws and I cannot just close my mind, memorize and repeat. I am not a good science bureaucrat, but tend to get bogged down by company politics. I like to use the power of reason and often find flaws at the conceptual level, even if this is not good politics. I can not accept the current half baked science. Any gambling addict can convince themselves that playing the odds is a way to success since people win jackpots all the time. This type of reasoning should not be called science, but an odd form of religion.
In terms of water, water forms hydrogen bonds, with hydrogen bonding unique in that has both polar and covalent bonding properties. In this respect, the hydrogen bonds of water can act like binary switches, with each of the two switch settings, defining different amounts of entropy, enthalpy and volume. Fluctuations in water's hydrogen bonding allows a way for larger states entropy to remain constant; glass of water. Water can show constant properties while still allowing dynamic internal fluctuations, like pH, which are often seen as random events. In this case these are ordered via a constraining ordering principle; constant entropic state. If we add organics; water and oil affect, which can alter the hydrogen bonding of water; surface tension, the water state parameters will lower entropy and will need to make adjustments to restore the constant; phase separation. This is highly ordered and not random.