0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The big bang theory is just what it is, a theory.
After all, with a bang that big which supposedly created the universe, nothing could have lived.
And calculating the earth's age as billions of years old is really kind of far fetched (sorry Math is not my strong suite).
With the big bang theory I'm sure evolution would follow and then mutation.
Albeit mutation is true, but evolution and mutation are two different things.
Now back to the big bang. There is no big bang, if there was, we would be on our way to a singular linear path to the outer of whatever is beyond space.
No explosion could produce something that would make a planet or moon, to revolve another body.If someone could simulate, lets say a an explosion, no matter how big or small and make a pebble revolve around a rock, and stay that way for even an hour. I would be a firm believer of the big bang.
For as far as I know, explosions or bangs throws thing away from the center of the explosion, instead of making them revolve around other things.
It may be easier not to think of it as an explosion.
I think the name "big bang" can be very confusing for this reason.
the voting system has been corrupted..