The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?

  • 5 Replies
  • 5930 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Joe L. Ogan (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 476
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?
« on: 22/11/2009 17:57:43 »
Does anyone really know whether space is finite or infinite?  Besides, in space, there may be another description for existence.  Just a thought.  Joe L. Ogan
« Last Edit: 22/11/2009 18:03:58 by Joe L. Ogan »
Logged
 



Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?
« Reply #1 on: 23/11/2009 00:24:46 »
We know space is expanding and now acclerating from some [finite] point in time. Now, at this general periodic galactic time (or asymptotic time) we can argue that spacetime is accelerating without recourse, and thus must imply it is infinite in size, because logically, the size of the universe now, was not the same as it is after. This is a process which has been proposed to have occured somewhere between 10,000-15 million years ago.

So space has a finite past, but predictably an infinite future, making it one large infinite streak in itelf.

Could you clarify this question please:
Besides, in space, there may be another description for existence.
Logged

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶
 

Offline Joe L. Ogan (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 476
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?
« Reply #2 on: 23/11/2009 00:34:56 »
Please let me clarify what I meant about space having a different definition than finite or infinite.  Since my limited human brain knows only these two definitions, I can only conjecture it might be something in between or something that could not even be conceived by my limited human brain.  I hope this helps.  Joe L. Ogan 
Logged
 

Offline Mr. Scientist

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1451
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • http://www.facebook.com/#/profile.php?ref=profile&
    • View Profile
    • Time Theory
Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?
« Reply #3 on: 23/11/2009 02:21:19 »
No, i am sorry - it doesn't.
Logged

''God could not have had much time on His hands when he formed the Planck Lengths.''

 ̿ ̿ ̿ ̿̿'\̵͇̿̿\=(●̪•)=/̵͇̿̿/'̿'̿̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿ ̿

٩๏̯͡๏۶
 

Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?
« Reply #4 on: 23/11/2009 07:46:12 »
It's an interesting question Joe, and the answer depends on how you look at it.

Space seems to be unbounded, which is to say that we're not aware of any intrinsic limits to it, so in this respect it appears to be infinite, or at least potentially so.  However, if you go along with the idea of the Big Bang, then the universe clearly appears to be finite in the time dimension, for it has a finite age.

The thing is though, that we cannot really separate space and time from each other and need to think of them as a unified space-time environment, which is expanding both in space and in time: the galaxies all seem to be receding from each other due to the spatial expansion of the universe, and at the same time we also seem to be constantly moving into the future i.e. into new time.

When thinking about space-time though, you need to be aware of the limitations of having a view point that is restricted to a particular number of dimensions, for there is infinite n-1 dimensional space within a finite n-dimensional environment e.g. there is enough space for an infinitely long 1-dimensional line within a finite 2-dimensional area.  This implies then, that there would seem to be scope for infinite 3-dimensional space-time within our 4-dimensional space-time environment, which is currently finite in the time dimension.  However, while the universe appears to currently be finite in the time dimension, the time dimension appears to be unbounded, just like space, which in turn rather suggests that our 4-dimensional space-time may exist within a higher order 5-dimensional space-time environment.
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 



Offline variationz

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 32
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
    • Fundamental Theory Of Existence.
Does not being able to prove that space is finite, necessarily, prove that it i?
« Reply #5 on: 26/11/2009 04:27:53 »

Space is finite in nature...

and here are the answers for your questions...

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=26911.0 [nofollow]

I hope you get them right!
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Can anything be "still" in space?

Started by SeanyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 31
Views: 16643
Last post 31/12/2017 16:56:38
by jeffreyH
Is "Space" distinct from "nothingness"? (and the Vacuum)

Started by geordiefBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 60
Views: 12352
Last post 26/08/2021 15:11:37
by Just thinking
We Know The Extent Of The Sun, What Is The Extent Of Space Time?

Started by TitanscapeBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 13446
Last post 27/04/2008 23:10:10
by turnipsock
If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 14807
Last post 27/03/2020 21:05:55
by yor_on
Is a stationary object in space really stationary?

Started by chintanBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 20
Views: 14318
Last post 19/03/2020 14:55:35
by Paul25
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.152 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.