Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: cpu68 on 27/05/2023 09:13:37
-
below a part of a bigger text New horizons in physics:
In the first generation of particles (see Galactical model of subquark particles - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0), space changes state and creates matter. These particles are actually made of space, only space in an altered state. Gravitons are made of space. This space in the case of gravitons is in an altered state (this also applies to particles at a level close to the level of gravitons that build matter). Gravitons are bulges of space. Due to the curvature of space, they acquire an attractive charge. These are the basics of Quantum Gravity.
Two theories which modern physics is based on is the general theory of relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics (QM). GR refers to great phenomena in cosmic scales, where gravity works. QM refers to phenomena in microscale, relates to particles and interactions. Years of research have shown that these two theories work well in experiments. On the other hand they are incompatible with each other. This inconsistency is revealed in very much small scale, Planck scale. To solve it, one should discover the theory showing a deeper reality, it will be the TOE, explaining all phenomena in the universe.
Among ancient theories, apart from atomism, we can find another one equally useful theory created by the Greek sophist Gorgias who lived in the 5th century BC, which turns out to be helpful in searching for the TOE. In the work On Non-Existence we can find the first thesis of this theory: nothing exists. Well, the ultimate basis of everything is Nothingness. The condensation theory of Nothingness assumes that everything is just a condensed form of Nothingness (and Darkness).
The TOE, it will be a concept where space creates matter. And more specifically the square microgrid of space, 10^-80 m in size creates matter by twisting (more precisely, it creates the smallest particles by twisting, and these combine into larger particles). This is similar to computer simulations from 1980's of XX century, where the simulation grids gave images of three-dimensional objects. This microgrid is like a mental simulation, and in a half it is. The basis for matter is square microgrid of space sizes in the order of 10^-80 m. So matter is made of space.
The concept of a square microgrid of space is probably compatible with the holographic concept, as this microgrid probably exists in two dimensions. Gravity would be the concave bending of this microgrid (see diagram), under the influence of its accumulation in the form of matter which it creates by twisting. Gravitons are formed directly from this microgrid, and through its concavity they acquire an attractive charge. Gravitons are bulges of the considered microgrid. Other particles from a level close to the level of gravitons hang from the considered microgrid as if on a string.
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Gravity_in_two_dimensions.png)
diagram. Represents gravity in two-dimensional space. The picture is closer to the truth than you might think. Gravity is actually the concavity of a two-dimensional square microgrid, of course this microgrid is much finer than shown in the image above.
The Theory of Everything I have presented is different from the theory of gravity itself and is more fundamental than the theory of gravity.
In my early twenties, I observed a square microgrid of space through quasiparanormal perception (observing animate matter at the lowest possible level). I encourage readers to observe this structure for themselves.
The symbol of matter is a ball (circle). Let's take planets, stars, atoms and particles. The square shape of the microgrid follows from the order of geometric forms, one of the basic geometric forms is the square. Reduction of all processes to basic geometric forms can be justified. Above the microgrid, i.e. space-time, or rather spacetimematter, there is a sphere of simple, ideal geometric forms (this concept resembles the Platonic doctrine, except that it does not contain abstract ideas). All phenomena can be reduced to geometry.
However, the TOE I presented is incomplete, the proper theory of everything should describe God and creation (the universe), i.e. it should be a theological-natural theory.
My main doubt regarding my own theory is whether the universe is flat (two-dimensional) or whether the existence of three-dimensional space should be allowed. Further analysis in this regard will take time.
Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, years 2019 and 2023 and 2024
about the author, My name is Gregory Podgorniak (brn. 01.1977, Szczecinek, West Pomerania, Poland). I am working on field of natural as well as social sciences. During philosophical studies at Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (1996-1999) I was actively act in student scientific organisation, got a scientific scholarship and one from my articles titled Circulus vitiosus and fourfold petitio principii in the system of Descartes was published in Humanistic Drafts of Publishing House of Humaniora Foundation in Poznan, no. 6, 1998. Unfortunately certain fate events made impossible to me continuing studies to master's and later doctor's degree. Thence I was forced to be content only with a title of bachelor.
Thanks to deep and penetrating researchings I was able to establish indisputably some number of my past incarnations reaching of ancient period, these data are certain, these incarnations are: Auguste Comte (1798-1857) French philosopher and sociologist, Edme Mariotte (1620-1684) French physicist and meteorologist, Bodhidharma (5th or 6th century) buddhist patriarch, Aenesidemus (1 st century BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Arcesilaus (315-241 BC) Greek sceptical philosopher, Gorgias (485-380 BC) Greek sophist.
email contact: podgorniakgre@gmail.com
my other threads on this forum:
New perspectives in physics - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=85367.0
New theory of social evolution and social structure - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86048.0
Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons; preon, preons - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0
How to raise your IQ, how to achieve higher IQ, how to get higher IQ ? - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86231.0
Photo of subtle body, photo of soul, photo of astral body - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86291.0
New theory of evolution - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86174.0
-
The basis for matter is square microgrid of space sizes in the order of 10^-80 m.
How did you arrive at that number?
-
Do you realise that this
Gravity would be the concave bending of this microgrid (see diagram), under the influence of its accumulation in the form of matter which it creates by twisting.
makes no sense at all?
Why would twisting a grid make matter?
-
In the previous version of a similar thread, I tried to use the concept of God, but eventually I returned to atheistic positions
No you didn't. You kept posting religious ramblings until the post was locked.
-
In the previous version of a similar thread, I tried to use the concept of God, but eventually I returned to atheistic positions
What you seem not to realise is that you just announced that you don't know what logic and evidence are, but you still expect us to pay attention to your ideas.
Why would we do that?
-
How did you arrive at that number?
In the three models galactical, cosmical and supercosmical the distances are of the order of 15 powers, so from the last value of 10^-65 I subtracted 15 and got 10^-80.
-
How did you arrive at that number?
In the three models galactical, cosmical and supercosmical the distances are of the order of 15 powers, so from the last value of 10^-65 I subtracted 15 and got 10^-80.
What models? Ones that you made up?
-
How did you arrive at that number?
In the three models galactical, cosmical and supercosmical the distances are of the order of 15 powers, so from the last value of 10^-65 I subtracted 15 and got 10^-80.
What you seem not to realise is that you just announced that you don't know what logic and evidence are, but you still expect us to pay attention to your ideas.
Why would we do that?
-
What about the convexity of a 2-d square microgrid...
Would that yield Anti-Gravity?
-
Don't go there, Zero, my friend. Any convexity in the grid would create a massive black hole consuming the entire universe and reducing it to a singularity effectively nullifying the last ~13 billion years. It would be as though we had never existed!!
-
makes no sense at all?
Why would twisting a grid make matter?
Because the microgrid creates the smallest particles by twisting.
What models? Ones that you made up?
For these models see here - Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons; preon, preons - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0
-
What about the convexity of a 2-d square microgrid...
Would that yield Anti-Gravity?
A brilliant remark, Zer0.
Yes, that would probably give antigravity.
-
In the three models galactical, cosmical and supercosmical the distances are of the order of 15 powers
How did you arrive at 15 orders of magnitude difference?
-
15 orders of magnitude?? Simple, from the second theorem of differential numerology.
-
How did you arrive at 15 orders of magnitude difference?
The sizes of quarks or electrons are about 10^-20 m, to the Planck length it is 15 orders of magnitude, and I assumed these sizes for particles from the galactical model.
-
The sizes of quarks or electrons are about 10^-20 m, to the Planck length it is 15 orders of magnitude, and I assumed these sizes for particles from the galactical model.
The galactic model that you made up? Also, where did you get the size in planck length of quarks and electrons? You do know that they are different particles with different sizes?
-
So the structure of the 2-d square microgrid Matters.
Concavity/Convexity might yield Gravity/Anti.
I Wonder what happens in places where the grid structure is uniformly Flat?
-
The considered microgrid is larger or smaller, but it is certainly very fine.
-
The considered microgrid is larger or smaller, but it is certainly very fine.
Did you read that before you posted it?
-
BC, I very much doubt he has proof read anything he has posted.
-
The considered microgrid is larger or smaller, but it is certainly very fine.
Hmmm...how Fine would you say?
Even nicer than W?dka eh?
(lol)
Anyways, can the Microgrid Stretch & Bend?
Or can it Rip & Tear?
-
can the Microgrid Stretch & Bend?
It can probably bend, it is not known if it can stretch.
-
can the Microgrid Stretch & Bend?
It can probably bend, it is not known if it can stretch.
Gravitational waves passing through space make it stretch and contract. That's how we detect them via LIGO and VIRGO.
-
Gravitational waves passing through space make it stretch and contract
Thank you for this insight, it's helpful.
-
In my philosophical concept, I assume that the microgrid of space which looks like a computer simulation is half a mental phenomenon and half a material (spatial) phenomenon. However, it may be that the mind has a smaller role in this phenomenon and occupies approximately one third of the phenomenon. But it may also be that the mind has a greater share in this phenomenon and takes up approximately two-thirds of the phenomenon. The way to avoid these fluctuations between one option and the other is to adopt a half-and-half split, as I did.
-
In my philosophical concept, I assume that the microgrid of space which looks like a computer simulation is half a mental phenomenon and half a material (spatial) phenomenon. However, it may be that the mind has a smaller role in this phenomenon and occupies approximately one third of the phenomenon. But it may also be that the mind has a greater share in this phenomenon and takes up approximately two-thirds of the phenomenon. The way to avoid these fluctuations between one option and the other is to adopt a half-and-half split, as I did.
Have you found actual evidence that the correct extent to which the mind is involved is not, in fact, zero?
Can you show it's not just some thing you made up?
-
Have you found actual evidence that the correct extent to which the mind is involved is not, in fact, zero?
Can you show it's not just some thing you made up?
There is a possibility that the participation of the mind is zero. However, the microgrid considered looks like a computer or mental simulation. The issue still requires research.
-
There is a possibility that the participation of the mind is zero. However, the microgrid considered looks like a computer or mental simulation.
Just in case you were wondering posting a meaningless series of words is not considered science.
-
However, the microgrid considered...
Remember; it's not real.
-
One might wonder whether gravitons are bulges of space or are embedded in it as independent particles. I chose the first option.
-
The symbol of matter is a ball (circle). Let's take planets, stars, atoms and particles
-
The symbol of matter is a ball (circle). Let's take planets, stars, atoms and particles
Since you have a TOE, how about you use it to calculate something, anything would fine.
-
The symbol of matter is a ball (circle). Let's take planets, stars, atoms and particles. The flat shape of the galaxy encodes the hidden nature of the cosmos, which is flat. Nothingness in the form of space simply takes a different form, also a microgrid. Although in some perspective the space is completely empty, i.e. it is nothing. The microgrid is a condensed form of nothingness. The square shape of the microgrid follows from the order of geometric forms, one of the basic geometric forms is the square. Reduction of all processes to basic geometric forms can be justified. Above the microgrid, i.e. space-time, or rather spacetimematter, there is a sphere of simple, ideal geometric forms (this concept resembles the Platonic doctrine, except that it does not contain abstract ideas). All phenomena can be reduced to geometry and ultimately to nothingness.
-
The current concepts in physics, such as string theory, are fundamentally false and are the result of exuberant speculation divorced from reality.
-
Some power may reside in nothingness and she (nothingness) may have certain zones.