The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Radio Show & Podcast Feedback
Driverless cars
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Driverless cars
7 Replies
3588 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
thedoc
(OP)
Forum Admin
Moderator
Hero Member
510
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 21 times
Driverless cars
«
on:
22/11/2016 16:49:16 »
Driverless cars could change the world- but what legal and ethical challenges do they bring with them?
Read a transcript of the interview by clicking here
or [chapter podcast=1001529 track=16.11.22/Naked_Scientists_Show_16.11.22_1005986.mp3]
Listen to it now[/chapter] or
[download as MP3]
«
Last Edit: 22/11/2016 16:49:16 by _system
»
Logged
RD
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Re: Driverless cars
«
Reply #1 on:
23/11/2016 02:51:13 »
What will the driver-AI decide when faced with the dilemma of saving the car-passengers, but at the expense of the people queuing at the bus-stop ? ...
http://gizmodo.com/your-self-driving-car-will-be-programmed-to-kill-you-de-1782499265
Logged
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
18452
Activity:
61.5%
Thanked: 1560 times
life is too short to drink instant coffee
Re: Driverless cars
«
Reply #2 on:
23/11/2016 12:04:07 »
In the event of any collision, who is legally liable?
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
jeffreyH
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
6996
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 192 times
The graviton sucks
Re: Driverless cars
«
Reply #3 on:
23/11/2016 21:06:43 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 23/11/2016 12:04:07
In the event of any collision, who is legally liable?
Skynet?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
nilak
Sr. Member
451
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 19 times
Re: Driverless cars
«
Reply #4 on:
23/11/2016 22:48:49 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 23/11/2016 12:04:07
In the event of any collision, who is legally liable?
In aviation there is a collision avoidance system called ACAS. If two aircraft are in a conficting paths and predicted to go below some pre-established values it will issue mandatory commands to pilots at a certain time befor the point of impact. Basically ACAS is "driving" the plane through traffic from that moment. There have been reported deficiencies in the past but the system but newer versions fixed those problems. Now, if the system generated wrong maneuvers due to design glitches and an accident would happen who is going to be responsible? I don't think, the designer will be liable. The authority that issued approval for the inmplementation and use of the equipment could be liable but only if they failed to follow their own protocols (deliberately or in negligence). Otherwise it could be subject to a judge decision.
However this system is a last line of defense (usually ATC provides separation). In the case of driverless cars it is a matter if choice.
My idea is, if the system is proved safer (even marginally) than an average human driver (acording statistical data) it can get approval for implementation and use, even if it is completely autonomous. Nobody will be legally liable in the event of a collision. However, This is really hard to accomplish and possibly harder ( might be impossible or perhaps by implementation in small steps) to demonstrate. An average driver can cause a serious accident once in like 10 years or perhaps even more ( I didn't check recent statistics). For example Tesla already anwers accusations using statistical data).
This is how I see the problem.
«
Last Edit: 23/11/2016 22:56:28 by Nilak
»
Logged
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
18452
Activity:
61.5%
Thanked: 1560 times
life is too short to drink instant coffee
Re: Driverless cars
«
Reply #5 on:
23/11/2016 23:26:55 »
AFAIK ACAS does not assume command. It, or a human controller, can issue deconfliction advice, and a human controller can issue deconfliction commands. In the event of a collision the pilot may be held liable for ignoring such advice, or the controller may be liable for issuing an incorrect instruction, but no machine is held liable. Faulty equipment may be considered mitigating.
The technical difference is that midair conflicts are very rare and in principle predictable because the rate of closure from initially nonintersecting paths is actually quite low (in English - planes have plenty of room to maneuver and can't turn or accelerate/decelerate rapidly) whereas dogs, children and drunks run out into roads and cyclists fall off bikes without warning. Therefore the assumption that something that works in the air (and only if all the other aircraft are carrying TCAS-compatible transponders and have them switched on) can be implemented on a city street, is preposterous.
If nobody is legally liable for a collision, who pays for the damage?
There are about 3000 road fatalities (mostly urban pedestrians and cyclists) a year in the UK, with about 45,000,000 drivers licensed. This suggests that the average driver will kill one person every 15,000 years. Multiply by 10 for serious injuries, and it's still a fairly low probability, so maybe there isn't such a great need for driverless cars after all. Driverless trains make sense because, for the most part, they operate in what aviators call a Known Traffic Environment (like Class A airspace) but city roads and country lanes don't fit into that category.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
nilak
Sr. Member
451
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 19 times
Re: Driverless cars
«
Reply #6 on:
24/11/2016 05:45:42 »
Although it is called advisory ACAS, advice must be promptly and precisely folowed but you are right, the pilot might have reasons not to follow the advice if the aircraft has serious technical problems for example. In that case it comes down to the judge to decide if the pilot action was appropriate or not. This is only an analogy for how we could be dealing with the legal issue.
I agree, technical challenges are far more difficult. An algorithm that coud do what a human driver does, would be far more complex than the most complex algorithm ever created by man. Even if you do it, the reliability is another big challenge.
Logged
nilak
Sr. Member
451
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 19 times
Re: Driverless cars
«
Reply #7 on:
04/12/2016 20:39:26 »
The new self learning AI software have really very promising results, so it might happen sooner than expected.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...