0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Why is it that I can probably guess what you are going to say? Ok, here is my take on it:For something to enter it has to move a distance so knowing that distance and the speed, in this case c, we can calculate the time taken. Question is “what is the distance”? Some might say the thickness of the eye covering, so we are talking about the corneal epithelium andthe precorneal tear film (PCTF).Before we find out how thick that layer is, can I guess that you are going to suggest a 0 thickness for the threshold hence instantaneous entry, suggesting light travels instantaneously? OK, I deserve that.
Could that be a possibility when considering entanglement?
Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 18:30:05Could that be a possibility when considering entanglement? No.
I did not mention light,
How much time does it take for an electromagnetic field to enter your eye?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 08/06/2018 18:50:07Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 18:30:05Could that be a possibility when considering entanglement? No.Why not?
Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 19:06:27Quote from: Bored chemist on 08/06/2018 18:50:07Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 18:30:05Could that be a possibility when considering entanglement? No.Why not?Because it is obviously nonsense.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 10/06/2018 09:34:58Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 19:06:27Quote from: Bored chemist on 08/06/2018 18:50:07Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 18:30:05Could that be a possibility when considering entanglement? No.Why not?Because it is obviously nonsense.Lol, what about x-rays, gamma rays etc?
Quote from: Thebox on 10/06/2018 12:27:47Quote from: Bored chemist on 10/06/2018 09:34:58Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 19:06:27Quote from: Bored chemist on 08/06/2018 18:50:07Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 18:30:05Could that be a possibility when considering entanglement? No.Why not?Because it is obviously nonsense.Lol, what about x-rays, gamma rays etc?It's still nonsense.
I understand the subject, so I can see that it is nonsense.You do not understand it, and so you do not realise that it is nonsense.There's nothing meaningful for me to concede.
You are saying your eye lids stop all lengths of electromagnet radiation passing into your brain functions space.
Quote from: Thebox on 10/06/2018 16:36:46 You are saying your eye lids stop all lengths of electromagnet radiation passing into your brain functions space. I didn't say that- you made it up.Please don't do that again- apart from anything else, it makes you look silly.
No.You said "Quote from: Thebox on 08/06/2018 18:30:05Could that be a possibility when considering entanglement? and I said it was nonsense.It's still nonsense if you talk about entangled gamma rays.Please try to keep up with what you are saying. You look really silly when you can't even agree with yourself.
How can ''energy'' ever be isolated?
Quote from: Thebox on 10/06/2018 16:57:54How can ''energy'' ever be isolated? Who said it was?
How is that not entangled?