The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of NobodySavedMe
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - NobodySavedMe

Pages: [1]
1
General Science / Tragic reaction to prescription drug
« on: 01/03/2009 20:36:54 »
Shaun Jones a healthy 14 year old was killed by a doctors prescription for acne 5 days ago.

The doctor has been held blameless by the doctors council.This is a classic case of doctors protecting their own.The medication came with no warnings that it could kill.

It is very strange this was not headline news.He was white,tall,popular and funloving.

 

Have you noticed when anyone dies nowadays they are always described as popular and fun loving.Why is that?


Another unfortunate reason maybe that he Welsh and the Welsh people suffer discrimination and inbred bigotry from the English.


The medication called sebomin is worth $230 million in annual profit.

This may explain why there was no mainstream media publication and was confined to page 9 in a small paragraph.Clearly warnings had gone out to keep it buried.

Shaun Jones was a healthy rugby player, he was popular and fun loving.

He had his whole life ahead of him.

Yet he killed by a single tablet prescribed by his doctor who never bothered to check for side effects.

One doctor I spoke to said this was nothing and that more then 200000 people are killed every year in America but the drugs are just too profitable and the media and politicians have been bribed by the deep pockets of the pharmaceutical companies.

He said they had been paid $20 billion last year.

You may have noted how the House of Lords peers were involved in a "money to change the law" scandal.

I feel very sorry for the family of Shaun Jones.To have a 14 year old son killed by a single doctors tablet...words fail me.


Mod edit - changed the subject, as it was a defamatory lie

2
General Science / Nanocurrents heal Eczema Allergy Sufferer in 1 hour !
« on: 25/02/2009 09:11:21 »
http://www.mefeedia.com/entry/gadgeteers-nanocurrents-invention-clears-health-food-store-owners-allergy-or-eczema-in-one-hour/14253336/

This man has used a simple £4.99 multimeter to heal an eczema sufferer using the currents from a multimeter used to measure resistance.He seemed to have used the resistance measuring setting which passes a very small current through the material of which the resistance is to be measured.

Andrew K Fletcher may be interested in this as he has been advocating Incldne Bed Therapy for psorisis against ingrained doubt.Perhaps this could be used or related to it.

3
Complementary Medicine / Saving Jade Goody - Urgent Humanitarian Appeal.
« on: 16/02/2009 22:18:34 »
Saving Jade Goody - Not Private Ryan.


As you have heard the world famous celebrity Jade Goody has been confirmed as having terminal cancer as was stated on the news.She is only 27 years old.

She was on Big Brother and many tv shows and was and is a very popular celebrity
adored by the masses.

I was devastated to hear she is dying.She has 2 children.She is only 27 years old.

Last night I cried and cried as I saw how she had been ravaged by cancer and chemo therapy which did not work, as usual.

I could not sleep all last night.

Her long beautiful hair is all gone and she is bald due to the terrible toxic poisons the doctors fed her with their fake promises.

I am very upset and I implore you, all you people who have knowledge of alternative cancer therapies to urgently contact her and save her please.

She can be contacted directly or through her agent Max Clifford.She must be advised
that there is hope and a possibility of living beyond the 27 years she has lived.

I urge you alternative cancer remedy experts to hurry as she has only a few months left to live.

This is a chance for you to shine and for you to save somebody famous who could then help you.

Last but not least please paray for her tonight in your parayers.

Please hurry.Time is of the essence.


4
General Science / Silver is to be classified as a Pesticide by the EPA !!!
« on: 16/02/2009 14:08:23 »
The EPA which is another corrupt organization closely allied to the corrupt FDA wants to classify Nano Silver a pesticide.

The Environmental Protection Agency is now selectively targeting nano silver - while ignoring pharmaceuticals and toxic chemical pesticides - as an environmental pollutant!

This is because nano silver has shown powerful anti bacterial and anti viral properties and its increasing us in health related fields is causing grave concern that its use may reach a critical point where it supercedes Big Pharma products.

No doubt this is the main reason they want to to classify it as a pesticide as you would not want your doctor to give you something called a pesticide would you?

If this this approved then it will be banned from health use and allowing Big Pharma to continue.

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2006/12/07/nano_silver_kills_microbes_epa_up_in_arms.htm

5
General Science / White Roads To Reduce Global Warmining
« on: 21/01/2009 22:41:10 »
The other night I saw a short stretch of road which was white and it was well illuminated from standard night lamps almost as if it was daylight due to reflection from the white surface.

Thus it occurs to me that making new roads white instead of asphalt black could save a huge amount in night illumination and thus reduce energy consumption and the dubious global warming we are being brain washed daily with.

Old roads could easily be painted or chalked over to make them white.

I note also that the underside passages of railway bridges are are also painted black by ignorant,railway idiots and illumination is thus very poor despite lights being on all the time.
Merely by painting it white would reduce this gloominess and save consumption.

Another physicist to whom I spoke also claimed that the increasing numbers of black population people could also contribute to global warming as black skin absorbes radiation more quickly and hence contribute to global warming.as more energy is more quickly absorbed then a white reflective surface.In other words the albedo of the planet is decreasing.

Before people start getting on their high horses and start calling me racist,this is merely physics,look it up..It is well known as black body radiation.

In essence the increasing amount of black roads being constructed and also an increasing black population would increase the amount of black body radiation being absorbed.

No doubt this could be easily be proved simply by holding up a piece of black card board and white cardboard to the sun.You will be shocked how quickly the black card board warms up.

Also you could touch a black car and a white car and you will see a huge temperature difference of at least 20 degrees.

Hence the solution to reduce energy consumption and global warming is to make roads white and make blacks wear white clothes.

6
General Science / Does wearing a bra increase your cancer risk?
« on: 20/01/2009 23:51:38 »
Recent research indicates that the garment incites cancer.

Even slight CONTINUOUS pressure impedes lymphatic circulation.Try wrapping a a elastic band around your little finger.It goes blue.

A Bra is a large garment and the CONTINUOUS pressure over the long term promotes cancer induction.

Studies show that this is a very real possibility. The reason is that regularly wearing a bra prevents lymph drainage and circulation, which can greatly increase the possibility of developing breast cancer.

The lymphatic and circulatory systems are responsible for both delivering vital nutrients and clearing out toxins. When the body does not have access to nutrients or when it is under the attack of toxins, cancer may develop.

A study published in the European Journal of Cancer studied factors for breast cancer such as breast size and handedness. They discovered that premenopausal women who do not wear bras are less than half as likely to get breast cancer that those who regularly wear a bra. A study conducted by researcher David Moth revealed that even the lightest bras place pressure on the lymphatic system.

Other research published in Chronobiology International in 2000 discovered that regular bra wearing decreases the production of melatonin, which is a potent natural antioxidant.


It may be interesting to note that a very small proportion of men do develop breast cancer, exactly the same amount as women who go braless.

Also zero mention in the mainstream media showing the endemic corruption of the press.

Mod edit - Formatted the subject as a question.  Please do this to help keep the forum tidy and easy to navigate - thanks.

7
General Science / What would cause mould to grow on an electrical socket?
« on: 12/01/2009 13:20:55 »
I have noticed a green mold growing on electricty mains sockets.

When an electrical appliance is  plugged in/out the green mold is visible on the pins.

The pins appear slightly wet.The mold seems to be deep within the sockets.

Question is it dangerous, contagious, could it cause a fire?

I have noticed some other unrelated to the mains wires/cables seem to show a green mold growth over time.There is no indication of dampness.

What causes it.

Can it infect humans?


8
General Science / Cheap Kindle Bookreader Project
« on: 09/12/2008 00:35:54 »
While I was in bed it occurred to me that a digital lcd phote frame used for displaying pictures costing about $20 for a 5 inch frame could be easily adapted to be a book reader like the Amazon Kindle book reader which costs a whopping $500.For that much you could buy a laptop or a desktop pc.

I see no reason why a picture LCD photoframe could not display text if it can display color pictures/jpegs.

Therefore I ask you to either spread the idea about this or make it happen.

Only a very simple basic program either linux or windows would be required to act as an operating system or even run it from a flash drive which would store both the pdf,rtf,txt,ebooks.

The idea is that a cheap disposable lcd picture photo frame could be used as a replacement for the very expensive kindle book reader.

This could finally revolutionise the reading of books due to low cost.



There are many clever,smart and intelligent people on this board who could easily implement this.

9
Physiology & Medicine / Can electricity be used to shrink tumours?
« on: 16/06/2008 11:33:22 »
Electricity Shrinks Tumors.In Vivo and In Vitro !!!

Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors




findings led to the initiation of a pilot clinical trial of the effects of TTFields in 10 patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Median time to disease progression in these patients was 26.1 weeks and median overall survival was 62.2 weeks. These time to disease progression and OS values are more than double the reported medians of historical control patients. No device-related serious adverse events were seen



http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/24/10152


This is very exciting for cancer victims.

The Establishment foot soldier will waddle along here shortly to promote chemo and to rubbish the above.


GEIPE has also similar success and it is even simpler for tumors.You can google it.

It is impossible to get funding/large scale trials/implementation as all the all the funding panels have big pharma stooges on huge cash incentives to promote chemotherapy and stop/kill all alternatives cancer treatments.

This explains why for the last 50 years no advances have occured from the cut,burn,poison methodology of chemotherapy.

Think about it.Every other field reports huge advances weekly,monthly,yearly.


Except cancer treatment.


Every new drug is just another random concoction of toxic chemicals at hugely inflated prices to make vast profits.

10
That CAN'T be true! / Popping Corn with Cellphones - Danger ! Danger !.
« on: 11/06/2008 23:52:45 »
We finally have the compelling evidence of how dangerous cellphones are as revealed in the below 3 different videos on youtube which show 4 cellphones popping corn right in front of your eyes.

That's right folks dangerous radiation is strong enough to pop corn.

This proves that cellphones cause tumours and cancer.

The videos are by the French race,Chinese race and Unknown race and come from 3 different continents.


Watch and Weep and remember what is happening to your brain every time you use a cellphone to tell your boyfriend how much you spewed after drinking too much.


http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=kAd0aWxs7kQ


http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=V94shlqPlSI&feature=related


http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=ju5yIFu4yY8&feature=related

Basically, you're hitting the popcorn with the same kind of waves that a microwave uses, which is actually really scary. Now, while a microwave oven is using way more power than a cellphone, also remember that the microwave is cooking (normally) a lot more than 3 or 4 kernels, and that the kernels are closer to the source of the power in the case of the cellphones than in the microwave, and wave power drops off sharply with distance.Now imagine a small microwave exposed oven next to your brain as you make a call.

I urge everyone to show these videos to your family and friends and spread the word about how dangerous these cell phones really are before these videos get suppressed by cell phone makers.I strongly urge you to save the videos to your hard drive and email/bluetooth them to your network friends as corporate companies will try to get them suppressed.

I mean if 4 phones can pop corn then just think of the damage 1 phone is doing to your brain from the microwave radiation.

11
General Science / Mercury fillings alert - FDA, ADA exposed in groundbreaking lawsuit
« on: 06/06/2008 23:40:17 »
Mercury fillings alert - FDA, ADA exposed in groundbreaking lawsuit


"The FDA has been successfully sued by Consumers for Dental Choice, forcing them to reclassify mercury amalgam fillings by June, 2009. This is the beginning of the end for the decades-long conspiracy between the ADA and FDA to protect the mercury fillings racket and implant neurotoxic chemicals into the mouths of children, teens and pregnant women".


read the full story here:-

www.naturalnews.com...

It is feared the FDA with their co-conspirators the ADA will try to stonewall or delay this.


And that's exactly what just happened. Consumers for Dental Choice teamed up with Moms Against Mercury (www.MomsAgainstMercury.org) to sue the FDA and its commissioner whose name sounds like an evil-minded villian right out of a Marvel comic book: Von Eschenbach. The lawsuit, entitled, Moms Against Mercury et al. v. Von Eschenbach, Commissioner, et al was concluded earlier this week with a reluctant agreement by the FDA to both change its website on the issue of mercury and to reclassify mercury within one year, following a period of public comment (which the agency will no doubt try to drag out as long as possible in order to avoid actually sticking to the terms of the lawsuit agreement).


I urge everyone to write to their congressman to get it implemented and the FDA disbanded or replaced as the officials appear to be corrupt and get rewarded via golden handshakes by those whose interests they protect.


We must not let these scumbags stonewall us any further.Remember all the people who have been injured,disabled and killed by these corrupt officials.

12
General Science / Can passing current through the polar icecaps stop them melting?
« on: 24/05/2008 12:12:39 »
Stopping Polar Ice Caps from Melting.

As everyone knows due to excess greenhouse gases the polar caps are melting.I suggest that about 120 electrodes be place in a circular area enclosing the majority of each ice cap and a current passed through the TOP LAYER of the ice.

Mild and SLOW electrolysis of the top layer of the ice will generate O2 and H2 gases which will rise and displace the carbon dioxide gas which is responsible for trapping the heat.

Carbon dioxide weighs 12+16+16=44 atomic mass units .

oxygen molecule weighs 16+16=32 amu

hydrogen molecule weighs 1+1=2 amu.

As these gases rise they will displace carbon dioxide gas and and thus stop the heat trapping effect of carbon dioxide.

The cost will be minimal.


We are NOT talking about massive electrolysis or massive current being passed through the top layer of the ice.The top layer means about 3 inches or less of the surface of the ice.

Having multiple electrodes means we can fine tune the current flow.We can pulse it at various frequencies to generate different effects.

You can learn all about the electromechanical effects of ice here:-

permanent.access.gpo.gov...

13
General Science / Do fat people cause more global warming and food shortage than thin people?
« on: 22/05/2008 10:38:44 »

i quote a short passage.

"Obese people are contributing to the world food crisis and climate change, experts say.

The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine calculated the obese consume 18% more calories than average.

They are also responsible for using more fuel, which has an environmental impact and drives up food prices as transport and agriculture both use oil.

The result is that the poor struggle to afford food and greenhouse gas emissions rise, the Lancet reported.

It comes as the World Health Organization predicts the obese population will double by 2015 to 700m".

Source:-   http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7404268.stm

This is a very disturbing fact.18% is a huge figure.

I mean nearly a fifth of the world's food being devoured by fat people.

Powerful Americans corporations are forcing this mega eating habit on every one,using a combination of powerful advertising and political leverage to allow their dangerous food outlets take over the world's food supply in every country including the Chinese who have reported rapidly rising obesity rates as Chinese people abandon rice for Big Macs.

I hear the UK is also reporting rapidly rising obesity rates almost comparable to this.

Furthermore the rapidly increasing rate of obesity will mean even more food being consumed by a minority of people.

I suggest that pairing a fat person with a starving person in the third world might solve both problems.

14
General Science / What is the Numbers Needed To Treat - NNT - value in statistics?
« on: 12/05/2008 12:03:31 »
Next time you see adverts for a drug remember this very important number called NNT.


Numbers Needed To Treat.


NNT


Upon first glance, the ad boasts that Lipitor reduces heart attacks by 36 percent. But there is an asterisk. And when you follow the asterisk, you find the following in much smaller type:

"That means in a large clinical study, 3% of patients taking a sugar pill or placebo had a heart attack compared to 2% of patients taking Lipitor."

What this means is that for every 100 people who took the drug over 3.3 years, three people on placebos, and two people on Lipitor, had heart attacks. That means that taking Lipitor resulted in just one fewer heart attack per 100 people.


There's one medical statistic doctors don't much talk about despite its importance. It's called number needed to treat, or NNT. It’s a measure developed in the past 20 years, and it’s one of the best-kept statistical secrets in medicine.

The idea of NNT is simple enough. Most clinical trials look at how much better people do on a particular medicine. NNT answers the question: How many people have to take a particular drug to avoid one incidence of a medical issue (such as a heart attack, or recurrence of cancer)? For example, if a drug had an NNT of 50 for heart attacks, then 50 people have to take the drug in order to prevent one heart attack.

That doesn’t sound like a lot, so pharmaceutical companies tend to keep the number quiet and focus on broader, U.S. population-based statistics. But that could be changed if you ask for the NNT up front the next time you're handed a prescription.

Read more info here about how you are being tricked and hoodwinked:-

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/05/08/medicine-s-dirty-little-secret.aspx?source=nl

<mod edit - changed the title to 'Numbers Needed to Treat' for clarity>

15
General Science / Massive Scientific Fraud By Guess Who?
« on: 26/04/2008 23:56:51 »
Roll up! Roll up!

Read all about it.

Your lovely Big Pharma has been alleged to have been caught lying,cheating,stealing and killing on a massive scale.

The huge American company Merck has been alleged to have been caught indulging in massive fraud by setting up fake made up journalists from it's own in house staff and passing it on as peer review by independent scientists.Using these fake reviews they deceived the FDA and congress.

In other words it is alleged they used their own staff as reviewers and also paid fees (bribes) to outsiders to pin their name to their research.

It is alleged the other 5 big companies are also doing this.

What this means the prescription drug you take was not actually confirmed as either effective or safe by EXTERNAL INDEPENDENT agents.

It was confirmed by Merck who made it and profited from it!


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/15/AR2008041502086.html


Merck Caught in Massive Scientific Fraud as In-House Authors were Disguised as Independent Scientists.


Drug giant Merck has been has been alleged to have been caught red-handed in a scheme to deceive the FDA and the public over the integrity of its scientific studies, say top medical authorities. According to reports that were published in the Journal of the American Medical Association and detailed in the Washington Post, Merck waged a "campaign of deception" to disguise its in-house study authors as independent scientists working for universities. This scheme made the studies appear independent and unbiased, allowing them to carry more apparent credibility to FDA officials, doctors and other scientists.

This alleged fraud was conducted to boost the apparent scientific credibility of the studies backing Vioxx, a drug that has caused well over 100,000 heart attacks and likely killed well over 50,000 Americans, according to Senate testimony by the FDA's own senior drug safety researcher Dr. David Graham. Vioxx earned Merck $2.3 billion in 2003 alone, and was one of the most lucrative drugs ever sold by any company. But since 2004, when some of the real dangers of the drug became known, a tremendous amount of evidence leading to fraud has surfaced.

It now appears quite clear that it is alleged Merck deliberately lied about the dangers of the drug, misrepresented the results of scientific studies, deceived the FDA to win drug approval, knowingly covered up evidence of the drug's dangers, and now it seems Merck even conducted a deliberate campaign of deceptive ghostwriting designed to attach independent-sounding names to in-house studies that were essentially pro-Vioxx promotional pieces disguised as scientific reports.

Americans need to file a complaint and get alleged Merck officials involved arrested and indicted for fraud,murder and manslaughter.

Americans would be far safer if Merck were shut down. In fact, the threat to Americans' health from Merck far outweighs any threat to national security by terrorists. Think about it: The current war in Iraq has killed 4,000 Americans. Just one drug from Merck has killed over 50,000 (and that's a conservative estimate). That's more than ten times the number of Americans killed in our current war!
[/i]

What's interesting about this latest revelation of alleged Merck fraud is that the documents revealing the depth of this fraud were only made public due to lawsuits filed by citizens who claim they were harmed by Merck's drugs.


Although the alleged uncovered documents prove beyond doubt the deception and fraud.The media that mosts profits from Merck has failed to mention it, thus mostly it is the print media has covered the deception.This is in great contrast to the massive anti-vitamin propaganda orchestrated last week in order to keep more people ill and increase profits for these drug companies.These people include you.

You can read more about it here:-
http://www.naturalnews.com/023052.html

16
General Science / Anti - Vitamin Media Propaganda Exposed And Refuted.
« on: 22/04/2008 11:02:27 »
You may have noticed the massive media propaganda initiated by the Copanhagan University study.This was on all day.This was very peculiar as the study was clearly designeed to push an agenda which was to eliminate vitamins or reduce or regulate them to such an extent that their beneficial effects were nullified.

A background check of Goran Bjelakovic, the head of this study and the results show him to either be on a crusade AGAINST vitamins or merely a useful reference in various health scare news topics about vitamins and minerals.He appears to be a tool for corporate interests who profit from illness.

This was never mentioned by the dumbhead "journalists" who never bothered to research it in any way.

Have you noticed how this corporate propaganda was on all the media during the day worldwide?

When examining the study, a number of key points exposed come to light. The study itself is a meta-analysis, which means that the results of several studies in related fields are combined using statistics to draw an overall conclusion. By their very nature, meta-analyses require a selection process to decide which studies to include in their review.

This meta-analysis only evaluated what are called randomised controlled trials, where patients are put in 2 monitored groups and given either a tablet or a dummy-pill. The study failed to include any of the vast body of long term observational studies that also exist, so the evidence base is very limited.

In addition, the researchers identified 748 studies that met their criteria but they excluded 681 of them, so their results are based on less than nine per cent of the available evidence. What’s more, they specifically excluded any trials in which no deaths were reported (405 articles). This raises the question, how one can properly evaluate whether a substance can prevent mortality when studies that demonstrate no harm are automatically excluded?

The authors also chose not to eliminate deaths due to other circumstances such as accidents, medical conditions and suicides. They chose instead to assume that all the deaths that occurred in any of the studies were attributable to the antioxidant supplements. This is particularly ironic since many of the studies involved groups of people with a variety of health issues, not just those who were healthy. In fact, if a true mortality risk were to have become apparent in any of the original studies, they would have been halted. Interestingly, none were.

In addition, the studies they did select covered a vast range of different nutrients, doses, populations, and durations. This makes it very difficult to effectively combine the evidence and draw proper conclusions. As the saying goes, it’s like comparing apples to oranges.

Some of the studies also included extremely high doses of supplements, far in excess of the Tolerable Upper Limit specified by the Institute of Medicine and many used synthetic forms of nutrients. This may have significantly skewed the overall results.

Overall, it would seem that the negative results found by this review occurred because ALL the positive studies using safe levels of supplements were excluded. Consequently, the basis for exclusion proves that this is a vested interest study designed to benefit the paymaster.

The authors appear to be using their study as a campaign for greater regulation of supplements, yet their study makes no references to any of the regulatory procedures already in place.Very odd.

I think they should be investigated for fraud.

Let's us follow the money trail...

Who funded the study?

Who are these people and how much did they get?

What big companies are they consultants for?

How much stock do they hold they hold in these companies.

What does a 16 % increased risk in dying means?

Why are they not researching hundreds of thousands of people killed by the side effects of prescription drugs?

Why are they NOT publicizing and researching hundreds of thousands of people killed by the side effects of prescription drugs?

Why was this story picked and who was pushing it?

Who was responsible?

To you jackass "journalists" and "editors" why don't you boneheads start doing doing your job instead of copy/pasting corporate propaganda?

They even type it out for you now and give you a free beer and sandwich as a bribe.

None of you bothered to dissect the study.

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.072 seconds with 58 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.