0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This is not Science, it is Pseudo Phylosophy.Science has no time for anthropomorphism.
Is your 'nature' just a part of the whole of existence or is the whole world just a part of nature?I 'she' is greater than everything then why should she need to be 'finding' anything? She made all the rules and could make them how she liked. If she is just a part of a larger whole then do you mean that we are all a huge experiment which she has set up just to see what happens. Just what do you really mean?
Nature already got there if pi is how you judge success..End of thread?
Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/06/2008 20:52:02Nature already got there if pi is how you judge success..End of thread?Even the earth is not a perfect circle though it's round. But itseems it rotates to be perfect.
Quote from: SFMA on 10/06/2008 01:20:21Quote from: Bored chemist on 09/06/2008 20:52:02Nature already got there if pi is how you judge success..End of thread?Even the earth is not a perfect circle though it's round. But itseems it rotates to be perfect.Are you implying it 'wants' to be perfect?
Oh, fine. There's nothing more to be said then.
There's no doubt that living things are alive. That's a definition. The Earth doesn't match that definition any more than a tableknife does. Presumably you have your own definition.
all the Biology books.
How do you define life then?It normally involves things like growth, reproduction, nutrition, sensitivity, excretion, movement and respiration.This is to distinguish living things (studied by Biology) from non-living things likes rocks, air etc, which are studied in Chemistry and Physics.Perhaps you could give me an alternative definition of 'living' which makes sense.
I ask againPerhaps you could give me an alternative definition of 'living' which makes sense.Is this a human or a computer program I'm talking to?