0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
No no no. Go through all your material, even if it takes some time, and create an "abstract" about your N-field and how that relates with gravity and negative energy. The question has been asked. Get back to this post when you can do that.
Of course. Don't rush. Key points, and how you're idea relates either from new first principles or as an extension of contemporary theory, or both.
If I can prove anything outside the square, I am not held responsible for shock therapy, ok?
Further to this, the idea of a particle that is dualistic with a dualistic field accommodating for positive and negative energy though would contradict an expanding universe, right?
what appears to be a "required" steady state universe?
There we go again with the numbers and mathematical symbols with no page reference. Get the paper done first, then reference the pages there. A forum is not a "paper" unless you own the forum and are having a little fun.
I've read some of your posts and they detail a way to surf the understanding of contemporary science of an expanding universe which... contradicts the entropic-enthalpic equilibrium though you're proposing, right?
You're suggesting the feature of energy and mass as entropy and enthalpy appears to be ever expanding in space though, right?You'll have a hard time proving the curvature of space as gravity, gravity being enthalpic, is expanding despite it being enthalpic.
"Space" it seems is an entity that obeys each step of entropy and enthalpy "outwards" with your thinking, right?
Maybe include "Point density ''outwards'' proportional to the inverse, time is at its greatest at that point" in the abstract also....in the context of an otherwise good abstract, right?