0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Anyone following that line of research?
The initial buzz about EM drive was central to it being enthalpic, and thus impossible. "The Impossible Propulsion Drive Is Heading to Space". popularmechanics.com. 2 September 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2017.Crew, Bec. "The 'Impossible' EM Drive Is About to Be Tested in Space". sciencealert.com. Retrieved 9 October 2017."NASA Team Claims 'Impossible' Space Engine Works—Get the Facts". nationalgeographic.com. 21 November 2016. Retrieved 9 October 2017.Seeker (19 November 2016). "How The 'Impossible Drive' Could Break Newton's Third Law". Retrieved 9 October 2017 – via YouTube.Ratner, Paul. "EM Drive, the Impossible Rocket Engine, May Be Closer to Reality". bigthink.com. Retrieved 9 October 2017.Poitras, Colin (December 7, 2016). "To Mars in 70 days: Expert discusses NASA's study of paradoxical EM propulsion drive". Phys.org. Retrieved 1 May 2018.Drake, Nadia; Greshko, Michael (21 November 2016). "NASA Team Claims 'Impossible' Space Engine Works—Get the Facts". Nationalgeographic.com: National Geographic. Retrieved 23 November 2016.https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/05/nasas-em-drive-is-a-magnetic-wtf-thruster/Who wants to try the so-called impossible?
EM drive is the worst thing to ask your tutor for funding, right?
Proof is no laughing matter.
Sorted like Opium is prescribed?
There's a theory about EM drive coming out regarding enthalpy....
I completely agree with what you're saying.....but the hardest thing for me to do is present a new paper that does a "fair" job on EM-thruster research.
I've done harder things....like convince myself there's a point to going outside the square....right?Thats so stupid......help me allow people to tell me I am wrong....and that way I'm not so alone....?
Its done.....badly, goodly, whatever....I can only make it worse by being more precise.