Do you realise that the scientific description makes sense, and yours doesn't?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
when two atoms collide they bounce off each otherQuite often, they react.
Let's make it clear.One of the moons of Mars is doing.
Orbital objects do not fall in.
Gravity assist doesn't explain the accretion disc.Nobody said it did.
the gravity force makes a unique movement.
Instead of just dump that ultra energetic matter into the SMBH, it suddenly push it outwards as the observable UFO.
I'm aware of the idea.If you have a point, it might be a good idea to state it sooner, rather than later.
I tried to apply Socratic method here.QuoteExplore the technique known as the Socratic Method, which uses questions to examine a person’s values, principles, and beliefs.The video is related to morality especially at 1:30.
Socrates, one of the founding fathers of Western philosophical thought, was on trial. Many believed he was an enemy of the state, accusing the philosopher of corrupting the youth and refusing to recognize their gods. But Socrates wasn’t feared for claiming to have all the answers, but rather, for asking too many questions. Erick Wilberding digs into the technique known as the Socratic Method.
Lesson by Erick Wilberding, directed by Draško Ivezić.
I didn't hear about any law of physicsIt shows.
Or negotiating from strength.LOL
Nothing wrong with the policyEven the elephant knew it was a bad policy. He just saw it as a way to get power.
Australia where the rabbit may be a long way from any cover so the bird can catch it in a lowlevel chase, but British rabbits tend to feed close to homeThe rabbits in Australia are British rabbits.
If you believe humans evolved from apesHumans ARE apes.
Genesis in the bibleNot something you should even try to bring to a scientific discussion.
I will explain the science behind this next time.I'm betting against that.
It has to do with how neural memory is designed for a spontaneous increase in entropy;Not really.
Bored Chemist asked why Trump had to pardon someone if there was no crime. Law is made by those in charge and if criminals are in charge they can make law to punish the innocent.
Pardon can neutralize this.That's absurd; anyone in a position to pardon someone should change the law so that it does not
punish the innocent.
Say one made a law where good is called evil and evil is called good.That's what Trump called "alternative facts" and what anyone with any sense calls "lying".
Consciously they are dong good in their own mind; collusion delusion,So, for example, they might kneel on black people's necks or storm the Capitol...?
The Democrats see Socialism as their long term goal, where criminals can make laws and steal in the open, since it is deemed legal for them.I don't think I can point out the idiocy of that idea better tan you do in the next line.
due to internal simulations from the Satan subroutine.
God's law is...Regularly improved upon by society.
This was a first draft off the top of my head, this morning, and I didn't have time to edit.Editing probably wouldn't help.
That could be a very short thread.Quote from: alancalverd on Today at 18:30:50I think I will start a new topic/ post on just what the smallest object the human eye can see and this will depend on the object the light and the background contrast and whether or not the object is moving.
Little point in a raptor flying high because the prey will have run away by the time he has descended!
This is why we use the phrase "eagle eyed" for people who are shortsighted... or not.
Let's do some unit analysis.That is not a valid analysis (for a number of reasons).
The time unit as numerator there, indicates that the value is an accumulated quantity over time, which is second. It's similar to mAh in battery capacity, or kWh in energy consumption.
If the frequency is 1 THz, there are 1 trillion cycles in a second. So the energy transfer accumulated in 1 second is 6.62607004 x 10-22 Joule.No
Little point in a raptor flying high because the prey will have run away by the time he has descended!This is why we use the phrase "eagle eyed" for people who are shortsighted... or not.
If I understand you correctly,You don't understand anything.
that added energy is due to gravity force.The energy was stored there by the BB.
As the matter gets very close to the event horizon, the gravity force makes a unique movement.No
NEVER and EVER.We actually use this effect.
We send a spacecraft falling towards the Sun in order to launch it into interstellar space/.
It's called "gravity assist"
And it doesn't matter if you use capital letters, it is still observed to be true.
Exactly the same orbital mechanics could launch a small fraction of the incoming material away from a BH.
So, you fully confirm that the gravity force is for free.No.
However, you claim that the gravity force can't be converted into energy.
How can you use double standard when it comes to the conservation law?
When you need an extra energy free of charge - then the gravity force is there to contribute unlimited energy for free.
When you don't need it - then the same gravity force can't do so.
Is it real?
If you get bored, you can calculate how "little" they are.Bits of the oceans are "boiling" hot- over 100 C* heated by geothermal energy which isn't going to run out quickly.OK. The oceans will freeze except for little pockets of water near thermal vents.
You use the word - Usually.Well, let's go with the word "Always" .
I prefer to use - sometimes.
Hence, as the tidal heat comes due to gravity force, it is a free energy.In that case, the energy isn't "free" it comes from whatever created the Moon.
This is fundamental, high-school physics you do not understand.