[Origin]

I am reminded of Father George Lemaitre arguing for an expanding universe in a static universe mind frame.

I'm reminded of the people who post pseudoscientific WAGs that they can't backup with supporting evidence.

[The Spoon]

The expanding earth WAG is completely unevidenced and silly.

I am reminded of Father George Lemaitre arguing for an expanding universe in a static universe mind frame.

And with your posts I am reminded of Father Abraham and the Smurfs - they have as much scientific vailidity as what you laughably refer to as a 'theory'.

[Yaniv (OP)]

He had evidence.
You do not.

Do you understand the difference?

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.0

[The Spoon]

He had evidence.
You do not.

Do you understand the difference?

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.0

So you reference one of your own threads where you showed a complete lack of understanding of science, posted nonsense and spammed?

[Bored chemist]

He had evidence.
You do not.

Do you understand the difference?

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.0

Wouldn't it have been easier for you to just say "no"?

[Bored chemist]

https://onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15652

That page just shows that you are consistent, not that you are right.

[The Spoon]

https://onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15652

That page just shows that you are consistent, not that you are right.

I note he has removed the post....

[Yaniv (OP)]

https://onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15652
That page just shows that you are consistent, not that you are right.
I note he has removed the post....

I did not remove my post. Who removed my post ?

[The Spoon]

https://onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15652
That page just shows that you are consistent, not that you are right.
I note he has removed the post....

I did not remove my post. Who removed my post ?

Probably somebody who realised it was pointless obfuscation.

[Yaniv (OP)]

https://onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15652
That page just shows that you are consistent, not that you are right.
I note he has removed the post....

I did not remove my post. Who removed my post ?

Probably somebody who realised it was pointless obfuscation.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseudoscience/experiment-to-test-w-mg-t55108.html

[Bored chemist]

https://onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15652
That page just shows that you are consistent, not that you are right.
I note he has removed the post....

I did not remove my post. Who removed my post ?

Probably somebody who realised it was pointless obfuscation.

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseudoscience/experiment-to-test-w-mg-t55108.html

I think the rules have something to say about posting here to drive traffic to other sites.
If you think you made a valid point at some other forum, just make the same point here.
We don't need to look through dozens of people telling you why you are wrong.
We already know that.

[Yaniv (OP)]

I predict frequency and intensity of earthquakes should increase and volcanic activity should decrease in the future.

[Bored chemist]

I predict frequency and intensity of earthquakes to increase and volcanic activity to decrease in the future.

Over what timescale, and to what extent?

[The Spoon]

I predict frequency and intensity of earthquakes to increase and volcanic activity to decrease in the future.

Based on what? Where is your evidence? What mechanism?
Just throwing nonsense out there does not make it true.

[Yaniv (OP)]

I predict frequency and intensity of earthquakes to increase and volcanic activity to decrease in the future.

Based on what? Where is your evidence? What mechanism?
Just throwing nonsense out there does not make it true.

In my theory the exponential expansion of the earth stretches and cracks the crust to produce earthquakes. Volcanic activity should drop as the earth cools.

[Kryptid]

I'm still waiting for you to address what I've said about the gravitational constant.

[Bored chemist]

In my theory

Stop saying you have a theory.

[Yaniv (OP)]

I'm still waiting for you to address what I've said about the gravitational constant.

W reduction at increasing T in vacuum disproves F=ma and all derived physical equations and constants. #ResultsRequired

[Bored chemist]

W reduction at increasing T in vacuum disproves F=ma

Only if it happened.
And it doesn't.
We know this because we can observe that f=ma.
Do you understand what a scientific theory is?
Please explain what you think "scientific theory" means and why you think your impossible ideas somehow count as theories.

ResultsRequired

So why have you not provided any results?

[The Spoon]

I predict frequency and intensity of earthquakes to increase and volcanic activity to decrease in the future.

Based on what? Where is your evidence? What mechanism?
Just throwing nonsense out there does not make it true.

In my theory the exponential expansion of the earth stretches and cracks the crust to produce earthquakes. Volcanic activity should drop as the earth cools.

You do not have a theory. What you have is a number of unevidenced assertions that you appear to have made up out of thin air. In popular parlance  these are known as brain farms.