0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: The Spoon on 28/01/2023 12:00:22Glaser paper is below.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172cI looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'The author forgot to include the 'control' experiment in his paper, weighing the metals in vacuum, to conclude air convection is responsible for changes in weight.
Glaser paper is below.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172cI looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'
Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 12:40:05Quote from: The Spoon on 28/01/2023 12:00:22Glaser paper is below.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172cI looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'The author forgot to include the 'control' experiment in his paper, weighing the metals in vacuum, to conclude air convection is responsible for changes in weight.You seem to have forgotten that you already lost this argumentThe evidence is collected every day.https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.msg537466#msg537466
I would bet the flat lines at the end of thermogravimetric graphs are superficially flattened.
Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 13:13:54I would bet the flat lines at the end of thermogravimetric graphs are superficially flattened.So since you have changed the topic I assume you have given up on your biblical flood idea?
Nope, we are still flooded in sh1t and I am waiting for an opening to walk into the third temple in Jerusalem.
Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 13:53:55Nope, we are still flooded in sh1t and I am waiting for an opening to walk into the third temple in Jerusalem.The biblical flood was not water; it was a flood of feces? What does a temple in Jerusalem have to do with anything? Are you talking about science or religion?
I am talking of a place where science and religions meet above the lowlier world of matter.
Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 15:00:02I am talking of a place where science and religions meet above the lowlier world of matter.Where is this place you are referring to?
The Third Temple in Jerusalem.
I expect a linear relationship between heat absorbed and weight loss. Doubling the calories absorbed should double the weight loss.
Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 16:51:01The Third Temple in Jerusalem.So are you saying that scientific experiments will agree with religion in the third temple in Jerusalem? If so then we should run those experiments. Where is the third temple in Jerusalem?
Quote from: Origin on 28/01/2023 17:06:21Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 16:51:01The Third Temple in Jerusalem.So are you saying that scientific experiments will agree with religion in the third temple in Jerusalem? If so then we should run those experiments. Where is the third temple in Jerusalem?No. The third temple has not been built yet. Don't let this side chat of us distract ourselves from concluding the experiment.
I am talking of a place where science and religions meet
Quote from: Bored chemist on 28/01/2023 12:44:00Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 12:40:05Quote from: The Spoon on 28/01/2023 12:00:22Glaser paper is below.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Response-of-apparent-mass-to-thermal-gradients-Gl%C3%A4ser/dd77e00123f2e0efe31f02f9b0b717a98620172cI looked at your reference. The author states: 'it is predominantly free convection forces which change the apparent mass.'The author forgot to include the 'control' experiment in his paper, weighing the metals in vacuum, to conclude air convection is responsible for changes in weight.You seem to have forgotten that you already lost this argumentThe evidence is collected every day.https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=71794.msg537466#msg537466I would bet the flat lines at the end of thermogravimetric graphs are superficially flattened.
Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 08:29:40I expect a linear relationship between heat absorbed and weight loss. Doubling the calories absorbed should double the weight loss.If that's the case, then that would mean that the metal would lose all of its weight if it absorbed 200,000 times as many calories as in the experiment you mentioned (because a weight loss of 100 micrograms multiplied by 200,000 equals 20 grams, the weight of the metal sample). Right?
The third temple has not been built yet.
A vaporized metal is still a gas. If we have that gas in a container, will it lose all of its weight?
Quote from: Yaniv on 28/01/2023 17:41:57The third temple has not been built yet.You can see the future?
Quote from: Kryptid on 28/01/2023 20:34:51A vaporized metal is still a gas. If we have that gas in a container, will it lose all of its weight?No, because gas atoms can hold a finite number of heat particles and heat particles repel each other and will escape the container.