0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The expected result in reply #76 wouldn't make sense according to conservation of energy, if the transmitter actually sends a single photon at a time, which then triggers the detectors. But it makes sense if the transmitter transmit the dim light continuously, and trigger the detectors after they accumulate adequate amount of energy. That's why temperature of the detectors affects the detection rate.
My hypothesis asserts that the randomization occurs at the detector.
So does everyone else's.
Quote from: hamdani yusuf on 15/09/2021 08:28:00Re: Is there a better way to explain light?« Reply #59 on: Today at 17:28:00 »What will happen if we fire a single photon at a 50% reflective mirror sorry for my poor knocked up diagram. Will the single photon become two? [ Invalid Attachment ]
Re: Is there a better way to explain light?« Reply #59 on: Today at 17:28:00 »
The super bizarre quantum eraser experiment
space-time referenc
t perpetuate in our reference.
light exists in two separate references
inertial reference; two legs
universal inertial references
single speed of light reference.
speed of light reference
light reference with our inertial universe.
speed of light reference; 2nd law and universal red shift.
The speed of light reference is where space-time breaks down into separated space and time
Or one can move in time without the constraint of space.
Quote from: puppypower on 14/12/2021 12:13:03Or one can move in time without the constraint of space. What does it mean? Can something stay at its position for a long time? From which drame of reference?
In the past years you may have seen headlines claiming that objective reality does not exist because some quantum mechanics experiment has shown it. In this video I explain what this is all about and why this experiment doesn't show that reality doesn't exist.0:00 Intro0:51 Wigner's friend5:03 The Extended Wigner's Friend Scenario8:18 The experiment that shows reality doesn't exist9:12 What does it mean?10:04 Sponsor message
In this part, we will explore how the corpuscular theory of light and the wave theory of light would each have their own champions and compete for ultimate success. We will discuss the contributions made by the likes of Bernoulli, Young and Fresnel
What's the Real Meaning of Quantum Mechanics? - with Jim BaggottJim explores what are the most popular interpretations of quantum mechanics and how we might need to be a little more specific when we talk about ‘reality’.
Has quantum mechanics proved that reality does not exist?
Philosophy is bunk.
https://phys.org/news/2022-10-scientists-nobel-prize-physics-quantum.htmlFrenchman Alain Aspect, American John F. Clauser and Austrian Anton Zeilinger were cited by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences for experiments proving the "totally crazy" field of quantum entanglements to be all too real. They demonstrated that unseen particles, such as photons, can be linked, or "entangled," with each other even when they are separated by large distances.It all goes back to a feature of the universe that even baffled Albert Einstein and connects matter and light in a tangled, chaotic way."It's so weird," Aspect said of entanglement in a telephone call with the Nobel committee. "I am accepting in my mental images something which is totally crazy."
https://phys.org/news/2022-10-quantum-entanglement-spooky-science-physics.htmlThis year's physics Nobel prize was awarded Tuesday to three men for their work on a phenomenon called quantum entanglement, which is so bizarre and unlikely that Albert Einstein was skeptical, famously calling it "spooky".
https://phys.org/news/2022-10-nobel-winners-quantum-spooky-action.htmlPhysicists Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger developed experimental tools that helped prove quantum entanglement—a phenomenon Albert Einstein famously dismissed as "spooky action at a distance"—is real, paving the way for its use in powerful computers.
What makes mainstream scientists accept weird explanation for light?
What can possibly be done to make it less weird?