The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Cuey
  3. Show Posts
  4. Messages
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Messages - Cuey

Pages: [1]
1
New Theories / e=mc2 wrong?
« on: 27/07/2006 11:45:32 »
Im not sure if this is the right place so sorry if it isn't!

I recently read somewhere that Einsteins famous equation e=mc2 is flawed and recently (in the last decade or so) a scientist had revised and modified it. I was wondering what your thought were on this and if anybody else has heard of this? Also does anyone know what the revised equation is? (i can't remember it or find the source!)

E=MC2 is wrong!!!

2
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Wind?
« on: 28/07/2006 10:16:29 »
cheers that helped alot!

E=MC2 is wrong!!!

3
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Wind?
« on: 27/07/2006 13:29:17 »
Thanks that has helped! I sort of understand it now. But does that mean that wind cannit exist in a true vacuum? Because if wind is caused by particals of air flowing from an area of high pressure to an area of low pressure, then in couldn't take place in a vacuum! Is that right or am I way off?
Also what about a fan? How does a fan create wind?

E=MC2 is wrong!!!

4
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Wind?
« on: 28/07/2006 10:16:29 »
cheers that helped alot!

E=MC2 is wrong!!!

5
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Re: Wind?
« on: 27/07/2006 13:29:17 »
Thanks that has helped! I sort of understand it now. But does that mean that wind cannit exist in a true vacuum? Because if wind is caused by particals of air flowing from an area of high pressure to an area of low pressure, then in couldn't take place in a vacuum! Is that right or am I way off?
Also what about a fan? How does a fan create wind?

E=MC2 is wrong!!!

6
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Wind?
« on: 27/07/2006 11:31:15 »
Im not sure that this is the right place but im new here so sorry if it is in the wrong place!

I am doing a little project and i need to know what wind is, where it comes from etc.
I have an idea but i may be way off! The only thing that i can come up with is that wind is caused by kinetic energy passed from molecule to molecule. The more kinetic energy, the stronger the wind. If this is right, it would explain why when you blow on something, it creates wind! (The heat energy from your breath is changed into kinetic) Also if this is correct, does that mean that in a true vacuum wind cannot exist? But then theres solar wind?
I'm confused! Any help would be greatly Appreciated as it would help me to better understand mt project.

E=MC2 is wrong!!!

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.079 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.