The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Profile of Maniax101
  3. Show Posts
  4. Topics
  • Profile Info
    • Summary
    • Show Stats
    • Show Posts
      • Messages
      • Topics
      • Attachments
      • Thanked Posts
      • Posts Thanked By User
    • Show User Topics
      • User Created
      • User Participated In

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

  • Messages
  • Topics
  • Attachments
  • Thanked Posts
  • Posts Thanked By User

Topics - Maniax101

Pages: [1]
1
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Can we "see" a proton?
« on: 17/01/2011 10:56:45 »
Hey.
A double question...

From what I understand, we "see" something because light, or a photon, hits an electron in an object, thus exciting it to a higher orbit, and when the electron "falls down" it gives away a photon that we then interpret.
What if we shoot photons at a single proton, or neutron? Will they bounce off of it, or what happens then?

Secondly, what if you shoot a single photon at, for example, an uranium atom that has lots of electrons and lots of shells. What if the photon (being so fast) does not excite the electron in the outmost shell, but hits one "further in". Would that turn the photon into some sort of pinball frenzy in there, or is it always the outmost electron that is affected. If so, why?

2
General Science / What would be the radius of a sphere made of many smaller identical spheres?
« on: 22/06/2010 08:51:48 »
Hey,

If i have a sphere of r=1, and take 1000 of those and arrange them into a larger sphere (for example if i let those go in an empty region of space and let gravity do the work) - what will the radius be of the larger sphere?

//Thanks

[MOD EDIT - PLEASE ENSURE THAT POST TITLES ARE FORMATTED AS QUESTIONS IN FUTURE. THANKS. CHRIS]

3
Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology / Would a huge star be invisible?
« on: 22/10/2009 15:08:24 »
When an object increases in mass, the grav. field grows. How big would a star have to be for its escape velocity to exeed the speed of light? If these huge stars (I presume) exists, then we wouldn't be able to see them... no?

[MOD EDIT - PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU PHRASE YOUR THREAD TITLES AS QUESTIONS, IN LINE WITH FORUM POLICY; THANKS, CHRIS]

4
Science Experiments / Acceleration and water
« on: 21/09/2009 15:09:38 »
I read somewhere in a science-fiction book that in order to withstand huge acceleration (in an interstellar craft) you would probably have to be floating in a liquid of sorts, as the liquid is hard to compress, you would feel less stress as the craft accelerated.
The question is then : If you here on earth are swimming in a huge fishtank that is suspended from a crane, and then the tank is dropped from a distance down into any body of water, would you feel the drop? or the impact?
I would want to say yes, but i'm not sure.
What do you think?

Pages: [1]
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.