Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Hadrian on 19/04/2006 15:28:29

Title: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 19/04/2006 15:28:29
A new theory of nothing
There was once nothing and then there was something. Then after along time something became nothing again and so it all came to nothing in the end. Which turned out to be something after all, even though it had little to do with anything anyway. Which is just as well as you can get anything out of nothing with out something be there in there first place and that would mean the nothing was something and the would then result in there was once nothing and then there was something and so on.

If I don’t get a Nobel Prize for this I will know it’s fixed size=1]

What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Andrew K Fletcher on 19/04/2006 19:06:47
Maybe you will get nothing :)

"The explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is most likely to be correct."
K.I.S. "Keep it simple!"
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 21/04/2006 08:22:02
Ah the zero effect   [:D][:D][:D]

What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Dante on 16/05/2006 07:49:15
Be honest now, that's just meant to confuse people.
it's philisophical anyway.
everything=something and nothing=something, so everything=nothing.
so don't worry about it, you don't actualy exist.
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: DoctorBeaver on 22/05/2006 11:37:41
Or, as Terry Pratchett put it...

Once upon a time there was nothing, which exploded. It then got very big.

Brand new forum at
http://beaverlandforum.y4a.net
More than just science
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: neilep on 22/05/2006 13:58:21
If nothing is something then nothing does not exist !

Men are the same as women, just inside out !
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: science_guy on 25/05/2006 19:31:32
no, something used to be nothing, and may become nothing again, but nothing is never somthing.  After all, the only oxymoron ive ever seen that works is Jumbo Shrimp.

Maybe we should go for the little bang theory. :)

E=MC2... m=deg/360 X C... C= PiD

therefore E=deg/360 X 2(PiD)
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: FHLew on 17/06/2006 07:30:26
Hadrian wrote:
( Posted - 19 Apr 2006 : 15:28:29)

   < There was once nothing and then there was something. Then after along time something became nothing again and so it all came to nothing in the end.....>

The Living Void [ Physical Vacuum ]

Form is emptiness, and emptiness is indeed form. Emptiness is not different from Form,Form is not different from Emptiness. What is Form that is Emptiness, what is Emptiness that is Form ? The Physical Vacuum, as it is called in Field Theory, is not a state of mere nothingness but contains the potentiality for all forms of the particle world. These forms,in turn, are not independent physical entities but merely transcient manifestations of the underlying Void. The Great Void cannot but consist of Chi, Prana or Vital Force; this Zero Point Energy, Chi or etheric nothingness cannot but condense to form all things; and these things cannot but become dispersed so as to form , once more ,the Great Void. At the time of its condensation, can one say otherwise than that this is but temporary? But at the time of its dispersing, can one hastily say that it is then non-existent ? Thus Chi condenses and disperses rhythmically, bringing forth all forms which eventually dissolve into the Void. Solid objects with Form dissipate quanta as Colour. Thus, No Form, No Colour.

Most of the time, every thing is not black, white, grey, red or yellow but is mostly invisible - The 2004 Nobel Prize Winning " Colour Force " of Quarks and Gluons,

Only the Sound of Light in the vibrant DNA, the Living Wave in the Universal Mind.

With regards
   Lew
 


Doctors merely assist. Only Mother Nature does the healing.
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Andrew K Fletcher on 18/06/2006 10:56:43
.
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 18/06/2006 13:27:07
Dear Lew.

May you bask in the hands of endless bliss that lies within and yet beyond all form.

Hadrian

What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: heikki on 15/07/2006 14:51:47
quote:
Originally posted by Hadrian

A new theory of nothing
There was once nothing and then there was something. Then after along time something became nothing again and so it all came to nothing in the end. Which turned out to be something after all, even though it had little to do with anything anyway. Which is just as well as you can get anything out of nothing with out something be there in there first place and that would mean the nothing was something and the would then result in there was once nothing and then there was something and so on.





[:)]

Hi.

I have think that also and i found answer.

Nothing dont exist.

Then this all dont has start point.

And evolution is timeless continuous space-nature process without start or end.

And we are part of that.

We cannot know everything and it is not necessary.

So, life is life.

[:)]
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 16/07/2006 14:35:40
I stand on the edge of nothingness with my arms apart
What is before me as is behind me is neither I nor not I
Do not fall a much as give like the air gives to you hand
With a child’s eye you see a universe in a grain of sand
In one moment of essence all time it is neither I nor not I
I sink in love now in to eternal emptiness with a joyful hart


What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Karen W. on 24/07/2006 04:14:18
Hadrian you amaze me!......Karen
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: moonfire on 25/07/2006 13:29:36
Truly amazing Hadrian!!  LOL  I think Andrew put it best as you can see by his experiment or no experiment..there is nothing there at all!  LOL

"Lo" Loretta
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Boo on 16/08/2006 06:29:29
HAHAH wonderful! this whole post is amazing and i think i like it..

becca :)
Title: Re: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 12/12/2006 10:38:44
Glad to say nothing is still happening and that something
Title: A new theory of nothing
Post by: jolly on 23/02/2007 23:57:26
deleted as inapproprate
Title: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 06/03/2007 17:56:46
Nothings changes,


So it wasn’t nothing to begin with or how could it change

 
Title: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Infamous on 06/03/2007 18:06:20
Nothing, nada, zip, zero, goose egg, and naught. A question for those interested; If nothing grows very large, is a big nothing more useful than a small nothing?

My answer: Yes, because it allows more room for something!!

........................Infy
Title: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 06/03/2007 19:28:50
vary true the bigger the nothing the bigger the something that fills it.  [:0]
Title: A new theory of nothing
Post by: Hadrian on 02/10/2007 14:30:28
nonthing much to report about something is still nothing.