0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
What are some examples of Bible hate speech?
Satanism is known for things like ritual child sexual abuse
and praying for people they do not like to die.
I went to school with some. They were into horror movies. My cousin was bitten by one in a raid that left him in tears, and had to be sent to a country school to hide him from them.
Satan means the obstacle to life, and is the author of things like murder, adultery and deception...
Hating evil people is an odd thing, it is what the witch hunters thought or claimed they were doing. The idea of scape goating groups of people, it is trendy to find fault with, is no good. Witches, prophets, Christians, Jews, homosexuals, commies, mentally ill, and the new ones, sex offenders and terrorists. It seemed right at the time to some, to persecute these people, but was wrong in retrospect. Now the offenders in the cross hairs are more thoughtfully determined. But haters and cynics have a low form of wisdom and are not admirable.
I have noticed that there are more than one type of atheist,
other religions who have sought to demonise it - their parody of Satanism
Quote from: David Cooper on 26/05/2017 20:34:37other religions who have sought to demonise it - their parody of SatanismNo pun intended?
Indeed. When an angel is rebranded as a demon in order to class it as evil, that is demonisation. Take Lucifer, for example. He was an angel who supposedly fell and became a demon, if you believe the Abrahamists who needed to blacken his name in order to promote a new fairy. Lucifer is actually the morning star, aka the planet Venus, and that never fell - it's still up there shining as a beacon. It would be just as easy for a new religion to take Jesus and to demonise him while casting Christians as people who drink blood and eat human flesh, at which point Jesus becomes demonic and his followers branded as Satanic. That is how religions fight for supremacy, by doing each other down. Islam demonised the Yazidis and cast them as devil worshippers, leading to the recent genocide by ISIS, and a string of other genocides against them in the past. In every case it's the same thing, and it doesn't matter greatly which religion is involved - the semi-autistic thugs in the population whip up everyone else to act on the hate speech in their holy texts and they go on a killing spree while the more moderate people of that religion can't control them. They are then seen as evil by outsiders and the whole religion gets branded as evil as a consequence, which in a way, it is - all religions with hate speech in their holy texts are capable of generating this kind of slaughter, and when good people endorse a religion and turn a blind eye to the hate in its holy texts, they unwittingly give that hate their endorsement too, making it more likely that others will act on it. The primary hate behind terrorism is the holy hate in the holy texts, and people need to take the plank out of their own eye before they try to remove a splinter from someone else's - people of Abrahamic religions need to detoxify their own religions (by removing all God's hate speech from their holy texts and burning it) before they condemn Satanists for encouraging people to hate those who do evil.
...the semi-autistic thugs in the population whip up everyone else to act on the hate speech ...
Quote from: David Cooper on 26/05/2017 20:34:37Indeed. When an angel is rebranded as a demon in order to class it as evil, that is demonisation. Take Lucifer, for example. He was an angel who supposedly fell and became a demon, if you believe the Abrahamists who needed to blacken his name in order to promote a new fairy. Lucifer is actually the morning star, aka the planet Venus, and that never fell - it's still up there shining as a beacon. It would be just as easy for a new religion to take Jesus and to demonise him while casting Christians as people who drink blood and eat human flesh, at which point Jesus becomes demonic and his followers branded as Satanic. That is how religions fight for supremacy, by doing each other down. Islam demonised the Yazidis and cast them as devil worshippers, leading to the recent genocide by ISIS, and a string of other genocides against them in the past. In every case it's the same thing, and it doesn't matter greatly which religion is involved - the semi-autistic thugs in the population whip up everyone else to act on the hate speech in their holy texts and they go on a killing spree while the more moderate people of that religion can't control them. They are then seen as evil by outsiders and the whole religion gets branded as evil as a consequence, which in a way, it is - all religions with hate speech in their holy texts are capable of generating this kind of slaughter, and when good people endorse a religion and turn a blind eye to the hate in its holy texts, they unwittingly give that hate their endorsement too, making it more likely that others will act on it. The primary hate behind terrorism is the holy hate in the holy texts, and people need to take the plank out of their own eye before they try to remove a splinter from someone else's - people of Abrahamic religions need to detoxify their own religions (by removing all God's hate speech from their holy texts and burning it) before they condemn Satanists for encouraging people to hate those who do evil.Lucifer is defined by the scriptures that source the name... and morning star and sunrise make an allegory. Worship leader, then the one worshiped comes.Lucifer invented deception, blasphemy, slander, fornication, adultery, murder, death... also disease, plague, famine, war, the curses. These are the things in scriptures and with regards to Pandora's box.Lucifer fell before scriptures were written, before the dawn of man and was never portrayed as good. He is behind the "I will" statements. The first independent. Tremendous in pride.
Quote from: David Cooper on 27/05/2017 18:17:23...the semi-autistic thugs in the population whip up everyone else to act on the hate speech ...Nope, you are not getting away with that.Autistic people are among the least likely to be religious thugs.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/05/2017 18:55:34Quote from: David Cooper on 27/05/2017 18:17:23...the semi-autistic thugs in the population whip up everyone else to act on the hate speech ...Nope, you are not getting away with that.Autistic people are among the least likely to be religious thugs.The people looking into the minds of terrorists say otherwise - they generally have autistic tendencies. ... Do you seriously think the terrorists out there who behead people are normal on average? No - there is something far from normal about them.
Which is an earlier version of "the truth" about Lucifer? David Cooper?If you look up India's first god, Purusha, in wikipedia 2011 version, it says he lost one third of his angels.
However the people looking at autism and religion say that they are negatively correlated.http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2011/papers/0782/paper0782.pdfso, presumably, these "semi-autistic religious thugs" are atheist "semi-autistic religious thugs".
On a web site like this, autistic is probably "Normal ".
Do you think the terrorists are the typical members of this forum, or do you think we'd probably be the last people to fall into the trap of thinking that violence and suicide are the answer.
So, your logic goes something like "terrorists are not normal, autistic people are not normal therefore terrorists are autistic people".
OK, how about "Frisian cows are black and white Dalmatian dogs are black and white therefore dogs are cows."It's the same argument, equally valid, and obvious nonsense.
Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankindRead more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins107012.html