0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
[/color]Alex Dullius Siqueira : The speed of light may be constant from A to B, although once the speed itself is dependent of the field it for witch it travels, the speed will remain constant in both experiments, although the measurements are sure to be different.
Nilak: Even if this experiment example could be wrong, my concept predicts the speed of light anisotropy. There are other results, including deductions using current knowledge.
Quote[/color]Alex Dullius Siqueira : The speed of light may be constant from A to B, although once the speed itself is dependent of the field it for witch it travels, the speed will remain constant in both experiments, although the measurements are sure to be different. QuoteNilak: Even if this experiment example could be wrong, my concept predicts the speed of light anisotropy. There are other results, including deductions using current knowledge. Would I be right in making the following deduction from your statements? The average distance from the earth to the moon is 384,403 km. the speed of light is 299,784 km/s , therefore it should take a radio transmission exactly 1.28223099 seconds to cover this distance and this is the time that a radio transmission does take. According to special relativity, this is illusion; in reality it takes the radio transmission 2.56446 etc., seconds for the radio transmission to reach the moon, but because of time dilation it registers on the clock as 1.28223 etc., seconds for the radio transmission to reach the moon. Isn't this highly convoluted, after all in terms of today's time measurements where it is possible to measure time intervals of 10-15 s. a difference of 1.2822 seconds is huge? On the other hand if a medium such as a universal field or an aether, hitherto undetected, does exist then it would serve as a Universal frame of reference and also account for the speed of light being constant. In your post you have postulated a different medium for each frame of reference so that, these are separate entities in each of which light travels at a constant speed.
Nilak:I don't understand something. 2.56 = 2*1.28 hence the 2.56. Where does this factor come from and why is it exactly 2.? Also, what is the meaning of "in reality"? I didn't postulate a different medium for which frame.
Alex Dullius Siqueira : I agree with the idea of a medium for C. But I only sugested that if you place another moon, with the exact shape, rotation, atoms, at the ecxact opposit side of our planet and take meassurements. The speed of "the frame of light" is sure to remain proportional/constant in function of the medium C. That this does not guarrantee that the two measurements, of the two laser beams for each individual moon will be equal. The medium is and never will be static. It's the way it is accounting for each particle existing because of it, many factors may have change the one way and the two way distance in between the two experiments.