why not just make your point?He did.
On an unrelated point, Practically every post that Dave Lev has made is trolling.
Why is he still here?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
otherwise we could just run some bioreactors instead of using the H-B process.For a very long time, we did.
My question was in the hope of finding a steer to find more information.And we answered it.
Please remember - We only focus on the SMBH accretion disc!Then we know nothing, because we can barely see it.
As you have just reconfirm - we have NEVER EVER observed any sort of things which are falling into the SMBH' accretion disc!No.
Again - Please stop telling us about "thing that is falling in towards the BH" as nothing falls in towards the BH.Light does.
Therefore, they aren't falling in but orbiting around with high eccentricity!!!You do know that a thing in orbit is falling, don't you?
What argument can be made, against this obvious truth?The fact that human (and other animal) bodies are actually "designed" to make use of a large range of food and drink.
The doom and gloom predictions of the computer models do not pan out each year, over the past 20 years,Except that the data shows that we are getting a greater number of "extreme" weather events.
So y'all are suggesting that someone drew in the dimensions that I'm looking for in a frame by frame animation?No.
"we created a virtual camera that was fast enough"
"we could capture light as it spreads through the virtual scene"
" 2D light transport simulator "
"Monte Carlo raytracing"
"we assign our virtual camera"
"To keep track of time along light paths, I will be using a slightly modified geometric optics model"
"on top of our existing 2D renderer with only a few lines of code."
"we use a conventional 2D renderer"
"We annotate each vertex on these light paths with a timestamp"
"store these in memory"
"we iterate over all segments"
"splat the line segment to the screen"
"we could do it in a vertex shader"
The man who made the original video is a specialist in computer simulations.
If you really think that you are right, it's very simple.
He has contact details.
Ask him if it's real.
I don't think the OP understands why this is a problem.An astronaut has a mass of 55kg on Earth. Would the astronauts weight be different on the ISS?
In one sentence you use mass and in the other you use weight. Make your mind up. Which is it?
The Haber-Bosch process cracks methane to produce hydrogen (with CO2 as a waste product) which is then reacted with nitrogen to make ammonia.Strictly, the H-B process is only the second step- the reaction of H2 and N2.
Most cars don't get used most of the time, so that's OK.And they may use less electricity during peak hour, if they use the car battery to supplement the household electricity consumption.You have hit upon the real purpose of an electric car: it makes the planet "greener" as long as you don't use it!
Oddly, if you deconstruct the word it sort of means the same, though why nobody under the age of 50 can say "regarding" baffles me.You seem to have misspelled "about".
irregardless.That's not a real word.
Repeating the experimentIt's not an experiment.
I'm keeping this post live for discussion.Then discuss.
The one truth that can be said is that it bears repeating in order ffor the experiment's
It's not an experiment, it's a cartoon.
Entropy has a connection to the colligative properties.It has a connection to the game of scrabble.
The colligative properties do not depend on the character of the solute.And entropy is not one ot them.
Solute character is primarily defined by the EM force.Unless we are talking about non polar materials...
Colligative properties are not related to the EM force, but have more of a connection to mass and gravity.Tosh.
Higher pressure has more mass based inertia per particle.No
Pressure is a common artifact of gravity. The atmospheric pressure, the pressures under the oceans and the pressure at the core of the earth are all dependent on the earth's gravity.Yep
Boiling point elevation and freezing point depression are also pressure dependent
Entropy is a state variable
Water vapor has more entropy than liquid water. The equilibrium between these two states is connected to pressure.
Temperature is connected to heat,
If you look at the electron, the electron remains one particle, even at the most extreme particle collider conditions. The electron has both mass and negative charge.
Temperature and heat impacts everything in any given state of matter.
I suppose we can heat one particle in a gas with a laser.
At steady state the entire gas volume will share the heat.
These two links show that seismic waves can only move under the earth's crust.The fact that buildings fall down during earthquakes shows that seismic waves can travel through the Earth's crust.
Do you understand the idea of a rhetorical question?To be shed they must exit the body and hitch a ride om a droplet or aerosol.And how do they arrange to do this (or to not do it)?
Sorry to be so long replying - suffereing the slings and arrows of outragious immoderators.
How they might arrange to do this, is what I am hoping to figure out. The reason for the question was to find out if there were any viruses which are known to do this and investigate from there.
Clearly this is something I cannot do insofar as I am presumably a part of this universe (and I think it is also said that the universe has no external boundary).We will never know; so the question isn't science.
However is it not possible that the beginning(if there was a beginning) of the universe was witnessed by an intelligent being (or even just another object?) and so this being or thing would have had something of an objective view of what happened?
Is that feasible ?
Would that mean that the universe did in fact have a boundary, even if that boundary was dynamic and poorly defined ?