Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => That CAN'T be true! => Topic started by: aglitteremains on 17/06/2022 00:28:09
-
Okay, so TL;DR, I need to know if my math theory is wrong... I won't go into a lot of garbage on it... but I'll put it in short below... it's so extensive, I couldn't fit it into the title.
This involves the last Caesar of Rome being so egotistical, he changed the calendar used to have every month (and day of the week) some version of his name, as I recall... he extended the calendar from 10 months to twelve.... but, you see, months often had to be calculated in lengths, as did weeks, before this occurred... to match the seasons and moon together (as all time was calculated by the moon, and not the sun's position - it used a different calculation based on shadows on a sundial). Later, the Gregorian's slipped in the Leap Day/Year to "fix" his "mistake" (Ha!), but truth is... the calendar used to go essentially by the phases and position of the moon. But this became an issue when we invented the train industry, so further edits were made... to clocks (in train stations), if I understand correctly.
I began playing around with this, and discovered... well, essentially I think time may be a variable and not a constant, but that's something entirely different than the following query (a word problem I'm attempting to calculate):
Lunar Math (not Solar based math calculation) + Marko Rodin's Vortex math (corrected) + string theory (corrected to Tesla's theories - 9 and not 10) + Hyperfractastratified computational data synthesis = ?
Is the above even possible and/or correct, or am I just off track entirely and see something that isn't there?
I was chasing the "flaw" with Einstein's E=MC2 formula Mark Rodin found when he went a bit farther with Tesla's math... Vortex Math. I had realized that perhaps the flaw was that we were calculating everything due to an egotistical maniac (Caesar Augustus - remember the entire senate slaughtered themselves, and his own best friend killed him himself the day Rome fell *in* a day).
Mind you I'm quite nutty... but I'm not stupid... so, if I'm really stupid *and* crazy, I'd like to know please lol.
I know CERN was kind of messing around (rumored) with something similar involving particle physics - not my forte... what would happen if I added that too? I'm boggled by what I see in the calculations... but am I wrong?
-
Is the above even possible and/or correct, or am I just off track entirely and see something that isn't there?
Looks like you're off track entirely. string theory (corrected to Tesla's theories - 9 and not 10)
Yep, way off track, since that makes no sense.
-
Hi.
This involves the last Caesar of Rome being so egotistical, he changed the calendar used...
I'm not an expert on the ancient calendar system. I thought several emperors were involved in changing the calendar not just one.
..(about)...a word problem I'm attempting to calculate
Word problems mean something different to different people. I'm not able to understand what is being done here, sorry.
...so, if I'm really stupid *and* crazy, I'd like to know please lol...
This isn't my website but this is what I think applies and would be the general policy here: This forum cannot and should not offer medical advice or attempt to make any diagnosis. OK that's the serious bit over.
Speaking more informally, we get a lot of first-time posters that aren't all that serious and may be trying to do something else, like advertise their own website. Please be tolerant if your post doesn't get full attention or seems to be dismissed too quickly.
- - - - - - -
Overall, I don't entirely understand what you wanted to discuss and I'm not able to make much of useful contribution here. All I can do is welcome you to the site.
Best Wishes to you.
-
Essentially my query wonders if we've been doing math (arabic numerals), binary, unicode, etc... to solar based math equations since around the time of ceasar... yes, several folks were involved... as it was harder to calculate the old ways... it was time consuming, and people had to be paid to do it (as of course we didn't have computers to do it for us). I just went back to the mesopotatmian eras and found the essential first ways we calculated math at all. Einstein's theory was debatedly lied about, as he had to do so (radical theory) to get out of a nazi asylum and to america (national geographic and history channel have both made a documentary on his escape). He was swiss also, and we know now that we calculate time itself via that swiss crystal and not the sun, as it is far more exact. But I found an element that can tell time, if you calculate math via lunar math (the only word I have for it, as it doesn't exist today)... it doesn't work if you use solar based math. But when I tried Einstein's math with that... I got what I think it the real answer... it only works if you use Vortex math a ways down tho. It indicates that he knew there *was* a speed faster than light. But, I know we had always wondered about some of his equations.
The indication is that... well, to me it doesn't make sense either, which is why I asked... because I began wondering about some of Tesla's equations... this involves string theory... when I tried string theory to Tesla's 9, and not ten, and used lunar math... well... I'm afraid to say without a consensus but time may really be relative to the location you stand. Like... it's almost as if space goes by a time of it's own... and... if I didn't know better... there may be different "types" of time.. um, crazy theory of course... but, essentially.. particles (like that swiss crystals' particles can measure time, so can the sun, so can the moon... but they are all different, when I measure them. Shouldn't they be the same?
I have peer reviewed source links... I saw in rules we shouldn't post links... but one is a entry on 'hyperfractastratified computational data synthesis' on the library of medicine at the national institute of health, and the other is the Canadian Mathematical Societies' information on 'Crux Mathematicorum' and it all involves what I call "true zero"... I've found vague references to a zero with a plus sign thru it... but we do have different zeros... absolute zero, etc... iirc, right now our absolute zero is set against Pi... I think... but... lunar math changes that a bit... of course, this also involves cos and sin, which is how I wandered into string theory at all...
Yes, of course, we should always follow process of elimination, and the Socratic method... I've been doing it for some time and hit a wall of sorts... felt I needed to ask... of course, not for medical advise lol - it was a metaphorical/facetious query... needless to say, if someone wants to try the calculations of math done way back... to the moon, as before they changed the calendar to measurements of the sun (and then to cyrstal)... I'd just feel a bit better is all... I've been trying to disprove this for quite some time now, actually... but all signs seem to point to me being correct.
-
... but all signs seem to point to me being correct.
Actually, non of the signs point to you being correct.
Calendar systems evolved around annual seasons and vary around the world, it’s easy to convert between them and they have no effect on Einstein’s theories.
Here we talk about pseudoscience, which is often the stringing together of scientific sounding words that has no scientific content or meaning. Vortex maths is often referred to as pseudomaths for similar reasons and will be of no use in determining anything scientific.
Overall, you have not given sufficient detail on your calculations for us to make a final judgement, but the above points are a good indicator.
Are you mad? Well, there are many forms of madness. We often get posters who feel they have overturned Einstein’s theory, or quantum mechanics, or who think the earth is flat, or that man has never landed on the moon. I would suggest they are delusional.
-
I regret to inform you that marko rodin's "vortex maths" is nonsense.
-
Sorry, but why? I see some ration in all those algebra and geometry theories. Socrates and Einstein knew something; I bet) However, suppose you have such issues and doubts with calculus and analysis, and you do not get solutions to your unclearness. In that case, I suggest you access the source from https://plainmath.net/secondary/calculus-and-analysis/calculus-1/analyzing-functions (https://plainmath.net/secondary/calculus-and-analysis/calculus-1/analyzing-functions) because I use it to receive reliable analyzing functions, questions and answers, no matter how complicated. Try it, and you will not be disappointed by the service's professionals.
-
Hi & Welcome to the Forum!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanke%E2%80%93Henry_Permanent_Calendar
Thanks & Credits - Wikipedia.