0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Is it quite a big cookie jar?
I think I know what B.C.'s getting at here. She squeezed the last child into the jar with the cookie. Not easy, I know, but probably possible if you cut his little arms and legs off first and maybe use a hammer.
There are 50 horses and 50 kings riding along an old dirt road. They came to a peach tree with 50 peaches. Each took one, yet there were still 49 left. How is this possible? []
Quote from: Bored chemist on 22/04/2010 19:15:24Is it quite a big cookie jar?I think I know what B.C.'s getting at here. She squeezed the last child into the jar with the cookie. Not easy, I know, but probably possible if you cut his little arms and legs off first and maybe use a hammer.What? Don't blame me. It was B.C.'s idea!
It's possible if we consider that each Peach (each atom) has an anti-peach. So, assuming that you have 50 'real kings', and one anti-king you didn't count because it does not belong to the category of 'real kings', you have 50 'real peaches' gone, and one anti-peach gone. Hence 49 (anti-)peaches left. Oh, by the way, the Peach and the anti-peaches never came into contact. Then you would have zero Peaches, zero trees, and zero kings.Lets stick to L-Kira's version []
Quote from: DrChemistry on 28/04/2010 20:30:18It's possible if we consider that each Peach (each atom) has an anti-peach. So, assuming that you have 50 'real kings', and one anti-king you didn't count because it does not belong to the category of 'real kings', you have 50 'real peaches' gone, and one anti-peach gone. Hence 49 (anti-)peaches left. Oh, by the way, the Peach and the anti-peaches never came into contact. Then you would have zero Peaches, zero trees, and zero kings.Lets stick to L-Kira's version []Even if anit-Peaches exist you need anti-kings to prevent explosion and save other 49 kings.
Quote from: L-Kira on 29/04/2010 03:54:30Quote from: DrChemistry on 28/04/2010 20:30:18It's possible if we consider that each Peach (each atom) has an anti-peach. So, assuming that you have 50 'real kings', and one anti-king you didn't count because it does not belong to the category of 'real kings', you have 50 'real peaches' gone, and one anti-peach gone. Hence 49 (anti-)peaches left. Oh, by the way, the Peach and the anti-peaches never came into contact. Then you would have zero Peaches, zero trees, and zero kings.Lets stick to L-Kira's version []Even if anit-Peaches exist you need anti-kings to prevent explosion and save other 49 kings.I don't wish to seem racist, but what about dark kings? Are they the same as anti-kings?
It's possible if we consider that each Peach (each atom) has an anti-peach. So, assuming that you have 50 'real kings', and one anti-king you didn't count because it does not belong to the category of 'real kings', you have 50 'real peaches' gone, and one anti-peach gone. Hence 49 (anti-)peaches left. Oh, by the way, the Peach and the anti-peaches never came into contact. Then you would have zero Peaches, zero trees, and zero kings.
Quote from: DrChemistry on 28/04/2010 20:30:18It's possible if we consider that each Peach (each atom) has an anti-peach. So, assuming that you have 50 'real kings', and one anti-king you didn't count because it does not belong to the category of 'real kings', you have 50 'real peaches' gone, and one anti-peach gone. Hence 49 (anti-)peaches left. Oh, by the way, the Peach and the anti-peaches never came into contact. Then you would have zero Peaches, zero trees, and zero kings.Thank you DrChemistry []omid loved your answer, [^] what are the five little objects of everyday sort that you can find in tennis court? []
this is not fair Omid. I answered it first.what's wrong with you?L-Kira.
what are the five little objects of everyday sort that you can find in tennis court? []
Quote from: L-Kira on 29/04/2010 17:39:11this is not fair Omid. I answered it first.what's wrong with you?L-Kira.but his answer was the one omid was looking for []ok, try n answer the next one please [)]
Do you know something about antimatter ?or Anti stuff ?what do you mean you want his answer ?WANT ??
Quote from: L-Kira on 29/04/2010 17:46:48Do you know something about antimatter ?or Anti stuff ?what do you mean you want his answer ?WANT ??omid didn't used the word "WANT"
what's the meaning of anti-peaches ?if you really understand that. I consider that I was incorrect.first you answer this and I will answer the next one.
Quote from: L-Kira on 29/04/2010 17:51:46what's the meaning of anti-peaches ?if you really understand that. I consider that I was incorrect.first you answer this and I will answer the next one.Chill L-kira!!!!!! omid meant that his answer sounded funny so omid liked his one the most, omid knows that your answer is right and Thank you for posting the right answer []